10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on February 11, 2008
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended: December
31, 2007
Commission
File Number: 0-22175
EMCORE
Corporation
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
New
Jersey
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
22-2746503
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
10420 Research Road
SE,
Albuquerque, NM 87123
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(505)
332-5000
(Registrant's
telephone number)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
¨ Large
accelerated filer
|
x Accelerated
filer
|
¨ Non-accelerated
filer
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The
number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s no par value common stock as of
February 4, 2008 was 57,028,010.
1
EMCORE Corporation
FORM
10-Q
For
the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2007
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PAGE
|
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
3
|
|
20
|
|
32
|
|
33
|
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
34
|
|
36
|
|
36
|
|
36
|
|
36
|
|
36
|
|
37
|
|
38
|
PART I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EMCORE
CORPORATION
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For
the three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
(in
thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
December
31,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Product
revenue
|
$ | 44,501 | $ | 35,626 | ||||
Service
revenue
|
2,386 | 2,970 | ||||||
Total
revenue
|
46,887 | 38,596 | ||||||
Cost
of product revenue
|
35,482 | 30,941 | ||||||
Cost
of service revenue
|
1,532 | 2,159 | ||||||
Total
cost of revenue
|
37,014 | 33,100 | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
9,873 | 5,496 | ||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
16,237 | 12,539 | ||||||
Research
and development
|
7,190 | 6,611 | ||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
23,427 | 19,150 | ||||||
Operating
loss
|
(13,554 | ) | (13,654 | ) | ||||
Other
expenses (income):
|
||||||||
Interest
income
|
(427 | ) | (1,651 | ) | ||||
Interest
expense
|
1,205 | 1,262 | ||||||
Loss
on disposal of equipment
|
86 | - | ||||||
Foreign
exchange gain
|
(13 | ) | - | |||||
Total
other expenses (income)
|
851 | (389 | ) | |||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (14,405 | ) | $ | (13,265 | ) | ||
Per
share data
|
||||||||
Net
loss per basic and diluted share
|
$ | (0.28 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | ||
Weighted-average
number of basic and diluted shares outstanding
|
52,232 | 50,875 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements.
EMCORE
CORPORATION
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As
of December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007
(in
thousands)
(unaudited)
As
of
December
31,
2007
|
As
of
September
30,
2007
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
14,610
|
$
|
12,151
|
||||
Restricted
cash
|
1,307
|
1,538
|
||||||
Marketable
securities
|
15,150
|
29,075
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance of $798 and $802,
respectively
|
41,282
|
38,151
|
||||||
Receivables,
related party
|
332
|
332
|
||||||
Inventory,
net
|
29,625
|
29,205
|
||||||
Income
tax receivable
|
130
|
-
|
||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
4,100
|
4,350
|
||||||
Total
current assets
|
106,536
|
114,802
|
||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
60,294
|
57,257
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
41,681
|
40,990
|
||||||
Other
intangible assets, net
|
4,899
|
5,275
|
||||||
Investments
in unconsolidated affiliates
|
14,872
|
14,872
|
||||||
Other
non-current assets, net
|
2,001
|
1,540
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
230,283
|
$
|
234,736
|
||||
LIABILITIES
and SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
24,309
|
$
|
22,685
|
||||
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
27,413
|
28,776
|
||||||
Income
tax payable
|
593
|
137
|
||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
52,315
|
51,598
|
||||||
Convertible
subordinated notes
|
85,012
|
84,981
|
||||||
Total
liabilities
|
137,327
|
136,579
|
||||||
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 11)
|
||||||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.0001 par, 5,882 shares authorized, no shares
outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Common
stock, no par value, 100,000 shares authorized, 52,351 shares issued and
52,192 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2007; 51,208 shares issued
and 51,049 shares outstanding as of September 30, 2007
|
453,358
|
443,835
|
||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(358,309
|
)
|
(343,578
|
)
|
||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(10
|
)
|
(17
|
)
|
||||
Treasury
stock, at cost; 159 shares
|
(2,083
|
)
|
(2,083
|
)
|
||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
92,956
|
98,157
|
||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$
|
230,283
|
$
|
234,736
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements.
EMCORE
CORPORATION
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For
the three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
(in
thousands)
(unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
December
31,
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (14,405 | ) | $ | (13,265 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
5,448 | 2,326 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization expense
|
2,465 | 2,515 | ||||||
Accretion
of loss from convertible subordinated notes exchange offer
|
31 | 49 | ||||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
42 | 244 | ||||||
Compensatory
stock issuances
|
209 | 153 | ||||||
Loss
from disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
86 | - | ||||||
Reduction
of note receivable due for services received
|
130 | 130 | ||||||
Total
non-cash adjustments
|
8,411 | 5,417 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of
acquisitions:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(3,173 | ) | (10,219 | ) | ||||
Inventory
|
(419 | ) | (477 | ) | ||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
249 | 543 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
(1,020 | ) | (203 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable
|
1,625 | (1,997 | ) | |||||
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
(2,267 | ) | (2,939 | ) | ||||
Total
change in operating assets and liabilities
|
(5,005 | ) | (15,292 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used for operating activities
|
(10,999 | ) | (23,140 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Purchase
of plant and equipment
|
(4,985 | ) | (1,164 | ) | ||||
Investment
in unconsolidated affiliate
|
- | (13,734 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from employee notes receivable
|
- | 121 | ||||||
Proceeds
from notes receivable
|
- | 750 | ||||||
Funding
of restricted cash
|
(269 | ) | (224 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of marketable securities
|
(7,000 | ) | (10,875 | ) | ||||
Sale
of marketable securities
|
20,931 | 41,600 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
8,677 | 16,474 |
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Payments
on capital lease obligations
|
(2 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
4,776 | 256 | ||||||
Proceeds
from employee stock purchase plan
|
- | 202 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
4,774 | 441 | ||||||
Effect
of foreign currency
|
7 | - | ||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
2,459 | (6,225 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
12,151 | 22,592 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 14,610 | $ | 16,367 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for interest
|
$ | 2,349 | $ | 2,421 | ||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$ | - | $ | 1,701 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements.
EMCORE
Corporation
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
NOTE
1. Basis of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of EMCORE Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company” or “EMCORE”).
All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
These
statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim information,
and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial
statements. In the opinion of management, all information considered necessary
for a fair presentation of the financial statements has been included. Operating
results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may
be expected for an entire fiscal year. The condensed consolidated balance sheet
as of September 30, 2007 has been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements as of such date. For a more complete understanding of
EMCORE’s financial position, operating results, risk factors and other matters,
please refer to EMCORE's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007.
The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S.
GAAP requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period.
Management develops estimates based on historical experience and on various
assumptions about the future that are believed to be reasonable based on the
best information available. EMCORE’s reported financial position or results of
operations may be materially different under changed conditions or when using
different estimates and assumptions. In the event that estimates or assumptions
prove to differ from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods
to reflect more current information. Certain reclassifications have
occurred to the quarter ended December 31, 2006 to conform to the quarter ended
December 31, 2007. The reclassification consists of a reduction to
revenue of $78,000, a reduction to cost of goods sold of $64,000, and a
reduction to research and development expense of $14,000 from the amounts
previously recognized in first quarter of fiscal 2007. This
reclassification relates to a cost-sharing R&D arrangement, under which the
actual costs of performance are divided between the U.S. Government and EMCORE,
no revenue is recorded and the Company’s R&D expense is reduced for the
amount of the cost-sharing receipts.
For the
quarter ended December 31, 2007, options representing 5,096,185 shares of common
stock were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculations. For the
quarter ended December 31, 2006, options representing 3,166,199 shares of common
stock were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculations. These
options, along with the Company’s convertible subordinated notes, were not
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share in the periods as the
Company incurred a net loss for the period and any effect would have been
anti-dilutive.
NOTE
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
FIN 48 - In June
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation
No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No.
109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the
minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being
recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 applies to all tax
positions related to income taxes subject to SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
Differences between the amounts recognized in the statements of financial
position prior to the adoption of FIN 48 and the amounts reported after adoption
should be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded to the
beginning balance of retained earnings. FIN 48 was adopted by the Company on
October 1, 2007. See Note 13, “Income Taxes” of this Form 10-Q for
additional information, including the effects of adoption on the Company’s
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS 157 - In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(“SFAS”) 157, Fair Value
Measurements, which defines fair value, provides a framework for
measuring fair value, and expands the disclosures required for fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require
fair value measurements; it does not require any new fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007
and is required to be adopted by the Company on October 1, 2008. Although the
Company will continue to evaluate the application of SFAS 157, management does
not currently believe adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact
on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
SFAS 159 - In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No.
115. The fair value option permits entities to choose to measure eligible
financial instruments at fair value at specified election dates. The entity will
report unrealized gains and losses on the items on which it has elected the fair
value option in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007 and is required to be adopted by the Company on October 1,
2008. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of adopting SFAS 159, but
does not expect it to have a material impact on its consolidated results of
operations or financial condition.
SFAS 141(R) - In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), Business Combinations. This
Statement replaces SFAS 141, Business Combinations, and
requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed,
including those arising from contractual contingencies, any contingent
consideration, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the
acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited
exceptions specified in the statement. SFAS 141(R) also requires the acquirer in
a business combination achieved in stages (sometimes referred to as a step
acquisition) to recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as
the noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, at the full amounts of their fair
values (or other amounts determined in accordance with SFAS 141(R)). In
addition, SFAS 141(R)'s requirement to measure the noncontrolling interest in
the acquiree at fair value will result in recognizing the goodwill attributable
to the noncontrolling interest in addition to that attributable to the acquirer.
SFAS 141(R) amends SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
to require the acquirer to recognize changes in the amount of its deferred tax
benefits that are recognizable because of a business combination either in
income from continuing operations in the period of the combination or directly
in contributed capital, depending on the circumstances. It also amends SFAS 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, to, among other things, provide guidance on the impairment
testing of acquired research and development intangible assets and assets that
the acquirer intends not to use. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
Management is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of SFAS
141(R) could have on our financial statements.
SFAS 160 - In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements. SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research
Bulletin 51, Consolidated
Financial Statements, to establish accounting and reporting standards for
the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. It also clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is
an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as
equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 also changes the way
the consolidated income statement is presented by requiring consolidated net
income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both
the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the
face of the consolidated statement of income, of the amounts of consolidated net
income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. SFAS 160
requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary
is deconsolidated and requires expanded disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests
of the parent owners and the interests of the noncontrolling owners of a
subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal periods, and interim periods within
those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Management is
currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of SFAS 160 could
have on our financial statements.
NOTE
3. Equity
Stock
Options
EMCORE has stock option plans
to provide long-term incentives to eligible employees, officers, and directors
in the form of stock options. Most of the stock options vest and become
exercisable over four to five years and have ten-year terms. EMCORE maintains
two incentive stock option plans: the 2000 Stock Option Plan (“2000 Plan”), and
the 1995 Incentive and Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan (“1995 Plan” and,
together with the 2000 Plan, the “Option Plans”). The 1995 Plan authorizes the
grant of options to purchase up to 2,744,118 shares of EMCORE's common stock.
The 2000 Plan authorizes the grant of options to purchase up to 9,350,000 shares
of EMCORE's common stock. As of December 31, 2007, no options were available for
issuance under the 1995 Plan and 956,572 options were available for issuance
under the 2000 Plan. Certain options under the Option Plans are intended to
qualify as incentive stock options pursuant to Section 422A of the Internal
Revenue Code.
The following table
summarizes the activity under the Option Plans as of December 31, 2007, and
changes during the quarter then ended:
Number
of
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(in
years)
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
as of October 1, 2007
|
5,697,766
|
$
|
5.46
|
|||||||||
Granted
|
148,250
|
9.15
|
||||||||||
Exercised
|
(1,123,193
|
)
|
4.25
|
|||||||||
Tolled
|
658,989
|
5.19
|
||||||||||
Cancelled
|
(86,398
|
)
|
5.94
|
|||||||||
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2007
|
5,295,414
|
$
|
5.78
|
7.12
|
||||||||
Vested
and expected to vest as of December 31, 2007
|
3,759,653
|
$
|
5.59
|
6.65
|
||||||||
Exercisable
as of December 31, 2007
|
2,324,953
|
$
|
5.18
|
5.60
|
The
weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the three
months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $6.29 and $4.29, respectively. The total intrinsic value
of options exercised during the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 and 2007 was
$8.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The total fair value of
options vested during the first quarter of fiscal years 2008 and 2007 was $0.3
million and $1.4 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of fully
vested and expected to vest share options as of December 31, 2007 was $37.2
million. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable share options
as of December 31, 2007 was $24.3 million.
A summary
of the status of the company’s nonvested shares as of December 31, 2007, and
changes during the quarter then ended, is as follows:
Number
of
Shares
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant-
Date
Fair
Value
|
|||||||
Nonvested
as of October 1, 2007
|
2,979,486 | 4.82 | ||||||
Granted
|
148,250 | 6.29 | ||||||
Vested
|
(72,787 | ) | 3.66 | |||||
Forfeited
|
(84,488 | ) | 4.71 | |||||
Nonvested
as of December 31, 2007
|
2,970,461 | $ | 4.93 |
As of
December 31, 2007 there was $7.0 million of total unrecognized compensation
expense related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted
under the Option Plans. This expense is expected to be recognized over an
estimated weighted-average life of 2.56 years.
Stock-based
compensation expense is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the
award, over the requisite service period. As required by SFAS
123(R), Share-Based Payment
(revised 2004), management has made an estimate of expected forfeitures
and is recognizing compensation expense only for those equity awards expected to
vest. The effect of recording stock-based compensation expense during the three
months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was as follows (in thousands, except per
share data):
For
the
three
months ended
December
31, 2007
|
For
the
three
months ended
December
31, 2006
|
|||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense by award type:
|
||||||||
Employee
stock options
|
$
|
1,074
|
$
|
2,326
|
||||
Former
employee stock option tolling agreement
|
4,374
|
-
|
||||||
Total
stock-based compensation expense
|
$
|
5,448
|
$
|
2,326
|
||||
Net
effect on net loss per basic and diluted share
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
Former Employee Stock Option
Tolling Agreement
Under the
terms of option agreements issued under the 2000 Plan, terminated employees who
have vested and exercisable stock options have 90 days after the date of
termination to exercise the options. In November 2006, the Company announced
suspension of reliance on previously issued financial statements, which in turn
caused the Form S-8 registration statements for shares of common stock issuable
under the Option Plans not to be available. Therefore, terminated employees were
precluded from exercising their options during the remaining contractual
term. To address this issue EMCORE’s Board of Directors agreed in
April 2007 to approve an option grant “modification” for these individuals by
extending the normal 90-day exercise period after termination date to a date
after which EMCORE became compliant with its SEC filings and the registration of
the option shares was once again effective. The Company communicated
the terms of the tolling agreement with its terminated employees in November
2007. The Company’s Board of Directors approved an extension of the
stock option expiration date equal to the number of calendar days during the
Blackout Period before such option would have otherwise expired (the “Tolling
Period”). Former employees were able to exercise their vested
stock options beginning on the first day after the lifting of the Blackout
Period for a period equal to the Tolling Period. We accounted for the
modification of stock options issued to terminated employees as additional
compensation expense in accordance with SFAS 123(R) in the first quarter of
fiscal 2008 as presented in the table above.
Valuation
Assumptions
EMCORE
estimated the fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes model. The fair
value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option valuation model and the straight-line attribution approach
using the following weighted-average assumptions.
Black-Scholes
Weighted-Average Assumptions
|
For
the
three
months ended
December
31, 2007
|
|||
Expected
dividend yield
|
0.00
|
%
|
||
Expected
stock price volatility
|
81.34
|
%
|
||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
3.45
|
%
|
||
Expected
term (in years)
|
5.46
|
|||
Estimated
pre-vesting forfeitures
|
23.30
|
%
|
Expected Dividend
Yield: The Black-Scholes valuation model calls for a single
expected dividend yield as an input. EMCORE has not issued any
dividends.
Expected Stock Price
Volatility: The fair values of stock-based payments were
valued using the Black-Scholes valuation method with a volatility factor based
on EMCORE’s historical stock prices.
Risk-Free Interest
Rate: EMCORE bases the risk-free interest rate used in the
Black-Scholes valuation method on the implied yield currently available on U.S.
Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term. Where the
expected term of EMCORE’s stock-based awards do not correspond with the terms
for which interest rates are quoted, EMCORE performed a straight-line
interpolation to determine the rate from the available maturities.
Expected Term: EMCORE’s
expected term represents the period that EMCORE’s stock-based awards are
expected to be outstanding and was determined based on historical experience of
similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based
awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior as
influenced by changes to the terms of its stock-based awards.
Estimated Pre-vesting Forfeitures:
When estimating forfeitures, EMCORE considers voluntary termination
behavior as well as future workforce reduction programs, if any.
Preferred
Stock
EMCORE’s
restated certificate of incorporation authorizes the Board of Directors to issue
up to 5,882,352 shares of preferred stock of EMCORE upon such terms and
conditions having such rights, privileges and preferences as the Board of
Directors may determine. As of December 31, 2007 and September 30,
2007, no shares of preferred stock are issued or outstanding.
Employee Stock Purchase
Plan
In fiscal
2000, EMCORE adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). The ESPP
provides employees of EMCORE an opportunity to purchase common stock through
payroll deductions. The ESPP is a 6-month duration plan, with new participation
periods beginning the first business day of January and July of each year. The
purchase price is set at 85% of the average high and low market price for
EMCORE's common stock on either the first or last day of the participation
period, whichever is lower, and contributions are limited to the lower of 10% of
an employee's compensation or $25,000. In November 2006, the Company suspended
the ESPP due to its review of historical stock option granting
practices. The Company reinstated the ESPP on January 1,
2008. The number of shares of common stock available for issuance
under the ESPP is 2,000,000 shares.
The amount of shares
issued for the ESPP are as follows:
Number
of
Common
Stock
Shares
Issued
|
Purchase
Price
per
Common
Stock
Share
|
|||||||
Amount
of shares reserved for the ESPP
|
2,000,000
|
|||||||
Number
of shares issued in calendar years 2000 through 2003
|
(398,159
|
)
|
$ |
1.87
- $40.93
|
||||
Number
of shares issued in June 2004 for first half of calendar year
2004
|
(166,507
|
)
|
$ |
2.73
|
||||
Number
of shares issued in December 2004 for second half of calendar year
2004
|
(167,546
|
)
|
$ |
2.95
|
||||
Number
of shares issued in June 2005 for first half of calendar year
2005
|
(174,169
|
)
|
$ |
2.93
|
||||
Number
of shares issued in December 2005 for second half of calendar year
2005
|
(93,619
|
)
|
$ |
3.48
|
||||
Number
of shares issued in June 2006 for first half of calendar year
2006
|
(123,857
|
)
|
$ |
6.32
|
||||
Remaining
shares reserved for the ESPP as of December 31, 2007
|
876,143
|
Future
Issuances
As
of December 31, 2007, EMCORE had reserved a total of 19,314,786 shares of
its common stock for future issuances as follows:
Number
of
Common
Stock
Shares
Available
|
||||
For
exercise of outstanding common stock options
|
5,295,414
|
|||
For
conversion of subordinated notes
|
12,186,657
|
|||
For
future issuances to employees under the ESPP plan
|
876,143
|
|||
For
future common stock option awards
|
956,572
|
|||
Total
reserved
|
19,314,786
|
NOTE
4. Acquisition
On
December 17, 2007, EMCORE entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the
“Agreement”) with Intel Corporation (“Seller”) which is filed as Exhibit 2.1 to
this Form 10-Q. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company will
purchase certain of the assets of Seller and its subsidiaries relating to the
telecom portion of Seller’s Optical Platform Division for a purchase price of
$85 million, as adjusted based on an inventory true-up, plus specifically
assumed liabilities. The purchase price will be paid $75 million in
cash and $10 million in cash or common stock of the Company, at the Company’s
option.
The
Company and Seller each made certain representations, warranties and covenants
in the Agreement, including, among others, covenants by Seller to use
commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact the assets to be transferred
to the Company and to refrain from taking certain non-ordinary course
transactions during the period before consummation of the
transaction. The parties have agreed to enter into a transition
services agreement under which Seller will provide selected services to the
Company for a limited period after closing. The parties have also
entered into an intellectual property agreement under which Seller will license,
subject to certain conditions, certain related intellectual property to the
Company in connection with the Company’s use and development of the assets being
transferred to it.
The
Agreement contains termination rights for both the Company and Seller including
a provision allowing either party to terminate the Agreement if the transaction
has not been consummated by June 18, 2008.
NOTE
5. Restructuring Charges
As EMCORE
has acquired businesses and consolidated them into its existing operations,
EMCORE has incurred charges associated with the transition and integration of
those activities. In accordance with SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with
Exit or Disposal Activities, expenses recognized as restructuring charges
include costs associated with the integration of several business acquisitions
and EMCORE’s overall cost-reduction efforts. Restructuring
charges are included in SG&A. These charges primarily relate to
our Fiber Optics operating segment. These restructuring efforts are
expected to be completed in calendar year 2008. Costs incurred and
expected to be incurred consist of the following:
(in
thousands)
|
Amount
Incurred
in
Period
|
Cumulative
Amount
Incurred
to
Date
|
Amount
Expected
in
Future
Periods
|
Total
Amount
Expected
to
be
Incurred
|
||||||||||||
One-time
termination benefits
|
$ | 275 | $ | 3,454 | $ | 180 | $ | 3,634 |
The
following table sets forth changes in the accrual for restructuring charges
during the first quarter of fiscal year 2008:
(in
thousands)
|
||||
Balance
at October 1, 2007
|
$
|
2,112
|
||
Increase
in liability due to relocation of corporate headquarters
|
275
|
|||
Costs
paid or otherwise settled
|
(895
|
)
|
||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
$
|
1,492
|
NOTE
6. Receivables
The
components of accounts receivable consisted of the following:
(in
thousands)
|
As
of
December
31,
2007
|
As
of
September
30,
2007
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
$ | 36,827 | $ | 35,558 | ||||
Accounts
receivable – unbilled
|
5,253 | 3,395 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable, gross
|
42,080 | 38,953 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(798 | ) | (802 | ) | ||||
Total
accounts receivable, net
|
$ | 41,282 | $ | 38,151 |
Receivables
from a related party consisted of the following:
(in
thousands)
|
As
of
December
31,
2007
|
As
of
September
30,
2007
|
||||||
Velox
investment-related
|
$ | 332 | $ | 332 | ||||
Total
receivables from a related party
|
$ | 332 | $ | 332 |
NOTE
7. Inventory, net
Inventory
is stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined using the
standard cost method that includes material, labor and manufacturing overhead
costs. The components of inventory consisted of the
following:
(in
thousands)
|
As
of
December
31,
2007
|
As
of
September
30,
2007
|
||||||
Raw
materials
|
$ | 18,890 | $ | 19,884 | ||||
Work-in-process
|
7,592 | 6,842 | ||||||
Finished
goods
|
11,928 | 10,891 | ||||||
Inventory,
gross
|
38,410 | 37,617 | ||||||
Less:
reserves
|
(8,785 | ) | (8,412 | ) | ||||
Total
inventory, net
|
$ | 29,625 | $ | 29,205 |
NOTE
8. Property, Plant, and Equipment, net
The
components of property, plant, and equipment consisted of the
following:
(in
thousands)
|
As
of
December
31,
2007
|
As
of
September
30,
2007
|
||||||
Land
|
$ | 1,502 | $ | 1,502 | ||||
Building
and improvements
|
43,632 | 43,397 | ||||||
Equipment
|
76,498 | 75,631 | ||||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
5,709 | 5,643 | ||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
2,141 | 2,141 | ||||||
Construction
in progress
|
7,271 | 3,744 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, gross
|
136,753 | 132,058 | ||||||
Less:
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(76,459 | ) | (74,801 | ) | ||||
Total
property, plant and equipment, net
|
$ | 60,294 | $ | 57,257 |
As of
December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007, EMCORE did not have any significant
capital lease agreements. Depreciation expense was $1.7 million and
$2.4 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007,
respectively.
NOTE
9. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, net
The
following table sets forth changes in the carrying value of goodwill by
reportable segment during the first quarter of fiscal year 2008:
(in
thousands)
|
Fiber
Optics
|
Photovoltaics
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Balance
as of October 1, 2007
|
$ | 20,606 | $ | 20,384 | $ | 40,990 | ||||||
Acquisition
– earn-out payments
|
691 | - | 691 | |||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2007
|
$ | 21,297 | $ | 20,384 | $ | 41,681 |
The
following table sets forth changes in the carrying value of intangible assets,
consisting of patents and acquired intellectual property (“IP”), as of December
31, 2007 by reportable segment:
(in
thousands)
|
As of December 31,
2007
|
As of September 30,
2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross
Assets
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net
Assets
|
Gross
Assets
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net
Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Fiber
Optics:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patents
|
$ | 909 | $ | (403 | ) | $ | 506 | $ | 845 | $ | (358 | ) | $ | 487 | ||||||||||
Ortel
acquired IP
|
3,274 | (3,002 | ) | 272 | 3,274 | (2,893 | ) | 381 | ||||||||||||||||
JDSU
acquired IP
|
1,040 | (561 | ) | 479 | 1,040 | (512 | ) | 528 | ||||||||||||||||
Alvesta
acquired IP
|
193 | (193 | ) | - | 193 | (187 | ) | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
Molex
acquired IP
|
558 | (474 | ) | 84 | 558 | (446 | ) | 112 | ||||||||||||||||
Phasebridge
acquired IP
|
603 | (368 | ) | 235 | 603 | (347 | ) | 256 | ||||||||||||||||
Force
acquired IP
|
1,075 | (492 | ) | 583 | 1,075 | (443 | ) | 632 | ||||||||||||||||
K2
acquired IP
|
583 | (274 | ) | 309 | 583 | (248 | ) | 335 | ||||||||||||||||
Opticomm
acquired IP
|
2,504 | (494 | ) | 2,010 | 2,504 | (321 | ) | 2,183 | ||||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
10,739 | (6,261 | ) | 4,478 | 10,675 | (5,755 | ) | 4,920 | ||||||||||||||||
Photovoltaics:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patents
|
715 | (294 | ) | 421 | 615 | (260 | ) | 355 | ||||||||||||||||
Tecstar
acquired IP
|
1,900 | (1,900 | ) | - | 1,900 | (1,900 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
2,615 | (2,194 | ) | 421 | 2,515 | (1,888 | ) | 355 | ||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 13,354 | $ | (8,455 | ) | $ | 4,899 | $ | 13,190 | $ | (7,915 | ) | $ | 5,275 |
Based on
the carrying amount of the intangible assets, and assuming no future impairment
of the underlying assets, the estimated future amortization expense is as
follows:
(in
thousands)
|
||||
Period
ending:
|
||||
Nine-month
period ended September 30, 2008
|
$
|
1,194
|
||
Year
ended September 30, 2009
|
1,301
|
|||
Year
ended September 30, 2010
|
1,188
|
|||
Year
ended September 30, 2011
|
727
|
|||
Year
ended September 30, 2012
|
355
|
|||
Thereafter
|
134
|
|||
Total
future amortization expense
|
$
|
4,899
|
NOTE
10. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
The
components of accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the
following:
(in
thousands)
|
As
of
December
31,
2007
|
As
of
September
30,
2007
|
||||||
Compensation-related
|
$
|
7,957
|
$
|
8,398
|
||||
Interest
|
600
|
1,775
|
||||||
Warranty
|
1,361
|
1,310
|
||||||
Professional
fees
|
4,583
|
6,213
|
||||||
Royalty
|
1,031
|
705
|
||||||
Self
insurance
|
822
|
794
|
||||||
Deferred
revenue and customer deposits
|
649
|
687
|
||||||
Tax-related
|
4,657
|
3,460
|
||||||
Restructuring
accrual
|
1,492
|
2,112
|
||||||
Other
|
4,261
|
3,322
|
||||||
Total
accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
$
|
27,413
|
$
|
28,776
|
NOTE
11. Commitments and Contingencies
EMCORE
leases certain land, facilities, and equipment under non-cancelable operating
leases. The leases provide for rental adjustments for increases in base rent (up
to specific limits), property taxes, insurance and general property maintenance
that would be recorded as rent expense. Net facility and equipment rent expense
under such leases amounted to approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million for
the three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
As of
December 31, 2007, EMCORE had four standby letters of credit issued totaling
approximately $1.8 million.
Credit
Market Conditions
The
Company plans to fund the asset purchase of Intel’s Optical Platform Division
through (i) debt financing, (ii) equity financing and/or (iii) asset
sales. Currently, the U.S. capital markets are experiencing turbulent
conditions in the credit markets, as evidenced by tightening of lending
standards, reduced availability of credit vehicles accompanied by a reduction in
certain asset values. This potentially impacts EMCORE’s ability to
obtain this additional funding through financing or asset
sales. Although management believes it will be able to obtain the
funding necessary to fund the acquisition, despite the reduced availability of
these credit vehicles, no assurance can be made that the Company will be able to
finance the acquisition on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Legal
Proceedings
The
Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that are discussed
below. The Company is also subject to certain other legal proceedings and claims
that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and which have not been
fully adjudicated. The Company does not believe it has a potential
liability related to current legal proceedings and claims that could
individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on its financial
condition, liquidity or results of operations. However, the results of legal
proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Should the Company fail to
prevail in any legal matters or should several legal matters be resolved against
the Company in the same reporting period, the operating results of a particular
reporting period could be materially adversely affected.
SEC
Investigation
On
November 6, 2006, the Company informed the staff of the SEC of the Special
Committee’s investigation regarding the Company’s historical review of stock
option granting practices. After the Company’s initial contact with
the SEC, the SEC opened a non-public investigation concerning the Company’s
historic option granting practices since the Company’s initial public
offering. The Company has fully cooperated with the SEC’s
investigation. Although we cannot predict the outcome of this matter,
we do not expect that such matter will have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Shareholder
Derivative Litigation Relating to Historical Stock Option Practices
On
February 1, 2007, Plaintiff Lewis Edelstein filed a purported stockholder
derivative action (the “Federal Court Action”) on behalf of the Company against
certain of its present and former directors and officers (the “Individual
Defendants”), as well as the Company as nominal defendant, in the U.S. District
Court for the District of New Jersey, Edelstein v. Brodie, et.
al., Case No. 3:07-cv-00596-FLW-JJH (D.N.J.). On May 22,
2007, Plaintiffs Kathryn Gabaldon and Michael Sackrison each filed a purported
stockholder derivative action against the Individual Defendants, and the Company
as nominal defendant, in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Somerset County,
Gabaldon v. Brodie,
et. al., Case No. 3:07-cv-03185-FLW-JJH (D.N.J.) and Sackrison v. Brodie, et.
al., Case No. 3:07-cv-00596-FLW-JJH (D.N.J.) (collectively, the “State
Court Actions”).
Both the
Federal Court Action and the State Court Actions alleged, using essentially
identical contentions that the Individual Defendants engaged in improprieties
and violations of law in connection with the Company’s historical issuances of
stock options. Each of the actions seeks the same relief on behalf of
the Company, including, among other things, damages, equitable relief, corporate
governance reforms, an accounting, rescission, restitution and costs and
disbursements of the lawsuit. On July 10, 2007, the State Court
Actions were removed to the U.S. District Court for the District of New
Jersey.
On
September 26, 2007, the plaintiff in the Federal Court Action signed an
agreement in principle with the Individual Defendants and the Company to settle
that litigation in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”)
filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006. That same day, the plaintiffs in the State Court
Actions advised the Federal Court that the settlement embodied in the MOU would
also constitute the settlement of the State Court Actions.
The MOU
provides that the Company will adhere to certain policies and procedures
relating to the issuance of stock options, stock trading by directors, officers
and employees, the composition of its Board of Directors, and the functioning of
the Board’s Audit and Compensation Committees. The MOU also provides
for the payment of $700,000 relating to plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees, costs and
expenses, which the Company’s insurance carrier has committed to pay on behalf
of the Company.
On
November 28, 2007, a Stipulation of Compromise and Settlement (the
“Stipulation”) substantially embodying the terms previously contained in the MOU
was fully executed by the Company and the other defendants and the plaintiffs in
the Federal Court Action and the State Court Actions. The Stipulation was filed
as Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September
30, 2007.
The
Stipulation provides that the Company will adhere to certain policies and
procedures relating to the issuance of stock options, stock trading by
directors, officers and employees, the composition of its Board of Directors,
and the functioning of the Board’s Audit and Compensation
Committees. The Stipulation also provides for the payment of $700,000
relating to plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses, which the Company’s
insurance carrier has committed to pay on behalf of the Company. A
motion to approve the settlement reflected in the Stipulation was filed with the
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on December 3,
2007. The Court granted the motion for preliminary approval of
the settlement on January 3, 2008. In the order of preliminary
approval, the Court required the Company to provide notice to shareholders by
February 14, 2008 and to set a date for a hearing for final approval of the
settlement for March 28, 2008. Upon such approval the settlement will
become final and binding on all parties and represent a final settlement of both
the Federal Court Action and the State Court Actions.
We have
recorded $700,000 as a liability for the stipulated settlement in fiscal year
2006 since events that led to the litigation existed as of that
date. Although we anticipate that our insurance carrier will cover
the stipulated settlement, we have not recorded any receivable, or gain
contingency, since the settlement is still contingent upon certain future
events.
Indemnification
Obligations
Subject
to certain limitations, we are obligated to indemnify our current and former
directors, officers and employees in connection with the Special Committee’s
investigation of our historical stock option practices, the related SEC
non-public investigation and shareholder litigation. These obligations arise
under the terms of our restated certificate of incorporation, our bylaws,
applicable contracts, and New Jersey law. The obligation to indemnify generally
means that we are required to pay or reimburse the individuals’ reasonable legal
expenses and possibly damages and other liabilities incurred in connection with
these matters. We are currently paying or reimbursing legal expenses being
incurred in connection with these matters by a number of our current and former
directors, officers and employees. The maximum potential amount of future
payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification
agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has a director and officer
liability insurance policies that limits its exposure and enables it to recover
a portion of any future amounts paid.
Intellectual
Property Lawsuits
We
protect our proprietary technology by applying for patents where appropriate and
in other cases by preserving the technology, related know-how and information as
trade secrets. The success and competitive position of our product lines is
significantly impacted by our ability to obtain intellectual property protection
for our R&D efforts.
We have,
from time to time, exchanged correspondence with third parties regarding the
assertion of patent or other intellectual property rights in connection with
certain of our products and processes. Additionally, on September 11, 2006, we
filed a lawsuit against Optium Corporation (Optium) in the U.S. District Court
for the Western District of Pennsylvania for patent infringement. In the suit,
EMCORE and JDS Uniphase Corporation (JDSU) allege that Optium is infringing on
U.S. patents 6,282,003 and 6,490,071 with its Prisma II 1550nm transmitters. On
March 14, 2007, following denial of a motion to add additional claims to its
existing lawsuit, EMCORE and JDSU filed a second patent suit in the same court
against Optium alleging infringement of JDSU's patent 6,519,374 ("the '374
patent"). On March 15, 2007, Optium filed a declaratory judgment
action against EMCORE and JDSU. Optium seeks in this litigation a declaration
that certain products of Optium do not infringe the '374 patent and that the
patent is invalid. The '374 patent is assigned to JDSU and licensed to
EMCORE.
On
December 20, 2007, the Company was served with a complaint in another
declaratory relief action which Optium had filed in the Federal District Court
for the Western District of Pennsylvania. This action seeks to have
U.S. patents 6,282,003 and 6,490,071 declared invalid or unenforceable because
of certain conduct alleged to have occurred in connection with the grant of
these patents. These allegations are substantially the same as those
brought by Optium by motion in the Company’s own case against Optium, which
motion had been denied by the Court. The Company intends to assert
that the allegations in the complaint are without merit and intends to contest
them.
NOTE
12. Segment Data and Related Information
EMCORE
has four operating segments: (1) EMCORE Fiber Optics and (2) EMCORE Broadband,
which are aggregated as a separate reporting segment, Fiber Optics, and (3)
EMCORE Photovoltaics and (4) EMCORE Solar Power, which are aggregated as a
separate reporting segment, Photovoltaics. EMCORE's Fiber Optics
revenue is derived primarily from sales of optical components and subsystems for
cable television (“CATV”), fiber to the premise (“FTTP”), enterprise routers and
switches, telecom grooming switches, core routers, high performance servers,
supercomputers, and satellite communications data links. EMCORE's
Photovoltaics revenue is derived primarily from the sales of solar power
conversion products, including solar cells, covered interconnect solar cells,
and solar panels. EMCORE evaluates its reportable segments in
accordance with SFAS 131, Disclosures About Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. EMCORE’s Chief Executive Officer is
EMCORE’s Chief Operating Decision Maker pursuant to SFAS 131, and he allocates
resources to segments based on their business prospects, competitive factors,
net revenue, operating results and other non-GAAP financial ratios.
The
following table sets forth the revenue and percentage of total revenue
attributable to each of EMCORE's reporting segments for the three months ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006.
(in
thousands)
Segment
Revenue
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
%
of
Revenue
|
Revenue
|
%
of
Revenue
|
|||||||||||||
Fiber
Optics
|
$ | 33,960 | 72 | % | $ | 25,322 | 66 | % | ||||||||
Photovoltaics
|
12,927 | 28 | 13,274 | 34 | ||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$ | 46,887 | 100 | % | $ | 38,596 | 100 | % |
The
following table sets forth EMCORE's consolidated revenues by geographic region
for the three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. Revenue was
assigned to geographic regions based on the customers’ or contract
manufacturers’ billing address.
(in
thousands)
Geographic
Revenue
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
%
of
Revenue
|
Revenue
|
%
of
Revenue
|
|||||||||||||
North
America
|
$ | 26,823 | 57 | % | $ | 25,746 | 67 | % | ||||||||
Asia
and South America
|
15,340 | 33 | 11,036 | 28 | ||||||||||||
Europe
|
4,587 | 10 | 1,814 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Australia
|
137 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$ | 46,887 | 100 | % | $ | 38,596 | 100 | % |
The
following table sets forth operating losses attributable to each EMCORE
reporting segment and to corporate for the three months ended December 31, 2007
and 2006.
(in
thousands)
Statement
of Operations Data
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Operating
loss by segment and corporate:
|
||||||||
Fiber
Optics
|
$ | (3,527 | ) | $ | (6,205 | ) | ||
Photovoltaics
|
(3,551 | ) | (3,996 | ) | ||||
Corporate
|
(6,476 | ) | (3,453 | ) | ||||
Operating
loss
|
(13,554 | ) | (13,654 | ) | ||||
Other
expenses (income):
|
||||||||
Interest
expense (income), net
|
778 | (389 | ) | |||||
Loss
on disposal of equipment
|
86 | - | ||||||
Foreign
exchange gain
|
(13 | ) | - | |||||
Total
other expenses (income)
|
851 | (389 | ) | |||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (14,405 | ) | $ | (13,265 | ) |
Long-lived
assets (consisting of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible
assets) for each reporting segment are as follows:
(in
thousands)
Long-lived
Assets
|
As
of
December
31,
2007
|
As
of
September
30,
2007
|
||||||
Fiber
Optics
|
$ | 57,131 | $ | 56,816 | ||||
Photovoltaics
|
49,743 | 46,706 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 106,874 | $ | 103,522 |
NOTE
13. Income Taxes
Effective
October 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48. As a result of the adoption
of FIN 48, the Company recorded an increase in accumulated deficit and an
increase in the liability for unrecognized state tax benefits of approximately
$326,000 (net of the federal benefit for state tax liabilities). All of this
amount, if recognized, would reduce future income tax provisions and favorably
impact effective tax rates. During the quarter ended December 31, 2007, there
were no material increases or decreases in unrecognized tax
benefits. Management expects that over the next twelve months the
liability for unrecognized state tax benefits will substantially decrease and
does not anticipate any material increases over the next twelve
months.
The
Company’s historical accounting policy with respect to interest and penalties
related to tax uncertainties has been to classify these amounts as income taxes,
and the Company continued this classification upon the adoption of FIN 48.
At December 31, 2007, the Company had approximately $117,000 of interest and
penalties accrued as tax liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet.
The
Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal, state and local
jurisdictions. No federal, state and local income tax returns are
currently under examination. Certain income tax returns for fiscal years 2004
through 2006 remain open to examination by U.S. federal, state and local tax
authorities.
NOTE
14. Subsequent Event
Conversion of Convertible
Subordinated Notes
The
Company may redeem some or all of its convertible notes, at par value, if the
closing price of the Company's common stock exceeds $12.09 per share for at
least twenty trading days within a period of any thirty consecutive trading days
ending on the trading day prior to the date of mailing the notice of
redemption. The notice of redemption must be mailed to the holders of
the convertible notes at least 20 days but not more than 60 days before the
redemption date. Once the notice of redemption is mailed by the
Company to the holders of its convertible notes, the convertible notes become
irrevocably due and payable on the redemption date. Each of the
indentures governing the convertible notes requires the Company to deposit funds
sufficient to cover the redemption price of, plus accrued and unpaid interest
on, the convertible notes to be redeemed with the Trustee one business day prior
to the redemption date. The holders of the convertible notes can
convert the convertible notes into shares of the Company’s common stock at any
time before maturity, or with respect to convertible notes called for
redemption, until the close of business on the business day immediately
preceding the redemption date. The number of shares issuable upon
conversion is determined by dividing the principal amount to be converted by the
conversion price in effect on the conversion date. The conversion
price is $7.01, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments.
On
January 29, 2008, the Company, in privately negotiated transactions, entered
into separate agreements with holders of approximately 97.5%, or approximately
$83.3 million aggregate principal amount, of its outstanding 5.50% convertible
senior subordinated notes due 2011 (the “Notes”) pursuant to which this small
number of holders converted their Notes into the Company’s common
stock. Upon conversion of the Notes, the Company will
issue 11.9 million shares of its common stock, based on a conversion price
of $7.01, in accordance with the terms of the Notes. The issuance of
the Company’s common stock upon conversion of the Notes will be made in
reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements provided under
Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933. To incentivize
the holders to convert their Notes, the Company made cash payments to such
holders equal to 4% of the principal amount of the Notes converted, or $3.3
million, plus accrued interest of approximately $1.0 million on the Notes
converted. This supplemental payment will be charged to expense in
the second quarter of fiscal 2008, along with the acceleration of deferred
financing costs of approximately $0.7 million. After giving effect to
these transactions, the Company expects to have approximately 64 million shares
of common stock outstanding.
In
addition, on January 29, 2008, the Company called for redemption all of its
outstanding Notes. After giving effect to the conversions, the
Company expects that approximately $2.1 million aggregate principal amount of
Notes will remain outstanding and subject to redemption. The redemption date
will be February 20, 2008, and the redemption price, will be 100% of the
principal amount of the Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but
not including, the redemption date. The closing price of EMCORE's
common stock on January 29, 2008 was $11.77. Note holders who wish to convert
their Notes must do so by the close of business on February 19,
2008.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the
Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are based largely on our
current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends
affecting the financial condition of our business. These forward-looking
statements may be identified by the use of terms and phrases such as "expects",
"anticipates", "intends", "plans", believes", "estimates", “targets”, “can”,
“may”, “could”, “will”, and variations of these terms and similar phrases.
Management cautions that these forward-looking statements are subject to
business, economic, and other risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown,
that may cause actual results to be materially different from those discussed in
these forward-looking statements. The cautionary statements made in this Report
should be read as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever
they appear in this Report. This discussion should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements, including the related notes.
These
forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any and all statements
or implications regarding:
|
·
|
The ability of EMCORE
Corporation (the “Company”, “we”, or “EMCORE”) to remain competitive and a
leader in its industry and the future growth of the company, the industry,
and the economy in general;
|
|
·
|
Difficulties in integrating
recent or future acquisitions into our
operations;
|
|
·
|
The expected level and timing
of benefits to EMCORE from on-going cost reduction efforts, including (i)
expected cost reductions and their impact on our financial performance,
(ii) our continued leadership in technology and manufacturing in its
markets, and (iii) our belief that the cost reduction efforts will not
impact product development or manufacturing
execution;
|
|
·
|
Expected improvements in our
product and technology development
programs;
|
|
·
|
Whether our products will (i)
be successfully introduced or marketed, (ii) be qualified and purchased by
our customers, or (iii) perform to any particular specifications or
performance or reliability standards;
and/or
|
|
·
|
Guidance provided by EMCORE
regarding our expected financial performance in current or future periods,
including, without limitation, with respect to anticipated revenues,
income, or cash flows for any period in fiscal 2008 and subsequent
periods.
|
These
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those projected, including without
limitation, the following:
|
·
|
EMCORE’s cost reduction
efforts may not be successful in achieving their expected benefits, or may
negatively impact our
operations;
|
|
·
|
The failure of our products
(i) to perform as expected without material defects, (ii) to be
manufactured at acceptable volumes, yields, and cost, (iii) to be
qualified and accepted by our customers, and (iv) to successfully compete
with products offered by our competitors;
and/or
|
|
·
|
Other risks and uncertainties
described in EMCORE’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) such as: cancellations, rescheduling, or delays in product
shipments; manufacturing capacity constraints; lengthy sales and
qualification cycles; difficulties in the production process; changes in
semiconductor industry growth; increased competition; delays in developing
and commercializing new products; and other
factors.
|
Neither
management nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and
completeness of the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are
made only as of the date of this Report and subsequent facts or circumstances
may contradict, obviate, undermine, or otherwise fail to support or substantiate
such statements. We assume no obligation to update the matters discussed in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to conform such statements to actual results or to
changes in our expectations, except as required by applicable law or
regulation.
Business
Overview
EMCORE is
a leading provider of compound semiconductor-based components and subsystems for
the broadband, fiber optic, satellite and terrestrial solar power
markets. We have two reporting segments: Fiber Optics and
Photovoltaics. EMCORE's Fiber Optics segment offers optical
components, subsystems and systems that enable the transmission of video, voice
and data over high-capacity fiber optic cables for high-speed data and
telecommunications, cable television (“CATV”) and fiber-to-the-premises (“FTTP”)
networks. EMCORE's Photovoltaics segment provides solar products for
satellite and terrestrial applications. For satellite applications, EMCORE
offers high-efficiency compound semiconductor-based gallium arsenide (“GaAs”)
solar cells, covered interconnect cells (“CICs”) and fully integrated solar
panels. For terrestrial applications, EMCORE offers its
high-efficiency GaAs solar cells and integrated PV components for use in solar
power concentrator systems. For specific information about our
company, our products or the markets we serve, please visit our website at
http://www.emcore.com. The information on our website is not
incorporated into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We were
established in 1984 as a New Jersey corporation.
Management
Summary
Our
principal objective is to maximize shareholder value by leveraging our expertise
in advanced compound semiconductor technologies to be a leading provider of
high-performance, cost-effective product solutions in each of the markets we
serve.
We target
market opportunities that we believe have large potential growth and where the
favorable performance characteristics of our products and high volume production
efficiencies may give us a competitive advantage over our
competitors. We believe that as compound semiconductor production
costs continue to be reduced, existing and new customers will be compelled to
increase their use of these products because of their attractive performance
characteristics and superior value.
With
several strategic acquisitions and divestures in the past year, EMCORE has
developed a strong business focus and comprehensive product portfolios in two
main sectors: Fiber Optics and Photovoltaics.
Fiber
Optics
Our fiber
optics products enable information that is encoded on light signals to be
transmitted, routed (switched) and received in communication systems and
networks. Our fiber optics products provide our customers with
increased capacity to offer more services, at increased data transmission
distance, speed and bandwidth with lower noise video receive and lower power
consumption. Our Fiber Optics segment primarily targets the following
markets:
|
·
|
Cable Television (CATV)
Networks - We are a market leader in providing radio frequency (RF)
over fiber products for the CATV industry. Our products are
used in hybrid fiber coaxial (HFC) networks that enable cable service
operators to offer multiple advanced services to meet the expanding demand
for high-speed Internet, on-demand and interactive video and other
advanced services, such as high-definition television (HDTV) and voice
over IP (VoIP).
|
|
·
|
Fiber-to-the-Premises (FTTP)
Networks - Telecommunications companies are increasingly extending
their optical infrastructure to the customer’s location in order to
deliver higher bandwidth services. We have developed and maintain customer
qualified FTTP components and subsystem products to support plans by
telephone companies to offer voice, video and data services through the
deployment of new fiber-based access
networks.
|
|
·
|
Data Communications
Networks - We provide leading-edge optical components and modules
for data applications that enable switch-to-switch, router-to-router and
server-to-server backbone connections at aggregate speeds of 10 gigabits
per second (G) and above.
|
|
·
|
Telecommunications
Networks - Our leading-edge optical components and modules enable
high-speed (up to an aggregate 40G) optical interconnections that drive
advanced architectures in next-generation carrier class switching and
routing networks. Our products are used in equipment in the
network core and key metro optical nodes of voice telephony and Internet
infrastructures.
|
|
·
|
Satellite Communications
(Satcom) Networks - We are a leading provider of optical components
and systems for use in equipment that provides high-performance optical
data links for the terrestrial portion of satellite communications
networks.
|
|
·
|
Storage Area Networks -
Our high performance optical components are also used in high-end data
storage solutions to improve the performance of the storage
infrastructure.
|
|
·
|
Video Transport - Our
video transport product line offers solutions for broadcasting,
transportation, IP television (IPTV), mobile video and security &
surveillance applications over private and public networks. EMCORE’s
video, audio, data and RF transmission systems serve both analog and
digital requirements, providing cost-effective, flexible solutions geared
for network reconstruction and
expansion.
|
|
·
|
Defense and Homeland
Security - Leveraging our expertise in RF module design and
high-speed parallel optics, we provide a suite of ruggedized products that
meet the reliability and durability requirements of the U.S. Government
and defense markets. Our specialty defense products include
fiber optic gyro components used in precision guided munitions, ruggedized
parallel optic transmitters and receivers, high-frequency RF fiber optic
link components for towed decoy systems, optical delay lines for radar
systems, EDFAs, terahertz spectroscopy systems and other
products.
|
|
·
|
Consumer Products - We
intend to extend our optical technology into the consumer market by
integrating our Vertical Cavity Surface-Emitting Lasers (“VCSELs”) into
optical computer mice and ultra short data links. We are in
production with customers on several products and currently qualifying our
products with additional customers. An optical computer mouse
with laser illumination is superior to LED-based illumination in that it
reveals surface structures that a LED light source cannot uncover. VCSELs
enable computer mice to track with greater accuracy, on more surfaces and
with greater responsiveness than existing LED-based
solutions.
|
Photovoltaics
We
believe our high-efficiency compound semiconductor-based multi-junction solar
cell products provide our customers with compelling cost and performance
advantages over traditional silicon-based solutions. These include
higher solar cell efficiency allowing for greater conversion of light into
electricity, an increased ability to benefit from use in solar concentrator
systems, ability to withstand high heat environments and reduced overall
footprint. Our Photovoltaics segment primarily targets the following
markets:
|
·
|
Satellite Solar Power
Generation. We are a leader in providing solar power
generation solutions to the global communications satellite industry and
U.S. Government space programs. A satellite’s operational
success and corresponding revenue depend on its available power and its
capacity to transmit data. We manufacture advanced compound
semiconductor-based solar cell and solar panel products, which are more
resistant to radiation levels in space and generate substantially more
power from sunlight than silicon-based solutions. Space power
systems using our multi-junction solar cells weigh less per unit of power
than traditional silicon-based solar cells. These performance
characteristics increase satellite useful life, increase satellites’
transmission capacity and reduce launch costs. Our products
provide our customers with higher sunlight to electrical power conversion
efficiency for reduced size and launch costs; higher radiation tolerance;
and longer lifetime in harsh space environments. We design and
manufacture multi-junction compound semiconductor-based solar cells for
both commercial and military satellite applications. We currently
manufacture and sell one of the most efficient and reliable, radiation
resistant advanced triple-junction solar cells in the world, with an
average "beginning of life" efficiency of 28.5%. In May 2007,
EMCORE announced that it has attained solar conversion efficiency of 31%
for an entirely new class of advanced multi-junction solar cells optimized
for space applications. EMCORE is also the only manufacturer to
supply true monolithic bypass diodes for shadow protection, utilizing
several EMCORE patented methods. EMCORE also provides covered interconnect
cells (CICs) and solar panel lay-down services, giving us the capability
to manufacture complete solar panels. We can provide satellite
manufacturers with proven integrated satellite power solutions that
considerably improve satellite economics. Satellite manufacturers and
solar array integrators rely on EMCORE to meet their satellite power needs
with our proven flight heritage.
|
|
·
|
Terrestrial Solar Power
Generation. Solar power generation systems use
photovoltaic cells to convert sunlight to electricity and have been used
in space programs and, to a lesser extent, in terrestrial applications for
several decades. The market for terrestrial solar power
generation solutions has grown significantly as solar power generation
technologies improve in efficiency, as global prices for non-renewable
energy sources (i.e., fossil fuels) continue to rise, and as concern has
increased regarding the effect of carbon emissions on global warming.
Terrestrial solar power generation has emerged as one of the most rapidly
expanding renewable energy sources due to certain advantages solar power
holds over other energy sources, including reduced environmental impact,
elimination of fuel price risk, installation flexibility, scalability,
distributed power generation (i.e., electric power is generated at the
point of use rather than transmitted from a central station to the user),
and reliability. The rapid increase in demand for solar power has created
a growing need for highly efficient, reliable and cost-effective solar
power concentrator systems.
|
EMCORE
has adapted its high-efficiency compound semiconductor-based multi-junction
solar cell products for terrestrial applications, which are intended for use
with solar concentrator systems in utility-scale installations. In
August 2007, EMCORE announced that it has obtained 39% peak conversion
efficiency on its terrestrial concentrating solar cell products currently in
volume production. This compares favorably to typical efficiency of
15-21% on silicon-based solar cells and 35% for competing multi-junction
concentrating solar cells. We believe that solar concentrator systems assembled
using our compound semiconductor-based solar cells will be competitive with
silicon-based solar power generation systems because they are more efficient
and, when combined with the advantages of concentration, we believe will result
in a lower cost of power generated. Our multi-junction solar cell
technology is not subject to silicon shortages, which have led to increasing
prices in the raw materials required for silicon-based solar cells. While the
terrestrial power generation market is still developing, we have received
production orders from multiple CPV systems integrators and provided samples to
several others, including major system manufacturers in the United States,
Europe and Asia. Recent announcements from the Company
include:
|
·
|
On
December 12, 2007, EMCORE announced that it signed a memorandum of
understanding for the supply of 60 Megawatts (MW) of solar power systems
that are scheduled for deployment in Ontario, Canada over the next three
years. EMCORE will supply and install turn-key solar power systems in the
Sault Ste Marie area utilizing EMCORE's CPV systems developed at its
Albuquerque, NM facility. EMCORE also has the right to substitute other
solar technologies in portions of the projects. The project developer, Pod
Generating Group (PGG), has secured the licenses and permits for the
project through the Ontario Power Authority Standard Offer Program and
system deployment is expected to begin in mid-2008. PGG is a developer of
photovoltaics-based power generation facilities in Northern Ontario,
Canada.
|
|
·
|
On
December 17, 2007, EMCORE announced that it has received a purchase order
to supply 5.7 MW of EMCORE's CPV systems for alternative energy projects
in South Korea, along with a letter of intent for follow-on projects of
14.3 MW, expected to be released within the next six months. EMCORE also
signed an agreement with DI Semicon, a semiconductor packaging company in
Seoul, Korea, regarding the formation of a joint venture among DI Semicon,
EMCORE and other parties. This joint venture, when fully established and
commenced operations, will manufacture CPV systems in Korea for EMCORE,
including systems for the 14.3 MW follow-up projects described above and
will also involve a minimum purchase commitment of 15 MW annually of
EMCORE CPV systems to be deployed in South
Korea.
|
|
·
|
On
January 23, 2008, EMCORE announced that it will supply its solar
Concentrator Photovoltaic (CPV) components and systems to the Spanish
market through several agreements.
|
• EMCORE
was awarded a 300-kilowatt (kW) CPV system contract by Spain’s Institute of
Concentrator Photovoltaics Systems (ISFOC). EMCORE expects to have its CPV
systems installed in Castilla-La Mancha, Spain by December 2008.
• EMCORE
reached an agreement to construct an 850-kW solar power park in Extremadura,
Spain. EMCORE will be utilizing its CPV solar power system and provide a
turn-key solution with a scope of work including engineering, procurement, and
construction (EPC). This project is expected to be completed before July 2008 in
order to take advantage of the current high feed-in tariff.
• EMCORE
received a purchase order for one million CPV components from a prominent CPV
system integrator. This order is expected to be completed by March 2009 with CPV
products being deployed in projects within the Spanish market.
|
·
|
On
January 31, 2008, EMCORE announced that it has signed a memorandum of
understanding for the supply of between 200 MW and 700 MW of solar power
systems that are scheduled for deployment in utility scale solar power
projects under development in the southwestern region of the United
States. EMCORE will supply and install turn-key solar power systems
utilizing EMCORE's concentrating photovoltaic (CPV) systems developed at
its Albuquerque, NM facility. The project developer, SunPeak Solar, is
securing land and grid access throughout 2008 and project construction is
expected to begin in early 2009. This agreement is not expected to
contribute revenues until 2009 and is dependant on the renewal of the
federal investment tax credit (ITC) extending into 2009 and
beyond.
|
We are
committed to the ongoing evaluation of strategic opportunities that can expand
our addressable markets and strengthen our competitive position. Where
appropriate, we will acquire additional products, technologies, or businesses
that are complementary to, or broaden the markets in which we operate. We plan
to pursue strategic acquisitions, investments, and partnerships to increase
revenue and allow for higher overhead absorption that will improve our gross
margins.
Recent
acquisition activity includes:
|
·
|
On
December 17, 2007, EMCORE entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with
Intel Corporation (“Seller”). Under the terms of the Agreement,
EMCORE will purchase certain of the assets of Seller and its subsidiaries
relating to the telecom portion of Seller’s Optical Platform Division for
a purchase price of $85 million, as adjusted based on an inventory
true-up, plus specifically assumed liabilities. The purchase
price will be paid $75 million in cash and $10 million in cash or common
stock of EMCORE, at our option. The Agreement contains
termination rights for both EMCORE and Seller, including a provision
allowing either party to terminate the Agreement if the transaction has
not been consummated by June 18,
2008.
|
This acquired
business, when consummated, will be part of EMCORE's Fiber Optics reporting
segment.
EMCORE is
committed to achieving profitability by increasing revenue through the
introduction of new products, reducing our cost structure and lowering the
breakeven points of our product lines. We have significantly
streamlined our manufacturing operations by focusing on core competencies to
identify cost efficiencies. Where appropriate, we transferred the manufacturing
of certain product lines to contract manufacturers.
In May
2007, EMCORE announced the opening of a new manufacturing facility in Langfang,
China. Our new company, Langfang EMCORE Optoelectronics Co. Ltd., is located
approximately 20 miles southeast of Beijing and currently occupies a space of
22,000 square feet with a Class-10,000 clean room for optoelectronic device
packaging. Another 60,000 square feet is available for future
expansion. We will transfer our most cost sensitive optoelectronic
devices to this facility. This facility, along with a strategic
alignment with our existing contract-manufacturing partners, should enable us to
improve our cost structure and gross margins. We also expect to develop and
provide improved service to our global customers using a local presence in
Asia.
EMCORE’s
restructuring programs are designed to further reduce the number of
manufacturing facilities, in addition to the divesture or exit from selected
businesses and product lines that were not strategic and/or were not capable of
achieving desired revenue or profitability goals. Recent facility
consolidations include:
|
·
|
In
August 2007, we announced the consolidation of our North American fiber
optics engineering and design centers into our main operating sites.
EMCORE's engineering facilities in Virginia, Illinois, and northern
California were consolidated into larger primary sites in Albuquerque, New
Mexico and Alhambra, California. The consolidation of these engineering
sites should allow EMCORE to leverage resources within engineering, new
product introduction, and customer service. The design centers
in Virginia and northern California have been closed and the design center
in Illinois was vacated in October
2007.
|
|
·
|
In
October 2006, we announced the move of our corporate headquarters from
Somerset, New Jersey to Albuquerque, New Mexico. Financial
operations and records have been transferred and the New Jersey facility
was vacated in September 2007.
|
Our
results of operations and financial condition have and will continue to be
significantly affected by severance and restructuring charges, impairment of
long-lived assets and idle facility expenses incurred during facility closing
activities. Please refer to Risk Factors under Item 1A and Financial
Statements and Supplemental Data under Item 8 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, for further discussion of these
items.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reported period. Management develops estimates based on
historical experience and on various assumptions about the future that are
believed to be reasonable based on the best information available. EMCORE’s
reported financial position or results of operations may be materially different
under changed conditions or when using different estimates and assumptions,
particularly with respect to significant accounting policies, which are
discussed below. In the event that estimates or assumptions prove to differ from
actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more
current information. EMCORE's most significant estimates relate to accounts
receivable, inventory, goodwill, intangibles, other long-lived assets, warranty
accruals, revenue recognition, and valuation of stock-based
compensation.
Valuation of Accounts
Receivable. EMCORE regularly evaluates the collectibility of its accounts
receivable and accordingly maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for
estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to meet their
financial obligations to us. The allowance is based on the age of receivables
and a specific identification of receivables considered at risk. EMCORE
classifies charges associated with the allowance for doubtful accounts as
SG&A expense. If the financial condition of our customers were to
deteriorate, additional allowances may be required.
Valuation of
Inventory. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost
being determined using the standard cost method. EMCORE reserves against
inventory once it has been determined that: (i) conditions exist that may not
allow the inventory to be sold for its intended purpose, (ii) the inventory’s
value is determined to be less than cost, or (iii) the inventory is determined
to be obsolete. The charge related to inventory reserves is recorded as a cost
of revenue. The majority of the inventory write-downs are related to estimated
allowances for inventory whose carrying value is in excess of net realizable
value and on excess raw material components resulting from finished product
obsolescence. In most cases where EMCORE sells previously written down
inventory, it is typically sold as a component part of a finished product. The
finished product is sold at market price at the time resulting in higher average
gross margin on such revenue. EMCORE does not track the selling price of
individual raw material components that have been previously written down or
written off, since such raw material components usually are only a portion of
the resultant finished products and related sales price. EMCORE evaluates
inventory levels at least quarterly against sales forecasts on a significant
part-by-part basis, in addition to determining its overall inventory risk.
Reserves are adjusted to reflect inventory values in excess of forecasted sales,
as well as overall inventory risk assessed by management. We have incurred, and
may in the future incur, charges to write-down our inventory. While we believe,
based on current information, that the amount recorded for inventory is properly
reflected on our balance sheet, if market conditions are less favorable than our
forecasts, our future sales mix differs from our forecasted sales mix, or actual
demand from our customers is lower than our estimates, we may be required to
record additional inventory write-downs.
Valuation of Goodwill and
Intangible Assets. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price
of an acquired business or assets over the fair value of the identifiable assets
acquired and liabilities assumed. Intangible assets consist primarily of
intellectual property that has been internally developed or purchased. Purchased
intangible assets include existing and core technology, trademarks and trade
names, and customer contracts. Intangible assets are amortized using the
straight-lined method over estimated useful lives ranging from one to fifteen
years.
EMCORE
evaluates its goodwill and intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis,
or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value
may not be recoverable. Circumstances that could trigger an impairment test
include but are not limited to: a significant adverse change in the business
climate or legal factors; an adverse action or assessment by a regulator;
unanticipated competition; loss of key personnel; the likelihood that a
reporting unit or significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or
otherwise disposed; results of testing for recoverability of a significant asset
group within a reporting unit; and recognition of a goodwill impairment loss in
the financial statements of a subsidiary that is a component of a reporting
unit. The determination as to whether a write-down of goodwill or intangible
assets is necessary involves significant judgment based on the short-term and
long-term projections of the future performance of the reporting unit to which
the goodwill or intangible assets are attributed. As of December 31, 2006, we
tested for impairment on our goodwill and intangible assets and based on that
analysis, we determined that the carrying amount of the reporting units did not
exceed their fair value. The Company will conduct its annual test for
impairment during the quarter ended March 31, 2008 utilizing balances as of
December 31, 2007.
Valuation of Long-lived
Assets. EMCORE reviews long-lived assets on an annual basis or whenever
events or circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. A long-lived
asset is considered impaired when its anticipated undiscounted cash flow is less
than its carrying value. In making this determination, EMCORE uses certain
assumptions, including, but not limited to: (a) estimates of the fair market
value of these assets; and (b) estimates of future cash flows expected to be
generated by these assets, which are based on additional assumptions such as
asset utilization, length of service that assets will be used in our operations,
and estimated salvage values. As of December 31, 2006, we tested for impairment
of our long-lived assets and based on that analysis, we recorded no impairment
charges on any of EMCORE’s long-lived assets. The Company will conduct its
annual test for impairment during the quarter ended March 31, 2008 utilizing
balances as of December 31, 2007.
Product Warranty
Reserves. EMCORE provides its customers with limited rights of return for
non-conforming shipments and warranty claims for certain products. In accordance
with SFAS 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, EMCORE makes estimates of product warranty expense using
historical experience rates as a percentage of revenue and accrues estimated
warranty expense as a cost of revenue. We estimate the costs of our
warranty obligations based on our historical experience of known product failure
rates, use of materials to repair or replace defective products and service
delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures. In addition, from time
to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen technical problems
arise. Should our actual experience relative to these factors differ from our
estimates, we may be required to record additional warranty reserves.
Alternatively, if we provide more reserves than we need, we may reverse a
portion of such provisions in future periods.
Revenue Recognition.
Revenue is recognized upon shipment provided persuasive evidence of a contract
exists, (such as when a purchase order or contract is received from a customer),
the price is fixed, the product meets its specifications, title and ownership
have transferred to the customer, and there is reasonable assurance of
collection of the sales proceeds. In those few instances where a given sale
involves post shipment obligations, formal customer acceptance documents, or
subjective rights of return, revenue is not recognized until all post-shipment
conditions have been satisfied and there is reasonable assurance of collection
of the sales proceeds. The majority of our products have shipping terms that are
free on board (FOB) or free carrier alongside (FCA) shipping point, which means
that EMCORE fulfills its delivery obligation when the goods are handed over to
the freight carrier at our shipping dock. This means the buyer bears all costs
and risks of loss or damage to the goods from that point. In certain cases,
EMCORE ships its products cost insurance and freight (CIF). Under this
arrangement, revenue is recognized under FCA shipping point terms, but EMCORE
pays (and bills the customer) for the cost of shipping and insurance to the
customer's designated location. EMCORE accounts for shipping and related
transportation costs by recording the charges that are invoiced to customers as
revenue, with the corresponding cost recorded as cost of revenue. In those
instances where inventory is maintained at a consigned location, revenue is
recognized only when our customer pulls product for its use and title and
ownership have transferred to the customer. Revenue from time and material
contracts is recognized at the contractual rates as labor hours and direct
expenses are incurred. EMCORE also generates service revenue from
hardware repairs and calibrations that is recognized as revenue upon completion
of the service. Any cost of warranties and remaining obligations that
are inconsequential or perfunctory are accrued when the corresponding revenue is
recognized.
Distributors - EMCORE uses a
number of distributors around the world. In accordance with Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 104, Revenue
Recognition, EMCORE recognizes revenue upon shipment of product to these
distributors. Title and risk of loss pass to the distributors upon shipment, and
our distributors are contractually obligated to pay EMCORE on standard
commercial terms, just like our other direct customers. EMCORE does not sell to
its distributors on consignment and, except in the event of a product
discontinuance, does not give distributors a right of return.
Solar Panel Contracts -
EMCORE records revenues from certain solar panel contracts using the
percentage-of-completion method in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position
81-1 ("SOP 81-1"), Accounting
for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type
Contracts. Revenue is recognized in proportion to actual costs incurred
compared to total anticipated costs expected to be incurred for each contract.
If estimates of costs to complete long-term contracts indicate a loss, a
provision is made for the total loss anticipated. EMCORE has numerous contracts
that are in various stages of completion. Such contracts require estimates to
determine the appropriate cost and revenue recognition. EMCORE uses all
available information in determining dependable estimates of the extent of
progress towards completion, contract revenues, and contract costs. Estimates
are revised as additional information becomes available.
Government R&D Contracts
- - R&D contract revenue represents reimbursement by various U.S. Government
entities, or their contractors, to aid in the development of new technology. The
applicable contracts generally provide that EMCORE may elect to retain ownership
of inventions made in performing the work, subject to a non-exclusive license
retained by the U.S. Government to practice the inventions for governmental
purposes. The R&D contract funding may be based on a cost-plus, cost
reimbursement, or a firm fixed price arrangement. The amount of funding under
each R&D contract is determined based on cost estimates that include both
direct and indirect costs. Cost-plus funding is determined based on actual costs
plus a set margin. As we incur costs under cost reimbursement type contracts, we
record revenue. Contract costs include material, labor, special tooling and test
equipment, subcontracting costs, as well as an allocation of indirect costs. An
R&D contract is considered complete when all significant costs have been
incurred, milestones have been reached, and any reporting obligations to the
customer have been met. Government contract revenue is primarily
recognized as service revenue.
EMCORE
also has certain cost-sharing R&D arrangements. Under such
arrangements in which the actual costs of performance are divided between the
U.S. Government and EMCORE, no revenue is recorded and the Company’s R&D
expense is reduced for the amount of the cost-sharing receipts.
The U.S. Government may
terminate any of our government contracts at their convenience as well as for
default based on our failure to meet specified performance measurements. If any
of our government contracts were to be terminated for convenience, we generally
would be entitled to receive payment for work completed and allowable
termination or cancellation costs. If any of our government contracts were to be
terminated for default, generally the U.S. Government would pay only for the
work that has been accepted and can require us to pay the difference between the
original contract price and the cost to re-procure the contract items, net of
the work accepted from the original contract. The U.S. Government can also hold
us liable for damages resulting from the default.
Stock-Based
Compensation. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and
the straight-line attribution approach to determine the fair-value of
stock-based awards under SFAS 123(R), Share-Based
Payment (revised 2004). The Company elected to use the modified
prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS 123(R) and accordingly prior
periods were not restated to reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R). The modified
prospective transition method requires that stock-based compensation expense be
recorded for all new and unvested stock options and employee stock purchase plan
shares that are ultimately expected to vest as the requisite service is rendered
beginning on October 1, 2005, the first day of the Company’s fiscal year
2006. The option-pricing model requires the input of highly
subjective assumptions, including the option’s expected life and the price
volatility of the underlying stock. EMCORE’s expected term represents the period
that stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding and is determined based
on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the
contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations
of future employee behavior as influenced by changes to the terms of its
stock-based awards. The expected stock price volatility is based on EMCORE’s
historical stock prices. See Note 3, “Equity” of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.
The above
listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting
policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is
specifically dictated by U.S. GAAP. There also are areas in which
management's judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a
materially different result. For complete discussion of our accounting policies
and other required U.S. GAAP disclosures, we refer you to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.
Results of
Operations
The
following table sets forth the condensed consolidated statements of operations
data of EMCORE expressed as a percentage of total revenues for the three months
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
For
the three months ended December 31,
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||
Product
revenue
|
94.9
|
%
|
92.3
|
%
|
|||
Service
revenue
|
5.1
|
7.7
|
|||||
Total
revenue
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|||||
Cost
of product revenue
|
75.7
|
80.2
|
|||||
Cost
of service revenue
|
3.3
|
5.6
|
|||||
Cost
of revenue
|
79.0
|
85.8
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
21.0
|
14.2
|
|||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
34.6
|
32.5
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
15.3
|
17.1
|
|||||
Total
operating expenses
|
49.9
|
49.6
|
|||||
Operating
loss
|
(28.9
|
)
|
(35.4
|
)
|
|||
Other
expenses (income):
|
|||||||
Interest
(income) expense, net
|
1.6
|
(1.0
|
)
|
||||
Loss
on disposal of equipment
|
0.2
|
-
|
|||||
Total
other expenses (income)
|
1.8
|
(1.0
|
)
|
||||
Net
loss
|
(30.7
|
)%
|
(34.4
|
)%
|
Comparison of three months
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Consolidated
Revenue
For the three months ended
December 31, 2007, EMCORE’s consolidated revenue increased $8.3 million or 22%
to $46.9 million from $38.6 million, as reported in the prior year. For the
three months ended December 31, 2007, international sales increased $7.2 million
or 56%, when compared to the prior year. For the three months ended December 31,
2007, revenue from government contracts, which are primarily service contracts,
decreased $1.0 million or 32% to $2.1 million from $3.1 million, as reported in
the prior year. A comparison of revenue achieved at each of EMCORE’s reportable
segments follows:
Fiber
Optics.
Over the
past several years, communications networks have experienced dramatic growth in
data transmission traffic due to worldwide Internet access, e-mail, and
e-commerce. As Internet content expands to include full motion video on-demand,
HDTV, multi-channel high quality audio, online video conferencing, image
transfer, online multi-player gaming, and other broadband applications, the
delivery of such data will place a greater demand on available bandwidth and
require the support of higher capacity networks. The bulk of this traffic, which
continues to grow at a very high rate, is already routed through the optical
networking infrastructure used by local and long distance carriers, as well as
internet service providers. Optical fiber offers substantially greater bandwidth
capacity, is less error prone, and is easier to administer than older copper
wire technologies. As greater bandwidth capability is delivered closer to the
end user, increased demand for higher content, real-time, interactive visual and
audio content is expected. We believe that EMCORE is well positioned to benefit
from the continued deployment of these higher capacity fiber optic
networks. Customers for the Fiber Optics segment include: Avago
Technologies, Inc., Alcatel, Aurora Networks, BUPT-GUOAN Broadband, C-Cor
Electronics, Cisco Systems, Inc., Finisar, Hewlett-Packard Corporation, Intel
Corporation, Jabil, JDSU, Motorola, Network Appliance, Sycamore Networks, Inc.,
and Tellabs.
For the
three months ended December 31, 2007, EMCORE’s fiber optic revenues increased
$8.7 million or 34% to $34.0 million from $25.3 million, as reported in the
prior year. The increase in revenue was primarily related to sales of our CATV
products and FTTP components, as well as a recovery of 10G products that serve
the digital fiber optics sector, which increased 13% year-over-year and 16% from
the prior quarter. The communications industry in which we
participate continues to be dynamic. The driving factor is the competitive
environment that exists between cable operators, telephone companies, and
satellite and wireless service providers. Each are rapidly investing capital to
deploy a converging multi-service network capable of delivering “triple play
services”, i.e. digitalized video, voice and data content, bundled as a service
provided by a single communication provider. As a market leader in RF
transmission over fiber products for the CATV industry, EMCORE enables cable
companies to offer multiple forms of communications to meet the expanding demand
for high-speed Internet, on-demand and interactive video, and other new services
(such as HDTV and VOIP). Television is also undergoing a major transformation,
as the U.S. Government requires television stations to broadcast exclusively in
digital format, abandoning the analog format used for decades. Although the
transition date for digital transmissions is not expected for several years, the
build-out of these television networks has already begun. To support the
telephone companies plan to offer competing video, voice and data services
through the deployment of new fiber-based systems, EMCORE has developed and
maintains customer qualified FTTP components and subsystem products. Our CATV
and FTTP products include broadcast analog and digital fiber optic transmitters,
quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) transmitters, video receivers, and passive
optical network (PON) transceivers. Government contract revenue for fiber optics
products for the three months ended December 31, 2006 totaled $0.2 million.
There was no government contract revenue during the three months ended December
31, 2007. Fiber optics revenue represented 72% and 66% of EMCORE's
total revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Photovoltaics.
EMCORE
provides advanced compound semiconductor solar cell products and solar panels,
which are more resistant to radiation levels in space and convert substantially
more power from sunlight than silicon-based solutions. EMCORE’s
Photovoltaics segment designs and manufactures multi-junction compound
semiconductor solar cells for both commercial and military satellite
applications as well as for use in terrestrial concentrating photovoltaic solar
power systems. Customers for the Photovoltaics segment include Boeing, General
Dynamics, the Indian Space Research Organization (“ISRO”), Lockheed Martin,
Space Systems/Loral and Green and Gold Energy.
For the
three months ended December 31, 2007, EMCORE’s photovoltaic revenues decreased
$0.4 million or 3% to $12.9 million from $13.3 million, as reported in the prior
year. The decline in revenue resulted from delivery and installation delays on
capital equipment purchased for its new expanded concentrator photovolatics
(“CPV”) solar cell and receiver manufacturing line. All required
capital equipment is expected to be on line in the second fiscal quarter and
shipment of CPV receivers should commence shortly. Government
contract revenues for photovoltaics products were $2.1 million and $2.8 million
for the three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Photovoltaics revenue represented 28% and 34% of
EMCORE's total revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
We see
additional areas for growth resulting from the successful deployment of
terrestrial solar power systems that relay on our multi-junction solar cells and
CPV components. Concentrating PV systems have the potential to
provide cost effective solar power in regions of high solar resource and several
countries such as Italy, Spain and Greece have provided favorable feed in
tariffs for utility-scale solar power installations. EMCORE has
developed high efficiency multi-junction solar cells and integrated PV
components that function as the engine in concentrating photovoltaic systems and
we are well positioned to provide the enabling components in these large-scale
deployments. In the satellite industry, we see increased opportunity
in the commercial area as the number of geosynchronous communication satellite
launches have recovered from the decline observed earlier in the decade, with
Space Systems Loral winning a substantial share of the awards over the last
several years. Government and military procurement remains steady, and we have
succeeded in gaining market share in that area. We have recently been awarded
solar panel government contracts for military and science missions, and this
represents an expansion of our customer base.
Gross
Profit
For the
three months ended December 31, 2007, gross profit increased to $9.9 million
compared to $5.5 million, as reported in the prior year. Compared to the prior
year, gross margins increased to 21% from 14%. On a segment basis, margins for
Fiber Optics increased from 18% to 24% due to increased revenue and
restructuring efforts completed by the Company in the prior
year. Margins for the Photovoltaics segment improved from 8% as
reported in the prior year to 15% due to favorable product mix and improved
manufacturing yields.
Actions
designed to improve our gross margins (through product mix improvements, cost
reductions associated with product transfers and product rationalization,
maximizing production yields on high-performance devices and quality
improvements, among other things) continue to be a principal focus for
us. The establishment of a modern solar panel manufacturing facility,
adjacent to our solar cell fabrication operations, should facilitate
consistency, as well as reduce manufacturing costs. The benefit of having these
operations located at one site is expected to provide high quality, high
reliability and cost-effective solar components. We focus our activities on
developing new process control and yield management tools that enable us to
accelerate the adoption of new technologies into full-volume production, while
minimizing their associated risks.
For both
the three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, gross profit included the
effect of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of stock-based
compensation expense related to employee stock options and employee stock
purchases under SFAS 123(R).
Operating
Expenses
Selling, General and Administrative.
For the three months ended December 31, 2007, SG&A expenses increased
$3.7 million or 30% to $16.2 million from $12.5 million, as reported in the
prior year.
Consistent with prior years, SG&A expense includes corporate overhead
expenses. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A increased from 33% to
35%. A significant portion of the year-over-year increase in
operating expenses was due to non-cash stock-based compensation
expense. During the three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
SG&A included stock-based compensation expense of $4.9 million and $1.6
million, respectively. In 2007, the Company incurred
approximately $4.4 million in additional non-cash stock-based compensation
expense related to the modification of stock options issued to former employees,
which is described further in Note 3, “Equity” in the Notes to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Research and Development.
Our R&D efforts have been sharply focused to maintain our
technological leadership position by working to improve the quality and
attributes of our product lines. We also invest significant resources to develop
new products and production technology to expand into new market opportunities
by leveraging our existing technology base and infrastructure. Our efforts are
focused on designing new proprietary processes and products, on improving the
performance of our existing materials, components, and subsystems, and on
reducing costs in the product manufacturing process. In addition to using our
internal capacity to develop and manufacture products for our target markets,
EMCORE continues to expand its portfolio of products and technologies through
acquisitions.
For the
three months ended December 31, 2007, R&D expenses increased $0.6 million or
9% to $7.2 million from $6.6 million, as reported in the prior year. During the three months
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, R&D included stock-based compensation
expense of $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively. As a
percentage of revenue, R&D decreased from 17% to 15%. We believe
that recently completed R&D projects have the potential to greatly improve
our competitive position and drive revenue growth in the next few
years.
As part
of the ongoing effort to cut costs, many of our projects are to develop lower
cost versions of our existing products and of our existing processes, while
improving quality. Also, we have implemented a program to focus research and
product development efforts on projects that we expect to generate returns
within one year. Our technology and product leadership is an important
competitive advantage. Driven by current and anticipated demand, we will
continue to invest in new technologies and products that offer our customers
increased efficiency, higher performance, improved functionality, and/or higher
levels of integration.
Other
Income & Expenses
Interest
Income. EMCORE realized a significant decrease in interest
income due to the Company’s decreased cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities position.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Conclusion
We
believe that our current liquidity should be sufficient to meet our cash needs
for working capital through the next twelve months. If cash generated from
operations and cash on hand are not sufficient to satisfy EMCORE's liquidity
requirements, EMCORE will seek to obtain additional equity or debt
financing. On December 17, 2007, EMCORE entered into an asset
purchase agreement with Intel Corporation to purchase certain assets of Intel's
Optical Platform Division for a purchase price of $85 million. The
purchase price will be paid $75 million in cash and $10 million in cash or
EMCORE common stock, at EMCORE's option. EMCORE has plans to improve
its liquidity position through additional equity financing, as well as potential
asset sales. Additional funding may not be available when needed, or on terms
acceptable to EMCORE. If EMCORE is required to raise additional financing and if
adequate funds are not available or not available on acceptable terms, our
ability to continue to fund expansion, develop and enhance products and
services, or otherwise respond to competitive pressures may be severely limited.
Such a limitation could have a material adverse effect on EMCORE's business,
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
Credit
Market Conditions
The
Company plans to fund the asset purchase of Intel’s Optical Platform Division
through (i) debt financing, (ii) equity financing and/or (iii) asset
sales. Currently, the U.S. capital markets are experiencing turbulent
conditions in the credit markets, as evidenced by tightening of lending
standards, reduced availability of credit vehicles accompanied by a reduction in
certain asset values. This potentially impacts EMCORE’s ability to
obtain this additional funding through financing or asset
sales. Although management believes it will be able to obtain the
funding necessary to fund the acquisition, despite the reduced availability of
these credit vehicles, no assurance can be made that the Company will be able to
finance the acquisition on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Working
Capital
As of
December 31, 2007, EMCORE had working capital of approximately $54.2 million
compared to $63.2 million as of September 30, 2007. Cash, cash
equivalents, and marketable securities at December 31, 2007 totaled $29.8
million, which reflects a net decrease of $11.5 million from September 30,
2007. The decrease is primarily due to payment of professional fees
incurred with our review of historical stock option granting practices, legal
costs associated with our patent infringement lawsuits against Optium
Corporation, interest payments on our convertible subordinated notes, capital
expenditures, and various other increases in net working capital
requirements.
Cash
Flow
Net Cash Used For
Operations
For the
three months ended December 31, 2007, net cash used for operations decreased
$12.1 million to $11.0 million from $23.1 million, as reported in the prior
year. For the three months ended December 31, 2007, significant
changes in working capital include an increase in receivables of $3.2 million,
an increase in inventory of $0.4 million, an increase in accounts payable of
$1.6 million and a decrease in accrued expenses of $2.2 million. For the three
months ended December 31, 2006, changes in working capital include an increase
in receivables of $10.2 million, an increase in inventory of $0.5 million, a
decrease in accounts payable of $2.0 million and a decrease in accrued expenses
of $2.9 million.
Net Cash Provided by
Investing Activities
For the
three months ended December 31, 2007, net cash provided by investing activities
decreased by $7.8 million to $8.7 million from $16.5 million, as reported in the
prior year. Changes in investing cash flows for the three months ended December
31, 2007 and 2006 consisted primarily of:
|
·
|
An
increase in capital expenditures to $5.0 million from $1.2 million, as
reported in the prior year.
|
|
·
|
An
investment of $13.7 million, inclusive of $0.2 million in transaction
costs, in WorldWater during the quarter ended December 31,
2006.
|
|
·
|
Net
sales of $13.9 million in marketable securities compared to $30.7 million
for the same period in the prior
year.
|
Net Cash Provided by
Financing Activities
Cash
provided by financing activities was $4.8 million for the three months ended
December 31, 2007 compared to $0.4 million for the three months ended December
31, 2006. The increase in cash was due to proceeds from stock option
exercises.
Financing
Transaction
The
Company may redeem some or all of its convertible notes, at par value, if the
closing price of the Company's common stock exceeds $12.09 per share for at
least twenty trading days within a period of any thirty consecutive trading days
ending on the trading day prior to the date of mailing the notice of
redemption. The notice of redemption must be mailed to the holders of
the convertible notes at least 20 days but not more than 60 days before the
redemption date. Once the notice of redemption is mailed by the
Company to the holders of its convertible notes, the convertible notes become
irrevocably due and payable on the redemption date. Each of the
indentures governing the convertible notes requires the Company to deposit funds
sufficient to cover the redemption price of, plus accrued and unpaid interest
on, the convertible notes to be redeemed with the Trustee one business day prior
to the redemption date. The holders of the convertible notes can
convert the convertible notes into shares of the Company’s common stock at any
time before maturity, or with respect to convertible notes called for
redemption, until the close of business on the business day immediately
preceding the redemption date. The number of shares issuable upon
conversion is determined by dividing the principal amount to be converted by the
conversion price in effect on the conversion date. The conversion
price is $7.01, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments.
On
January 29, 2008, the Company, in privately negotiated transactions, entered
into separate agreements with holders of approximately 97.5%, or approximately
$83.3 million aggregate principal amount, of its outstanding 5.50% convertible
senior subordinated notes due 2011 pursuant to which this small number of
holders converted their Notes into the Company’s common stock. Upon
conversion of the Notes, the Company will issue 11.9 million shares of
its common stock, based on a conversion price of $7.01, in accordance with the
terms of the Notes. The issuance of the Company’s common stock upon
conversion of the Notes will be made in reliance on the exemption from the
registration requirements provided under Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities
Act of 1933. To incentivize the holders to convert their Notes, the
Company made cash payments to such holders equal to 4% of the principal amount
of the Notes converted, or $3.3 million, plus accrued interest of approximately
$1.0 million on the Notes converted. This supplemental payment will
be charged to expense in the second quarter of fiscal 2008, along with the
acceleration of deferred financing costs of approximately $0.7
million. After giving effect to these transactions, the Company
expects to have approximately 64 million shares of common stock
outstanding.
In
addition, on January 29, 2008, the Company called for redemption all of its
outstanding Notes. After giving effect to the conversions, the
Company expects that approximately $2.1 million aggregate principal amount of
Notes will remain outstanding and subject to redemption. The redemption date
will be February 20, 2008, and the redemption price, will be 100% of the
principal amount of the Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but
not including, the redemption date. Note holders who wish to convert
their
Notes must do so by the close of business on February 19, 2008.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
We are
exposed to financial market risks, including changes in currency exchange rates
and interest rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments for
speculative purposes.
Currency Exchange Rates.
Although EMCORE enters into transactions denominated in foreign currencies from
time to time, the total amount of such transactions is not material.
Accordingly, fluctuations in foreign currency values would not have a material
adverse effect on our future financial condition or results of operations.
However, some of our foreign suppliers may adjust their prices (in $US) from
time to time to reflect currency exchange fluctuations, and such price changes
could impact our future financial condition or results of
operations. The Company does not currently hedge its foreign currency
exposure.
Interest Rates. We maintain
an investment portfolio in a variety of high-grade (AAA), short-term debt and
money market instruments such as auction-rate securities, which carry a minimal
degree of interest rate risk. Due in part to these factors, our future
investment income may be slightly less than expected because of changes in
interest rates, or we may suffer insignificant losses in principal if forced to
sell securities that have experienced a decline in market value because of
changes in interest rates. The Company does not currently hedge its
interest rate exposure.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
The
Company intends to maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to
provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in
reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”) is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the specified time periods and
accumulated and communicated to management, including its Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer), as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Management,
under the supervision and with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer), evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)
promulgated under the Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on that evaluation, management concluded that, as of that date, the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable
assurance level.
Attached
as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are certifications of the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Interim
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), which are required in
accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Act. This Disclosure Controls and
Procedures section includes information concerning management’s evaluation of
disclosure controls and procedures referred to in those certifications and, as
such, should be read in conjunction with the certifications of the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Interim Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer).
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations
on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial
Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal controls
will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how
well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a
control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and
the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of
the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if
any, within EMCORE have been detected. These inherent limitations include the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns
can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be
circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any
system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with
associated policies or procedures. Because of the inherent
limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The
Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that are discussed
below. The Company is also subject to certain other legal proceedings and claims
that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and which have not been
fully adjudicated. The Company does not believe it has a potential
liability related to current legal proceedings and claims that could
individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on its financial
condition, liquidity or results of operations. However, the results of legal
proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Should the Company fail to
prevail in any legal matters or should several legal matters be resolved against
the Company in the same reporting period, the operating results of a particular
reporting period could be materially adversely affected.
SEC
Investigation
On
November 6, 2006, the Company informed the staff of the SEC of the Special
Committee’s investigation regarding the Company‘s historical review of stock
option granting practices. After the Company’s initial contact with
the SEC, the SEC opened a non-public investigation concerning the Company’s
historic option granting practices since the Company’s initial public
offering. The Company has fully cooperated with the SEC’s
investigation. Although we cannot predict the outcome of this matter,
we do not expect that such matter will have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Shareholder
Derivative Litigation Relating to Historical Stock Option Practices
On
February 1, 2007, Plaintiff Lewis Edelstein filed a purported stockholder
derivative action (the “Federal Court Action”) on behalf of the Company against
certain of its present and former directors and officers (the “Individual
Defendants”), as well as the Company as nominal defendant, in the U.S. District
Court for the District of New Jersey, Edelstein v. Brodie, et.
al., Case No. 3:07-cv-00596-FLW-JJH (D.N.J.). On May 22,
2007, Plaintiffs Kathryn Gabaldon and Michael Sackrison each filed a purported
stockholder derivative action against the Individual Defendants, and the Company
as nominal defendant, in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Somerset County,
Gabaldon v. Brodie,
et. al., Case No. 3:07-cv-03185-FLW-JJH (D.N.J.) and Sackrison v. Brodie, et.
al., Case No. 3:07-cv-00596-FLW-JJH (D.N.J.) (collectively, the “State
Court Actions”).
Both the
Federal Court Action and the State Court Actions alleged, using essentially
identical contentions that the Individual Defendants engaged in improprieties
and violations of law in connection with the Company’s historical issuances of
stock options. Each of the actions seeks the same relief on behalf of
the Company, including, among other things, damages, equitable relief, corporate
governance reforms, an accounting, rescission, restitution and costs and
disbursements of the lawsuit. On July 10, 2007, the State Court
Actions were removed to the U.S. District Court for the District of New
Jersey.
On
September 26, 2007, the plaintiff in the Federal Court Action signed an
agreement in principle with the Individual Defendants and the Company to settle
that litigation in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”)
filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006. That same day, the plaintiffs in the State Court
Actions advised the Federal Court that the settlement embodied in the MOU would
also constitute the settlement of the State Court Actions.
The MOU
provides that the Company will adhere to certain policies and procedures
relating to the issuance of stock options, stock trading by directors, officers
and employees, the composition of its Board of Directors, and the functioning of
the Board’s Audit and Compensation Committees. The MOU also provides
for the payment of $700,000 relating to plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees, costs and
expenses, which the Company’s insurance carrier has committed to pay on behalf
of the Company.
On
November 28, 2007, a Stipulation of Compromise and Settlement (the
“Stipulation”) substantially embodying the terms previously contained in the MOU
was fully executed by the Company and the other defendants and the plaintiffs in
the Federal Court Action and the State Court Actions. The Stipulation is filed
as Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September
30, 2007.
The
Stipulation provides that the Company will adhere to certain policies and
procedures relating to the issuance of stock options, stock trading by
directors, officers and employees, the composition of its Board of Directors,
and the functioning of the Board’s Audit and Compensation
Committees. The Stipulation also provides for the payment of $700,000
relating to plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses, which the Company’s
insurance carrier has committed to pay on behalf of the Company. A
motion to approve the settlement reflected in the Stipulation was filed with the
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on December 3,
2007. The Court granted the motion for preliminary approval of
the settlement on January 3, 2008. In the order of preliminary
approval, the Court required the Company to provide notice to shareholders by
February 14, 2008 and to set a date for a hearing for final approval of the
settlement for March 28, 2008. Upon such approval the settlement will
become final and binding on all parties and represent a final settlement of both
the Federal Court Action and the State Court Actions.
We have
recorded $700,000 as a liability for the stipulated settlement in fiscal year
2006 since events that led to the litigation existed as of that
date. Although we anticipate that our insurance carrier will cover
the stipulated settlement, we have not recorded any receivable, or gain
contingency, since the settlement is still contingent upon certain future
events.
Indemnification
Obligations
Subject
to certain limitations, we are obligated to indemnify our current and former
directors, officers and employees in connection with the Special Committee’s
investigation of our historical stock option practices, the related SEC
non-public investigation and shareholder litigation. These obligations arise
under the terms of our restated certificate of incorporation, our bylaws,
applicable contracts, and New Jersey law. The obligation to indemnify generally
means that we are required to pay or reimburse the individuals’ reasonable legal
expenses and possibly damages and other liabilities incurred in connection with
these matters. We are currently paying or reimbursing legal expenses being
incurred in connection with these matters by a number of our current and former
directors, officers and employees. The maximum potential amount of future
payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification
agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has a director and officer
liability insurance policies that limits its exposure and enables it to recover
a portion of any future amounts paid.
Intellectual
Property Lawsuits
We
protect our proprietary technology by applying for patents where appropriate and
in other cases by preserving the technology, related know-how and information as
trade secrets. The success and competitive position of our product lines is
significantly impacted by our ability to obtain intellectual property protection
for our R&D efforts.
We have,
from time to time, exchanged correspondence with third parties regarding the
assertion of patent or other intellectual property rights in connection with
certain of our products and processes. Additionally, on September 11, 2006, we
filed a lawsuit against Optium Corporation (Optium) in the U.S. District Court
for the Western District of Pennsylvania for patent infringement. In the suit,
EMCORE and JDS Uniphase Corporation (JDSU) allege that Optium is infringing on
U.S. patents 6,282,003 and 6,490,071 with its Prisma II 1550nm transmitters. On
March 14, 2007, following denial of a motion to add additional claims to its
existing lawsuit, EMCORE and JDSU filed a second patent suit in the same court
against Optium alleging infringement of JDSU's patent 6,519,374 ("the '374
patent"). On March 15, 2007, Optium filed a declaratory judgment
action against EMCORE and JDSU. Optium seeks in this litigation a declaration
that certain products of Optium do not infringe the '374 patent and that the
patent is invalid. The '374 patent is assigned to JDSU and licensed to
EMCORE.
On
December 20, 2007, the Company was served with a complaint in another
declaratory relief action which Optium had filed in the Federal District Court
for the Western District of Pennsylvania. This action seeks to have
U.S. patents 6,282,003 and 6,490,071 declared invalid or unenforceable because
of certain conduct alleged to have occurred in connection with the grant of
these patents. These allegations are substantially the same as those
brought by Optium by motion in the Company’s own case against Optium, which
motion had been denied by the Court. The Company intends to assert
that the allegations in the complaint are without merit and intends to contest
them.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
Credit
Market Conditions
The
Company plans to fund the asset purchase of Intel’s Optical Platform Division
through (i) debt financing, (ii) equity financing and/or (iii) asset
sales. Currently, the U.S. capital markets are experiencing turbulent
conditions in the credit markets, as evidenced by tightening of lending
standards, reduced availability of credit vehicles accompanied by a reduction in
certain asset values. This potentially impacts EMCORE’s ability to
obtain this additional funding through financing or asset
sales. Although management believes it will be able to obtain the
funding necessary to fund the acquisition, despite the reduced availability of
these credit vehicles, no assurance can be made that the Company will be able to
finance the acquisition on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Please
see “Item 1A - Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2007 for additional risk factors.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
Not
Applicable
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not
Applicable
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS
|
(a)
|
The
Registrant held its 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on December 3,
2007.
|
|
(b)
|
Charles
Scott and Hong Q. Hou were elected to the EMCORE Board of Directors for
three-year terms expiring in 2010. Thomas J. Russell, Reuben F.
Richards, Jr. and Robert Bogomolny will continue to serve on EMCORE’s
Board of Directors until the election in 2008. Thomas G.
Werthan and John Gillen will continue to serve on EMCORE’s Board of
Directors until the election in
2009.
|
|
(c)
|
(i)
|
The
total shares voted in the election of Directors were
41,315,195. There were no broker non-votes. The
shares voted for each Nominee were:
|
Charles
Scott
|
For 35,527,497
|
Withheld 5,787,698
|
Hong
Q. Hou
|
For 40,816,511
|
Withheld 498,684
|
|
|
(ii)
|
The
Shareholders ratified the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as
the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, as
follows:
|
For
|
41,153,394
|
Against
|
130,480
|
Abstain
|
31,321
|
|
|
(iii)
|
The
Shareholders approved the Company’s 2007 Director’s Stock Award Plan, as
follows:
|
For
|
30,251,209
|
Against
|
354,979
|
Abstain
|
98,864
|
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not
Applicable
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
2.1*
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated December 17, 2007, between EMCORE Corporation
and Intel Corporation
|
10.1*
|
2007
Director’s Stock Award Plan
|
31.1*
|
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2*
|
Certification
by Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1*
|
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.2*
|
Certification
by Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
__________
* Filed
herewith
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
EMCORE
CORPORATION
|
||
Date: February
11, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/ Reuben F.
Richards, Jr.
|
Reuben
F. Richards, Jr.
|
||
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
Date: February
11, 2008
|
By: |
/s/ Adam
Gushard
|
Adam
Gushard
|
||
Interim
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated December 17, 2007, between EMCORE Corporation
and Intel Corporation
|
|
2007
Director’s Stock Award Plan
|
|
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Certification
by Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
Certification
by Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
__________
* Filed herewith
39