10-K/A: Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)
Published on January 13, 2000
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to _______
Commission File Number: 0-22175
EMCORE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEW JERSEY 22-2746503
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
394 ELIZABETH AVENUE, SOMERSET, NJ 08873
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (732) 271-9090
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: COMMON STOCK,
NO PAR VALUE
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best
of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of December 1, 1999 was approximately $205,186,625 (based on the
closing sale price of $23 15/16 per share).
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's no par value common stock
as of December 1, 1999 was 13,565,769.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for the 2000 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on or before January 28, 2000) are incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K/A.
-1-
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT IDENTIFYING IMPORTANT FACTORS
THAT COULD CAUSE EMCORE'S ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER
FROM THOSE PROJECTED IN FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS:
In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, you are advised that this report contains both
statements of historical facts and forward looking statements.
This report includes forward-looking statements that reflect current
expectations or beliefs of EMCORE Corporation concerning future results and
events. The words "expects," "intends," "believes," "anticipates," "likely,"
"will", and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those
anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a
difference include, but are not limited to, delays in developing and
commercializing new products; cancellations, rescheduling or delays in product
shipments; delays in obtaining export licenses for product shipments; the
uncertainty of additional funding; continued acceptance of our MOCVD
technologies; operations and performance of our joint ventures; our ability to
achieve and implement the planned enhancements of products and services on a
timely and cost effective basis and customer acceptance of those product
introductions; product obsolescence due to advances in technology and shifts in
market demand; competition and resulting price pressures; labor actions against
EMCORE's customers or vendors; difficulties in obtaining licenses on
commercially reasonable terms necessary to manufacture and sell certain of our
products; economic and stock market conditions, particularly in the U.S., Europe
and Asia, and their impact on sales of our products and services; and such other
risk factors as may have been or may be included from time to time in EMCORE's
reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
-2-
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
COMPANY OVERVIEW
EMCORE Corporation designs, develops and manufactures compound
semiconductor materials and is a leading developer and manufacturer of the tools
and manufacturing processes used to fabricate compound semiconductor wafers and
devices. EMCORE's products and technology enable its customers, both in the
United States and internationally, to manufacture commercial volumes of
high-performance electronic devices using compound semiconductors. EMCORE has
recently established a number of strategic relationships through joint ventures,
long-term supply agreements and an acquisition in order to facilitate the
development and manufacture of new products in targeted growth markets. EMCORE's
products are used for a wide variety of applications in the communications
(satellite, data, telecommunications and wireless), consumer and automotive
electronics, computers and peripherals and lighting markets. Our customers
include Agilent Technologies Ltd., AMP, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., General
Motors Corp., Hughes-Spectrolab, Lucent Technologies, Inc., Motorola, Inc.,
Siemens AG's Osram GmbH subsidiary and 12 of the largest electronics
manufacturers in Japan.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
Recent advances in information technologies have created a growing need
for efficient, high-performance electronic systems that operate at very high
frequencies, have increased storage capacity and computational and display
capabilities, and can be produced cost-effectively in commercial volumes. In the
past, electronic systems manufacturers have relied on advances in silicon
semiconductor technology to meet many of these demands. However, the newest
generation of high-performance electronic and optoelectronic applications
require certain functions that are generally not achievable using silicon-based
components.
Compound semiconductors have emerged as an enabling technology to meet
the complex requirements of today's advanced information systems. Many compound
semiconductor materials have unique physical properties that allow electrons to
move at least four times faster than through silicon-based devices. Advantages
of compound semiconductor devices over silicon devices include:
o operation at higher speeds;
o lower power consumption;
o less noise and distortion; and
o optoelectronic properties that enable these devices to emit and
detect light.
Compound semiconductor devices can be used to perform individual
functions as discrete devices, such as solar cells, HB LEDs, VCSELs, MR sensors
and RF materials. Compound semiconductor devices can also be combined into
integrated circuits, such as transmitters, receivers and alphanumeric displays.
Although compound semiconductors are more expensive to manufacture than
silicon-based devices, electronics manufacturers are increasingly integrating
compound semiconductor devices into their products in order to achieve higher
performance in applications targeted for a wide variety of markets. These
include satellite communications, data communications, telecommunications,
wireless communications, consumer and automotive electronics, computers and
peripherals, and lighting.
The following factors have resulted in an increased demand for compound
semiconductor products and systems that enable electronic systems manufacturers
to reach the market faster with large volumes of high-performance products and
applications:
o rapid build-out of satellite communications systems;
o widespread deployment of fiber optic networks and the increasing use
of optical systems within these networks;
o launch of new wireless services and wireless high speed data systems;
o increasing use of infrared emitters and optical detectors in computer
systems;
o emergence of advanced consumer electronics applications, such as DVDs
and flat panel displays;
o increasing use of high-performance electronic devices in automobiles;
and
o the anticipated conversion to HB LEDs from incandescent, halogen and
compact fluorescent lighting.
-3-
The following chart summarizes the principal markets, examples of
applications for compound semiconductor devices, products incorporating these
devices and certain benefits and characteristics of these devices.
COMPOUND SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESS TECHNOLOGY
Compound semiconductors are composed of two or more elements and usually
consist of a metal such as gallium, aluminum or indium and a non-metal such as
arsenic, phosphorous or nitrogen. The resulting compounds include gallium
arsenide, indium phosphide, gallium nitride, indium antimonide and indium
aluminum phosphide. The performance characteristics of compound semiconductors
are dependent on the composition of these compounds. Many of the unique
properties of compound semiconductor devices are achieved by the layering of
different compound semiconductor materials in the same device. This layered
structure creates an optimal configuration to permit the emission or detection
of light and the detection of magnetic fields.
-4-
Accordingly, the composition and properties of each layer and the
control of the layering process, or epitaxy, are fundamental to the performance
of advanced electronic and optoelectronic compound semiconductor devices. The
variation of thickness and composition of layers determines the intensity and
color of the light emitted or detected and the efficiency of power conversion.
The ability to vary the intensity, color and efficiency of light generation and
detection enables compound semiconductor devices to be used in a broad range of
advanced information systems.
Compound semiconductor device manufacturers predominantly use four
methods to deposit compound materials: molecular beam epitaxy, vapor phase
epitaxy, liquid phase epitaxy and metal organic chemical vapor deposition
("MOCVD"). The use of molecular beam epitaxy technology can yield wafers having
high thickness uniformity. Compound semiconductor materials fabricated using
liquid phase epitaxy or vapor phase epitaxy technologies often have high
electronic and optical properties. However, due to the nature of the underlying
processes, these methods are not easily scaled up to high volume production,
which is necessary for the commercial viability of compound semiconductor
devices. All of the methods used to manufacture compound semiconductor devices
pose technical, training and safety challenges that are not present in the
manufacture of silicon devices. These production systems typically require
expensive reactant materials, the use of certain toxic chemicals, and tight
control over numerous manufacturing parameters. The key differences between
MOCVD and the three other methods are that compound semiconductor wafers
fabricated using MOCVD generally possess a better combination of uniformity and
optical and electronic properties and are easier to produce in high volumes than
wafers manufactured by the three more traditional methods. Currently, MOCVD
technology is being used to manufacture a broad range of compound semiconductor
devices.
Historically, manufacturers who use compound semiconductor devices in
their products have met research, pilot production and capacity needs with
in-house systems and technologies. However, as the need for the production of
commercial volumes of high-performance compound semiconductor devices and the
variety of these devices grows, manufacturers are often unable to meet these
requirements using in-house solutions. In response to these growing demands for
higher volumes of a broad range of higher performance devices, manufacturers are
increasingly turning to outside vendors to meet their needs for compound
semiconductor wafers and devices.
THE EMCORE SOLUTION
EMCORE provides its customers with a broad range of compound
semiconductor products and services intended to meet their diverse technology
requirements. EMCORE has developed extensive materials science expertise,
process technology and MOCVD production systems to address our customers' needs
and believes that its proprietary TurboDisc(TM) deposition technology makes
possible one of the most cost-effective production processes for the commercial
volume manufacture of high-performance compound semiconductor wafers and
devices. This platform technology provides the basis for the production of
various types of compound semiconductor wafers and devices and enables EMCORE to
address the critical need of manufacturers to cost-effectively get to market
faster with high volumes of new and improved high-performance products. EMCORE's
compound semiconductor products and services include:
o materials and process development;
o design and development of devices;
o MOCVD production systems; and
o manufacture of wafers and devices in high volumes.
Customers can take advantage of EMCORE's vertically integrated approach
by purchasing custom-designed wafers and devices from EMCORE or they can
manufacture their own devices in-house using a TurboDisc(TM) production system
configured to their specific needs.
-5-
STRATEGY
EMCORE's objective is to capitalize on its position in MOCVD process
technology and production systems to become the leading supplier of compound
semiconductor wafers, devices and production systems. The key elements of
EMCORE's strategy include:
APPLY CORE TECHNOLOGY ACROSS MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS. EMCORE continually
leverages its proprietary core technology to develop compound semiconductor
products for multiple applications in a variety of markets. These activities
include developing new products for targeted applications as well as expanding
existing products into new applications. For example, EMCORE's MR sensors,
currently used by General Motors Corporation as crank shaft sensors, also have
other potential product applications, including as sensors in brushless motors
and antilock brakes. Other existing products, which EMCORE intends to introduce
in new applications, include VCSELs for communications products and HB LEDs for
broader lighting applications.
TARGET HIGH GROWTH MARKET OPPORTUNITIES. EMCORE's strategy is to target
high growth market opportunities where performance characteristics and high
volume production efficiencies can give compound semiconductors a competitive
advantage over other devices. Historically, while technologically superior,
compound semiconductors have not been widely deployed because they are more
expensive to manufacture than silicon-based semiconductors and other existing
solutions. EMCORE believes that as compound semiconductor production costs are
reduced, new customers will be compelled to use these solutions because of their
higher performance characteristics. For example, EMCORE has reduced the average
cost of compound semiconductor solar cells to the point that customers are
replacing silicon-based solar cells because of the compound semiconductor solar
cells' higher overall efficiency and lower weight.
PARTNER WITH KEY INDUSTRY PARTICIPANTS. EMCORE seeks to identify and
develop long-term relationships with leading companies in targeted industries.
EMCORE develops these relationships in a number of ways that include long-term
high-volume supply agreements, joint ventures, an acquisition, and distribution
and other arrangements. For example, EMCORE entered into a joint venture with
General Electric Lighting for the development and marketing of white light and
colored HB LED products for automotive, traffic, flat panel display and other
lighting applications. EMCORE has also entered into a long-term supply agreement
with AMP Incorporated for VCSELs to be used in its transceivers for Gigabit
Ethernet and other applications. EMCORE intends to actively seek similar
strategic relationships with other key customers and industry participants in
order to further expand its technological and production base.
CONTINUE INVESTMENT TO MAINTAIN TECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP. Through
substantial investment in research and development, EMCORE seeks to expand its
leadership position in compound semiconductor production systems, wafers and
devices. EMCORE works with its customers to identify specific performance
criteria and uses this information to enhance the performance of its production
systems and to further expand its process and materials science expertise,
including the development of new low cost, high-volume wafers and devices for
its customers. In addition, EMCORE's development efforts are focused on
continually lowering the production costs of its solutions.
PRODUCTS
PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
EMCORE is a leading supplier of MOCVD compound semiconductor production
systems, with more than 250 systems shipped as of September 30, 1999. EMCORE
believes that its TurboDisc(TM) systems offer significant ownership advantages
over competing systems and that the high throughput capabilities of its
TurboDisc(TM) systems make possible superior reproducibility of thickness,
composition, electronic properties and layer accuracy required for electronic
and optoelectronic devices. Each system can be customized for the customer's
throughput, wafer size and process chemistry requirements. EMCORE's production
systems also achieve a high degree of reliability with an average time available
for production, based on customer data, of approximately 95%.
-6-
EMCORE believes its TurboDisc(TM) systems enable the lowest cost of
ownership for the manufacture of compound semiconductor materials. The major
components of the cost of ownership include yield, throughput, direct costs and
capital costs. Yield primarily relates to material uniformity, which is a
function of the precision of the physical and chemical processes by which atomic
layers are deposited. Throughput, the volume of wafers produced per unit of
time, includes both the time required for a process cycle and the handling time
between process steps. Direct costs include consumables used in manufacturing
and processing and the clean room space required for the equipment. Capital
costs include the cost of acquisition and installation of the process equipment.
EMCORE's proprietary TurboDisc(TM) technology utilizes a unique high
speed rotating disk in a stainless steel growth chamber with integrated
vacuum-compatible loading chambers. To produce a wafer, a bare substrate, such
as gallium arsenide, sapphire or germanium, is placed on a wafer carrier in the
TurboDisc(TM) growth chamber and subjected to high temperatures. Based on a
predetermined formula, metal organic gases are released into the growth chamber.
These gases decompose on the hot, rapidly spinning wafer. Semiconductor
materials are then deposited on the substrate in a highly uniform manner. The
resulting wafer thus carries one or more ultra-thin layers of compound
semiconductor material such as gallium arsenide, gallium nitride, or indium
aluminum phosphide. The TurboDisc(TM) technology not only produces uniformity of
deposition across the wafer, but also offers flexibility for diverse
applications with improved material results and increased production rates. The
unique precision control of reactant gas flow in the TurboDisc(TM) technology
platform allows users to scale easily from research to commercial volumes with
substantially reduced time and effort. Upon removal from the growth chamber, the
wafer is transferred to a device processing facility for various steps such as
photolithography, etching, masking, metallization and dicing. Upon completion of
these steps, the devices are then sent for packaging by the customer or other
third parties and inclusion in the customer's product.
EMCORE offers the following family of TurboDisc(TM) systems:
EMCORE's next generation of TurboDisc(TM) products is being designed to
provide a number of innovations including:
o new reactor design to improve efficiency;
o cassette-to-cassette wafer handling to increase automation;
o digital control system to reduce noise;
o real-time process control and data acquisition on WindowsNT platform;
o modular component design to ease outsourcing and upgrading; and
o improved temperature control.
-7-
WAFERS AND DEVICES
Since its inception, EMCORE has worked closely with its customers to
design and develop materials processes for use in production systems for its
customers' end-use applications. EMCORE has leveraged its process and materials
science knowledge base to manufacture a broad range of compound semiconductor
wafers and devices such as solar cells, HB LEDs, VCSELs, MR sensors and RF
materials.
Within most of these product lines, EMCORE has established strategic
relationships through joint ventures, long-term supply agreements and an
acquisition. A summary of these relationships is found below:
-8-
SOLAR CELLS.
Compound semiconductor solar cells are used to power satellites because
they are more resistant to radiation levels in space, convert substantially more
light to power and therefore weigh less per unit of power than silicon-based
solar cells. These characteristics increase satellite life, increase payload
capacity and reduce launch costs. EMCORE is currently involved in five solar
cell projects:
o In November 1999, EMCORE entered into a Technical Assistance
Agreement with Loral and Mitsubishi Electric Corporation.
o In November 1998, EMCORE signed a four-year purchase agreement with
Space Systems/Loral, a wholly owned subsidiary of Loral Space &
Communications. Under this agreement, EMCORE will supply compound
semiconductor high efficiency gallium arsenide solar cells for
Loral's satellites. EMCORE received purchase orders from Space
Systems/Loral that total $7.2 million and will service this agreement
through our newly completed facility in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
EMCORE plans to start shipping solar cells as early as December 1999
and a majority of the solar cell shipments are scheduled for the
second fiscal quarter, which ends March 31, 2000.
o In November 1998, EMCORE received a $2.2 million contract under the
U.S. Air Force's Broad Agency Announcement Program for the
development of high-efficiency advanced solar cells.
o In September 1998, EMCORE entered into an agreement with Lockheed
Martin Missiles and Space, a strategic business unit of Lockheed
Martin Corporation, to provide technical management and support of a
Cooperative Research and Development Agreement between Lockheed
Martin and Sandia National Laboratory for the advancement and
commercialization of a new compound semiconductor high efficiency
solar cell. Pursuant to this strategic agreement, (1) Lockheed Martin
will grant EMCORE a sub-license for all related intellectual property
developed on behalf of or in conjunction with Lockheed Martin, and
(2) EMCORE and Lockheed Martin will jointly qualify and validate the
high efficiency solar cells for operational satellite use.
o In August 1998, EMCORE and Union Miniere Inc., a mining and materials
company, entered into a long-term supply agreement for germanium,
which EMCORE uses to fabricate solar cells. In addition to their
solar cell relationship, in November 1998, EMCORE formed UMCore, a
joint venture with Union Miniere to explore and develop alternate
uses for germanium using EMCORE's material science and production
platform expertise and Union Miniere's access to and experience with
germanium. UMCore commenced research and development operations in
January 1999.
HB LEDS.
High-brightness light-emitting diodes ("HB LEDs") are solid state
compound semiconductor devices that emit light. The global demand for HB LEDs
is experiencing rapid growth because LEDs have a long useful life of
approximately 10 years, consume approximately 10% of the power consumed by
incandescent or halogen lighting and improve display visibility. In February
1998, EMCORE and Uniroyal Technology Corporation formed Uniroyal
Optoelectronics, a joint venture to manufacture, sell and distribute HB LED
wafers and package-ready devices.
In May 1999, EMCORE and General Electric Lighting formed GELcore, a
joint venture to develop and market HB LED lighting products. General Electric
Lighting and EMCORE have agreed that this joint venture will be the exclusive
vehicle for each party's participation in solid state lighting. GELcore seeks to
combine EMCORE's materials science expertise, process technology and compound
semiconductor production systems with General Electric Lighting's brand name
recognition and extensive marketing and distribution capabilities. GELcore's
long-term goal is to develop products to replace traditional lighting.
-9-
VCSELS.
Vertical cavity surface-emitting lasers ("VCSELs") are semiconductor
lasers that emit light in a cylindrical beam. Leading electronic systems
manufacturers are integrating VCSELs into a broad array of end-market
applications including Internet access, digital cross-connect telecommunications
switches, DVD, and fiber optic switching and routing, such as Gigabit Ethernet.
VCSELs offer significant advantages over traditional laser diodes, including:
o greater control over beam size and wavelength;
o reduced manufacturing complexity and packaging costs;
o lower power consumption; and
o higher frequency performance.
In December 1997, EMCORE acquired MicroOptical Devices, Inc. ("MODE"), a
development stage company, primarily dedicated to the research and development
of enabling VCSEL technologies. In February 1998, EMCORE announced Gigalase, its
first commercial high speed VCSEL laser. In September 1998, EMCORE signed a
four-year purchase agreement with AMP Inc. to provide VCSELs for a family of
optical transceivers for the Gigabit Ethernet, FibreChannel and ATM markets. In
December 1998, EMCORE announced its second VCSEL product, Gigarray, a VCSEL
array.
MR SENSORS.
Magneto resistive ("MR") sensors are compound semiconductor devices that
possess sensing capabilities. MR sensors improve vehicle performance through
more accurate control of engine and crank shaft timing, which allows for
improved spark plug efficiency and reduced emissions. In January 1997, EMCORE
initiated shipments of compound semiconductor MR sensors using technology
licensed to EMCORE from General Motors. This license allows EMCORE to
manufacture and sell products using this technology to anyone. As of September
30, 1999 EMCORE has delivered over eight million devices to General Motors
Powertrain for crank and cam speed and position sensing applications for 5
different engine builds under 20 different vehicle platforms.
In October 1998, EMCORE formed Emtech, a joint venture with Optek
Technology, Inc., a packager and distributor of optoelectronic devices, to
market an expanded line of MR sensors to the automotive and related industries.
This joint venture seeks to combine EMCORE's strength in producing devices with
Optek's strength in packaging and distributing devices to offer off-the-shelf
products and expand market penetration. As of September 30, 1999, the joint
venture had not commenced operations.
RF MATERIALS.
Radio frequency ("RF") materials are compound semiconductor materials
that transmit and receive communications. Compound semiconductor RF materials
have a broader bandwidth and superior performance at high frequencies than
silicon-based materials. EMCORE currently produces RF materials for use as power
amplifiers in cellular phone handsets. In addition, EMCORE is exploring
opportunities to market these materials for additional uses in fiber optics and
satellite communications. EMCORE believes that its ability to produce high
volumes of RF materials at a low cost will facilitate their adoption in new
applications and new products.
In May 1999, EMCORE signed a long-term agreement with Sumitomo Electric
Industries, Ltd. (Hyogo, Japan) to jointly develop and produce Indium Gallium
Phosphide (InGaP) epitaxial wafers for use as Heterojunction Bipolar Transistor
(HBT) devices used in digital wireless and cellular applications. Sumitomo
Electric is one of the world's leading electronics manufacturers. These advanced
compound semiconductor HBT wafers will be produced at EMCORE's Epitaxial
Materials (E2M) wafer foundry in Somerset, New Jersey, and shipments of
commercial product are expected to begin in February 2000.
-10-
CUSTOMERS
EMCORE's customers include many of the largest semiconductor,
telecommunications, consumer goods and computer manufacturing companies in the
world. A number of EMCORE's customers are listed below. In addition, EMCORE has
sold its products to 12 of the largest electronics manufacturers in Japan.
AMP Incorporated LG Semiconductor Rockwell International
The Boeing Company L.M. Ericsson AB Samsung
General Motors Lucent Technologies Sharp U.S.A.
Hewlett Packard Motorola Siemens AG - Osram
Honeywell Northrop Grumman Texas Instruments
Hughes-Spectrolab Philips AG Thomson CSF
Hyundai Electronics Polaroid Westinghouse Electric
IBM
EMCORE has a comprehensive total quality management program with special
emphasis on total customer satisfaction. EMCORE seeks to encourage active
customer involvement with the design and operation of its production systems. To
accomplish this, EMCORE conducts user group meetings among its customers in
Asia, Europe and North America. At annual meetings, EMCORE's customers provide
valuable feedback on key operations, process oriented services, problems and
recommendations to improve EMCORE products. This direct customer feedback has
enabled EMCORE to constantly update and improve the design of its systems and
processes. Changes that affect the reliability and capabilities of EMCORE's
systems are embodied in new designs to enable current and future customers to
utilize systems which EMCORE believes are high quality and cost-efficient. As of
September 30, 1999, EMCORE employed 18 field service engineers who install
EMCORE systems and provide on-site support.
MARKETING AND SALES
EMCORE markets and sells its wafers, devices and systems through its
direct sales force in Europe, North America and Taiwan and through
representatives and distributors elsewhere in Asia. To market and service its
products in China, Japan and Singapore, EMCORE relies on a single marketing,
distribution and service provider, Hakuto Co., Ltd. EMCORE's agreements with
Hakuto have a term of 10 years, expiring March 2008. Hakuto has exclusive
distribution rights for certain EMCORE products in Japan. Hakuto has marketed
and serviced EMCORE's products since 1988, is a minority shareholder in EMCORE,
and the President of Hakuto is a member of EMCORE's Board of Directors. EMCORE
recently opened sales offices in Taiwan and California in order to be closer to
its customers. As of September 30, 1999, EMCORE employed 27 persons in sales and
marketing.
EMCORE's sales and marketing, senior management and technical staff work
closely with existing and potential customers to provide compound semiconductor
solutions for its customers' needs. The sales process begins by understanding
the customer's requirements and then attempting to match these requirements with
the optimal solution. EMCORE seeks to match the customer's requirements to an
existing design or a modification of a standard design, such as a change in
platform or process design. When necessary, EMCORE will work with the customer
to develop the appropriate design process and to configure and manufacture the
production system to meet the customer's needs. Also, EMCORE will produce
samples to demonstrate conformance to the customer's specifications. For
production systems, the amount of time from the initial contact with the
customer to the customer's placement of an order is typically two to nine months
or longer. EMCORE's sales cycle for wafers and devices usually runs three to
nine months, during which time EMCORE develops the formula of materials
necessary to meet the customer's specifications and qualifies the materials,
which may also require the delivery of samples. EMCORE believes that the high
level of marketing, management and engineering support involved in this process
is beneficial in developing competitive differentiation and long-term
relationships with its customers.
-11-
SERVICE AND SUPPORT
EMCORE maintains a worldwide service and support network responsible for
on-site maintenance and process monitoring on either a contractual or
time-and-materials basis. Customers may purchase annual service contracts under
which EMCORE is required to maintain an inventory of replacement parts and to
service the equipment upon the request of the customer. EMCORE also sells
replacement parts from inventory for customer needs. EMCORE pursues a program of
system upgrades for customers to increase the performance of older systems.
EMCORE generally does not offer extended payment terms to its customers and
generally adheres to a warranty policy of one year. Consistent with industry
practice, EMCORE maintains an inventory of components for servicing systems in
the field and it believes that its inventory is sufficient to satisfy
foreseeable short-term customer requirements. In fiscal year 1998, EMCORE opened
a warehouse depot in Taiwan to provide improved service to its Asian customers.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
To maintain and improve its competitive position, EMCORE's research and
development efforts are focused on designing new proprietary processes and
products, improving the performance of existing systems, wafers and devices and
reducing costs in the product manufacturing process. EMCORE has dedicated 21
TurboDisc(TM) systems for both research and production that are capable of
processing virtually all compound semiconductor materials. The research and
development staff utilizes x-ray, optical and electrical characterization
equipment, which provide instant data allowing for shortened development cycles
and rapid customer response. EMCORE's recurring research and development
expenses were approximately $20.7 million in fiscal year 1999, $16.5 million in
fiscal year 1998 and $9.0 million in fiscal year 1997. EMCORE also incurred a
one-time, non-cash acquired in-process research and development expense in
fiscal year 1998 in the amount of $19.5 million in connection with the
acquisition of MODE. EMCORE expects that it will continue to expend substantial
resources on research and development. As of September 30, 1999, EMCORE employed
77 persons in research and development, 33 of whom held Ph.D.s in materials
science or related fields.
EMCORE also competes for research and development funds. In view of the
high cost of development, EMCORE solicits research contracts that provide
opportunities to enhance its core technology base or promote the
commercialization of targeted products. EMCORE presently has ten contracts under
the Small Business Innovative Research programs or similar government sponsored
programs. From inception until September 30, 1999, government and other external
research contracts have provided approximately $15.3 million to support EMCORE's
research and development efforts. EMCORE is also positioned to market technology
and process development expertise directly to customers who require it for their
own product development efforts.
-12-
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND LICENSING
EMCORE's success and competitive position both for production systems
and wafers and devices depend significantly on its ability to maintain trade
secrets and other intellectual property protections. Our strategy is to rely
more on trade secrets than patents. A "trade secret" is information that has
value to the extent it is not generally known, not readily ascertainable by
others through legitimate means, and protected in a way that maintains its
secrecy. Reliance on trade secrets is only an effective business practice
insofar as trade secrets remain undisclosed and a proprietary product or process
is not reverse engineered or independently developed. In order to protect its
trade secrets, EMCORE takes certain measures to ensure their secrecy, such as
executing non-disclosure agreements with its employees, joint venture partners,
customers and suppliers.
To date, EMCORE has been issued 11 U.S. patents and others are either
pending or under review. These U.S. patents will expire between 2005 and 2013.
None of these U.S. patents claim any material aspect of the current or planned
commercial versions of EMCORE's systems, wafers or devices. EMCORE relies on
trade secrets rather than patents to protect its intellectual property because
it believes publishing patents would make it easier for others to reverse
engineer EMCORE's proprietary processes. EMCORE is a licensee of certain VCSEL
technology and associated patent rights owned by Sandia Corporation. The Sandia
license grants EMCORE:
o exclusive rights (subject to certain rights granted to Department of
Energy and AT&T Corporation) to develop, manufacture and sell
products containing Sandia VCSEL technologies for barcode scanning
and plastic optical fiber communications applications under five U.S.
patents that expire between 2007 and 2015;
o nonexclusive rights with respect to all other applications of these
patents; and
o nonexclusive rights to employ a proprietary oxidation fabrication
method in the manufacture of VCSEL products under a sixth U.S. patent
that expires in 2014. Our exclusivity with respect to the barcode
scanning and plastic optical fiber communications applications
expires in 2003 or such earlier time as we fail to meet certain
development and marketing criteria. EMCORE's success and competitive
position as a producer of VCSEL products depends on the continuation
of its rights under the Sandia license, the scope and duration of
those rights and the ability of Sandia to protect its proprietary
interests in the underlying technology and patents.
In 1992, we received a royalty bearing, non-exclusive license under a
patent held by Rockwell International Corporation which relates to an aspect of
the manufacturing process used by our TurboDisc(TM) systems. In October 1996, we
initiated discussions with Rockwell to receive additional licenses to permit us
to use this technology to manufacture and sell compound semiconductor wafers and
devices. In November 1996, we suspended these negotiations because of litigation
surrounding the validity of the Rockwell patent. We also ceased making royalty
payments to Rockwell under the license during the pendency of the litigation. In
January 1999, the case was settled and a judgment was entered in favor of
Rockwell. As a result, we may be required to pay royalties to Rockwell for
certain of our past sales of wafers and devices to our customers who did not
hold licenses directly from Rockwell. Management has reviewed and reassessed the
royalty agreements and concluded that it has the appropriate amounts reserved
for at both September 30, 1998 and 1999.
Additionally, until the patent expires in January 2000, we may require
additional licenses from Rockwell under the Rockwell patent in order to continue
to manufacture and sell wafers and devices. We are currently negotiating with
Rockwell to obtain the necessary licenses. The failure to obtain or maintain
licenses to manufacture these wafers and devices on commercially reasonable
terms may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS
EMCORE is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations
concerning the use, storage, handling, generation, treatment, emission, release,
discharge and disposal of certain materials used in its research and development
and production operations, as well as laws and regulations concerning
environmental remediation and employee health and safety. The production of
wafers and devices involves the use of certain hazardous raw materials,
including, but not limited to, ammonia, phosphine and arsene. If EMCORE's
control systems are unsuccessful in preventing release of these or other
hazardous materials, EMCORE could experience a substantial interruption of
-13-
operations. EMCORE has retained an environmental consultant to advise it in
complying with applicable environmental and health and safety laws and
regulations, and believes that it is currently, and in the past has been, in
substantial compliance with all such laws and regulations.
BACKLOG
As of September 30, 1999, EMCORE had an order backlog of $43.1 million,
scheduled to be shipped through September 30, 2000. This represented an increase
of 67% since September 30, 1998. This increase primarily relates to increased
production systems bookings in Asia and initial orders for solar cells from
Loral. EMCORE includes in backlog only customer purchase orders that have been
accepted by EMCORE and for which shipment dates have been assigned within the 12
months to follow and research contracts that are in process or awarded. Wafer
and device agreements extending longer than one year in duration are included in
backlog only for the ensuing 12 months. EMCORE receives partial advance payments
or irrevocable letters of credit on most production system orders. EMCORE
recognizes revenue from the sale of its systems and materials upon shipment. For
research contracts with the U.S. government and commercial enterprises with
durations greater than six months, EMCORE recognizes revenue to the extent of
costs incurred plus a portion of estimated gross profit, as stipulated in such
contracts, based on contract performance.
MANUFACTURING
EMCORE's manufacturing operations are located at EMCORE's headquarters
in Somerset, New Jersey and in Albuquerque, New Mexico and include systems
engineering and production, wafer fabrication, and design and production of
devices. Many of EMCORE's manufacturing operations are computer monitored or
controlled to enhance reliability and yield. EMCORE manufactures its own systems
and outsources some components and sub-assemblies, but performs all final system
integration, assembly and testing. As of September 30, 1999, EMCORE had 267
employees involved in manufacturing. EMCORE fabricates wafers and devices at its
facilities in Somerset, New Jersey and Albuquerque, New Mexico and has a
combined clean room area totaling approximately 12,000 square feet. EMCORE's
joint venture with Uniroyal Technology Corporation has begun to manufacture HB
LED wafers and package-ready devices at its Tampa, Florida manufacturing
facility. In May 1998, EMCORE received ISO 9001 and QS 9002 quality
certification for its Somerset, New Jersey facility. In November 1999, EMCORE
received ISO 9001 quality certification for its newly completed solar cell
facility in Albuquerque, New Mexico. EMCORE is pursing ISO 9001 quality
certification for its VCSEL facility in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Outside contractors and suppliers are used to supply raw materials and
standard components and to assemble portions of end systems from EMCORE
specifications. EMCORE depends on sole, or a limited number of, suppliers of
components and raw materials. EMCORE generally purchases these single or limited
source products through standard purchase orders. EMCORE also seeks to maintain
ongoing communications with its suppliers to guard against interruptions in
supply and has, to date, generally been able to obtain sufficient supplies in a
timely manner and maintains inventories it believes are sufficient to meet its
near term needs. EMCORE implemented a vendor program through which it inspects
quality and reviews suppliers and prices in order to standardize purchasing
efficiencies and design requirements to maintain as low a cost of sales as
possible. However, operating results could be materially and adversely affected
by a stoppage or delay of supply, receipt of defective parts or contaminated
materials, and increase in the pricing of such parts or EMCORE's inability to
obtain reduced pricing from its suppliers in response to competitive pressures.
COMPETITION
The markets in which EMCORE competes are highly competitive. EMCORE
competes with several companies for sales of MOCVD systems including Aixtron
GmbH and Nippon-Sanso K.K. The primary competitors for EMCORE's wafer foundry
include Epitaxial Products Inc., Kopin Corporation and Quantum Epitaxial
Designs, Inc. EMCORE's principal competitors for sales of VCSEL-related products
include Honeywell, Inc. and Mitel Corporation. The principal competitors for MR
sensors are Honeywell, Inc., Matshushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd., Siemens
AG and Asahi. The principal competitors for HB LEDs and EMCORE's joint ventures
with Uniroyal Technology Corporation and General Electric Lighting include the
Phillips Electronics and Hewlett Packard Company joint venture, Siemens AG's
Osram GmbH subsidiary, Nichia Chemical Industries and Toshiba Corporation.
EMCORE also faces competition from manufacturers that implement in-house systems
-14-
for their own use. In addition, EMCORE competes with many research institutions
and universities for research contract funding. EMCORE also sells its products
to current competitors and companies with the capability of becoming
competitors. As the markets for EMCORE's products grow, new competitors are
likely to emerge, and present competitors may increase their market share.
EMCORE believes that the primary competitive factors in the markets in
which EMCORE's products compete are yield, throughput, performance, breadth of
product line, customer satisfaction, customer commitment to competing
technologies and, in the case of production systems, capital and directs costs
and size of installed base. Competitors may develop enhancements to or future
generations of competitive products that offer superior price and performance
factors. EMCORE believes that in order to remain competitive, it must invest
significant financial resources in developing new product features and
enhancements and in maintaining customer satisfaction worldwide.
EMPLOYEES
At September 30, 1999, EMCORE had 368 full-time employees. None of
EMCORE's employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. EMCORE
considers its relationship with its employees to be good.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The following chart contains certain information regarding each of
EMCORE's principal facilities. Each of these facilities contains office space,
marketing and sales, and research and development space. EMCORE also leases
office space in Hsinchu, Taiwan and Santa Clara, California. In addition to
EMCORE's facilities, Uniroyal Optoelectronics, a joint venture between EMCORE
and Uniroyal Technology Corporation, leases a 75,000 square foot office and
manufacturing facility in Tampa, Florida.
(1) These leases all have options to renew by EMCORE, subject to cost of
living adjustments.
(2) EMCORE plans a three-phase construction project to expand the facility
from an initial 50,000 square feet in October 1998 to 70,000 square
feet by 2002.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
EMCORE is not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against it
that could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition
and results of operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
-15-
PART II.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER
MATTERS
EMCORE's common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ National Market under the
symbol "EMKR". The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low sale
prices for EMCORE's common stock during the two most recent fiscal years and
subsequent interim period.
HIGH LOW
---- ---
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998:
First Quarter.................................... $23 3/8 $15 1/2
Second Quarter................................... $19 5/8 $11
Third Quarter ................................... $16 3/4 $ 9
Fourth Quarter .................................. $13 1/2 $ 6
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999:
First Quarter.................................... $18 3/8 $ 7 1/4
Second Quarter................................... $28 3/4 $13 7/8
Third Quarter ................................... $23 $12 7/8
Fourth Quarter .................................. $25 $11 1/4
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000:
First Quarter (through December 1, 1999)......... $24 1/4 $12 1/16
The reported closing sale price of EMCORE's common stock on December 1,
1999 was $23 15/16 per share. As of December 1, 1999, EMCORE had approximately
1,838 shareholders of record.
EMCORE has never declared or paid dividends on its common stock since
its formation. EMCORE currently does not intend to pay dividends on its common
stock in the foreseeable future so that it may reinvest its earnings in its
business. The payment of dividends, if any, in the future will be at the
discretion of the Board of Directors.
The shares of EMCORE's manditorily redeemable convertible preferred
stock are entitled to receive cumulative quarterly dividends at the annual rate
of 2% of their liquidation preference ($0.28 per annum per share).
-16-
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
On November 30, 1998, EMCORE sold an aggregate of 1,550,000 shares of
Series I mandatorily redeemable convertible Preferred Stock (the "Series I
Preferred Stock") to related parties (Hakuto Company, Uniroyal Technology
Corporation and Union Miniere, Inc.) for an aggregate consideration of $21.7
million before deducting costs and expenses of the offering which amounted to
approximately $500,000. The shares of Series I Preferred Stock are convertible,
at any time, at the option of the holders thereof, unless previously redeemed,
into shares of common stock at an initial conversion price of $14.00 per share
of common stock, subject to adjustment in certain cases. The Series I Preferred
Stock is redeemable, in whole or in part, at the option of EMCORE at any time
the common stock has traded at or above $28.00 per share for 30 consecutive
trading days, at a price of $14.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends,
if any, to the redemption date. In addition, the Series I Preferred Stock is
subject to mandatory redemption by November 17, 2003. EMCORE believes the sale
of the shares of Series I Preferred Stock is exempt from registration pursuant
to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
Act").
On May 27, 1999, EMCORE issued 282,010 warrants to General Electric to
purchase common stock at $22.875 per share. These warrants are exercisable at
any time and will expire in 2006. These warrants were granted in connection with
EMCORE's initial capital contribution of $7.8 million into GELcore. In order to
fund its initial capital contribution for GELcore, EMCORE borrowed $7.8 million
from General Electric in the form of a convertible subordinated debenture (the
"Debenture"), with an interest rate of 4.75% and a May 2006 maturity date. The
Debenture is convertible into EMCORE common stock at a conversion price of
$22.875 or 340,984 shares. The Debenture is convertible at any time at the
option of General Electric and may be called by EMCORE after three years, if the
price of EMCORE's common stock has traded at or above $34 for at least thirty
days. EMCORE believes the issuance of the warrants was exempt from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data for the five most
recent fiscal years ended September 30, 1999 of EMCORE is qualified by reference
to and should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and the Notes
thereto, and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations included elsewhere in this document. The Statement of
Operations Data set forth below with respect to fiscal years 1997, 1998 and 1999
and the Balance Sheet Data as of September 30, 1998 and 1999 are derived from
EMCORE's audited financial statements included elsewhere in this document. The
Statement of Income Data for fiscal years 1995 and 1996 and the Balance Sheet
Data as of September 30, 1995, 1996 and 1997 are derived from audited financial
statements not included herein.
On December 5, 1997, EMCORE acquired MODE in a stock transaction
accounted for under the purchase method of accounting for a purchase price of
$32.8 million. In connection with this transaction, EMCORE recorded a
non-recurring, non-cash charge of $19.5 million for acquired in-process research
and development, which affects the comparability of EMCORE's operating results
and financial condition.
-17-
-18-
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
EMCORE designs, develops and manufactures compound semiconductor
materials and is a leading developer and manufacturer of the tools and
manufacturing processes used to fabricate compound semiconductor wafers and
devices. EMCORE's vertically-integrated product offering allows it to provide a
complete compound semiconductor solution to its customers. EMCORE assists its
customers with device design, process development and optimal configuration of
TurboDisc(TM) production systems.
EMCORE recognizes revenue upon shipment. Systems-related revenues
include sales of EMCORE's TurboDisc(TM) production systems as well as spare
parts and services. The book-to-ship time period on systems is approximately
four to six months, and the average selling price is in excess of $1.0 million.
For systems, EMCORE incurs certain installation and warranty costs subsequent to
shipment which are estimated and accrued at the time the sale is recognized.
EMCORE reserves for estimated returns and allowances at the time of shipment.
Materials revenues include wafers, devices and process development technology.
The materials sales cycle is generally shorter than for systems and average
selling prices vary significantly based on the products and services provided.
Generally, EMCORE achieves a higher gross profit on its materials related
products.
EMCORE has recently established a number of strategic relationships
through joint ventures, long-term supply agreements and an acquisition as
summarized below:
o In May 1999, EMCORE and General Electric Lighting formed GELcore, a
joint venture to develop and market HB LED lighting products. General
Electric Lighting and EMCORE have agreed that this joint venture will
be the exclusive vehicle for each party's participation in solid
state lighting. GELcore seeks to combine EMCORE's materials science
expertise, process technology and compound semiconductor production
systems with General Electric Lighting's brand name recognition and
extensive marketing and distribution capabilities. GELcore's
long-term goal is to develop products to replace traditional
lighting. EMCORE has invested $7.8 million in GELcore and has
seconded various employees to the joint venture to assist in the
development of products.
o In May 1999, EMCORE signed a long-term agreement with Sumitomo
Electric Industries, Ltd. (Hyogo, Japan) to jointly develop and
produce Indium Gallium Phosphide (InGaP) epitaxial wafers for use as
Heterojunction Bipolar Transistor (HBT) devices used in digital
wireless and cellular applications. Sumitomo Electric is one of the
world's leading electronics manufacturers. These advanced compound
semiconductor HBT wafers will be produced at EMCORE's Epitaxial
Materials (E2M) wafer foundry in Somerset, New Jersey, and shipments
of commercial product are expected to begin in February 2000.
o In November 1998, EMCORE signed a long-term supply agreement with
Space Systems/Loral, a wholly owned subsidiary of Loral Space &
Communications. Under this agreement, EMCORE will supply compound
semiconductor high-efficiency gallium arsenide solar cells for
Loral's satellites. EMCORE received purchase orders from Space
Systems/Loral that total $7.2 million and expects to service this
agreement through our newly completed facility in Albuquerque, New
Mexico. EMCORE plans to start shipping solar cells as early as
December 1999 and a majority of the solar cell shipments are
scheduled for the second fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2000. This
facility presently employs approximately 53 people, including sales
and marketing, administrative and manufacturing personnel.
o In November 1998, EMCORE formed UMCore, a joint venture with Union
Miniere Inc., a mining and materials company, to explore and develop
alternate uses for germanium using EMCORE's materials science and
production platform expertise and Union Miniere's access to and
experience with germanium. EMCORE has seconded various personnel to
the joint venture to assist in the development of products.
-19-
o In October 1998, EMCORE formed Emtech, a joint venture with Optek
Technology, Inc., a packager and distributor of optoelectronic
devices, to market an expanded line of magneto resistive sensors to
the automotive and related industries. This joint venture combines
EMCORE's expertise in the manufacture of magneto resistive die and
Optek's expertise in packaging these die. This combination will allow
us to offer customers off-the-shelf products. No additional personnel
are anticipated to meet the obligations to the joint venture.
o In September 1998, EMCORE entered into an agreement with Lockheed
Martin to provide technical management and support for the
commercialization of a new high-efficiency solar cell. It is
anticipated that we will provide high efficiency solar cells to
Lockheed Martin upon completion of the research and development
agreement. EMCORE's new facility in Albuquerque, New Mexico, will
provide the support necessary to meet our obligations under this
agreement.
o In September 1998, EMCORE also signed a four-year purchase agreement
with AMP Incorporated to provide high speed VCSELs, for use in
transceivers for high-speed networks that link computers. The
contract requires AMP to purchase a minimum of 80% of their VCSEL
needs from EMCORE. EMCORE's MODE facility in Albuquerque, New Mexico,
will produce the devices under this contract.
o In December 1997, the Company and a wholly owned subsidiary of
Uniroyal Technology Corporation formed Uniroyal Optoelectronics LLC,
a joint venture, to manufacture, sell and distribute High Brightness
(HB) LED wafers and package-ready devices. This joint venture
commenced operations in July 1998. EMCORE has invested $6.0 million
in Uniroyal Optoelectronics and has seconded various employees to the
joint venture to assist in the development of products. Uniroyal
Optoelectronics is hiring its own administrative and management
personnel. The impact on EMCORE's operations will be limited to a few
seconded employees who will continue to be managed by EMCORE
personnel.
o In December 1997, EMCORE acquired MODE in a stock transaction
accounted for under the purchase method of accounting for a purchase
price of $32.8 million. This acquisition allowed EMCORE to expand its
technology base into the data communications and telecommunications
markets. MODE, a development stage company, constituted a significant
and strategic investment for EMCORE to acquire and gain access to
MODE's in-process research and development of micro-optical
technology. As part of this acquisition, EMCORE incurred a one-time
in-process research and development write-off of $19.5 million.
EMCORE also recorded goodwill of approximately $13.2 million, which
is being charged against operations over a three-year period, and
will therefore impact financial results through December 2000. These
operations are located in Albuquerque, New Mexico and currently
employ approximately 39 people including sales and marketing,
administrative and manufacturing personnel.
Because EMCORE does not have a controlling economic and voting interest
in the Uniroyal Technology, Union Miniere, Optek and General Electric Lighting
joint ventures, EMCORE accounts for these joint ventures under the equity method
of accounting and, as such, our share of profits and losses are included below
the operating income line in our statements of operations.
EMCORE has generated a significant portion of its sales to customers
outside the United States. In fiscal 1997, 1998 and 1999, international sales
constituted 42.0%, 39.1% and 52.5%, respectively, of revenues. In fiscal year
1999, the majority of EMCORE's international sales were made to customers in
Asia, particularly in Taiwan. EMCORE's sales revenues from Europe have
fluctuated because most of our sales of TurboDisc(TM) systems are to a limited
number of customers, who do not purchase production systems regularly. EMCORE
anticipates that international sales will continue to account for a significant
portion of revenues. Historically, we have received all payments for products
and services in U.S. dollars. We do not anticipate that Europe's Euro-currency
conversion will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
-20-
The following chart contains a breakdown of EMCORE's worldwide revenues
and percentages by geographic region.
As of September 30, 1999, EMCORE had an order backlog of $43.1 million
scheduled to be shipped through September 30, 2000. This represented an increase
of 67% since September 30, 1998, which primarily relates to increased systems
bookings in Asia and initial orders for solar cells from Loral. EMCORE includes
in backlog only customer purchase orders that have been accepted by EMCORE and
for which shipment dates have been assigned within the 12 months to follow and
research contracts that are in process or awarded. Wafer and device agreements
extending longer than one year in duration are included in backlog only for the
ensuing 12 months. EMCORE receives partial advance payments or irrevocable
letters of credit on most production system orders.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:
The following table sets forth the statement of operations data of
EMCORE expressed as a percentage of total revenues for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 1997, 1998 and 1999.
-21-
COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND 1999
REVENUES. EMCORE's revenues increased 33.3% from $43.8 million for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 1998 to $58.3 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1999. The revenue increase was attributable to increased revenues
in the systems-related product lines. Revenues from systems-related sales and
materials-related sales were $26.3 million and $17.4 million, respectively, for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998 and $44.5 million and $13.9 million,
respectively, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999. As a percentage of
revenues, systems- and materials-related revenues accounted for 60.2% and 39.8%,
respectively, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998 and 76.2% and 23.8%,
respectively, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999. EMCORE expects the
product mix between systems and materials to approach 50% as new products such
as solar cells, VCSELS and HBT's are introduced and production of commercial
volumes of these materials commences. International sales accounted for 39.1% of
revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998 and 52.5% of revenues for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999.
COST OF REVENUES/GROSS PROFIT. Cost of sales includes direct material and labor
costs, allocated manufacturing and service overhead, and installation and
warranty costs. EMCORE's gross profit increased 32.0% from $19.1 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 1998, to $25.2 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1999. As a percentage of revenue, gross profit decreased slightly
from 43.6% of revenue for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998 to 43.2% of
revenue for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999. During the first half of
fiscal year 1999, EMCORE sold three compound semiconductor production systems
for approximately $5.3 million to a joint venture in which it has a 49% minority
interest. EMCORE deferred $1.3 million of gross profit on such sales. Such
deferred gross profit will be recognized ratably over the assigned life of the
production systems purchased by the joint venture.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased by 2.5% from $14.1 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1998 to $14.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
1999. As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased from 32.2% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998 to 24.7% for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999.
GOODWILL AMORTIZATION. Goodwill of $13.2 million was recorded in connection with
our acquisition of MODE on December 5, 1997. EMCORE recognized approximately
$4.4 million of goodwill amortization for the fiscal year ended September 30,
1999, reflecting a full year of amortization. As of September 30, 1999, EMCORE
had approximately $5.1 million of net goodwill remaining, which will be fully
amortized by December 2000.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Recurring research and development expenses increased
25.6% from $16.5 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998 to $20.7
million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999. As a percentage of revenue,
recurring research and development expenses decreased from 37.7% for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 1998 to 35.5% for the fiscal year ended September 30,
1999. The increase in research and development spending was primarily
attributable to EMCORE's acquisition of MODE, the startup of our new
Albuquerque, New Mexico facility and increased staffing and equipment costs
necessary to enhance current products and develop new product offerings.
Products introduced or under development include HB LEDs, high efficiency solar
cells, new generation TurboDisc(TM) production systems, VCSELs, RF materials and
other optoelectronic devices. In fiscal year 1998, EMCORE recognized a $19.5
million one-time charge for acquired in-process research and development
relating to the purchase of MODE. To maintain growth and to continue to pursue
market leadership in materials science technology, EMCORE expects to continue to
invest a significant amount of its resources in research and development.
OPERATING LOSS. EMCORE reported a 58.6% decrease in operating loss from $34.6
million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998, as compared to an
operating loss of $14.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999.
The change in operating loss was principally due to the $19.5 million one-time
charge for acquired in-process research and development in 1998. In fiscal year
1999, EMCORE deferred $1.3 million of gross profit on three compound
semiconductor production systems sold to a joint venture in which it has a 49%
minority interest. In addition, EMCORE's fiscal year 1999 operating loss was
impacted by increased research and development spending, the loss generated from
the operations of MODE and the startup expenses associated with the opening of
EMCORE's new Albuquerque, New Mexico facility.
-22-
OTHER EXPENSE. During fiscal 1996, EMCORE issued 2,575,883 detachable warrants
along with subordinated notes to certain of its existing shareholders. EMCORE
subsequently assigned a value to these detachable warrants issued using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. EMCORE recorded the subordinated notes at a
carrying value that is subject to periodic accretions, using the interest
method. In June 1998, EMCORE issued 284,684 warrants to its Chairman and its
Chief Executive Officer for providing a guarantee in connection with an 18-month
credit facility with First Union National Bank. EMCORE also assigned a value to
these warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The consequent
expense of the subordinated note accretion and warrant value amortization is
charged to "Imputed warrant interest, non-cash" and equals approximately
$601,000 and $950,000 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1998 and 1999,
respectively. The subordinated notes and the 18-month credit facility were
repaid using a portion of the proceeds from the public offering, which was
completed in June 1999.
In order to fund its initial capital contribution for GELcore, EMCORE
borrowed $7.8 million from General Electric in the form of a convertible
subordinated debenture (the "Debenture"), with an interest rate of 4.75% and a
May 2006 maturity date. In connection with the funding of EMCORE's initial
capital contribution, General Electric received 282,010 warrants to purchase
common stock at $22.875 per share. These warrants are exercisable at any time
and will expire in 2006. EMCORE subsequently assigned a value to these warrants
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The warrant value of $2.6 million
is included in other assets and is being amortized over seven years. The
consequent expense of the warrant amortization is charged to "Imputed warrant
interest, non-cash" and equaled approximately $186,000 for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1999.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999, stated interest expense,
net decreased by $107,000 to $866,000. On June 15, 1999, EMCORE completed the
issuance of an additional 3.0 million common stock shares through a public
offering, which resulted in proceeds of $52.0 million, net of issuance costs. A
significant portion of the proceeds was used to repay all outstanding bank loans
and subordinated notes.
Because EMCORE does not have a controlling economic and voting interest
in the Uniroyal Technology, Union Miniere and General Electric Lighting joint
ventures, EMCORE accounts for these joint ventures under the equity method of
accounting. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998, EMCORE incurred a net
loss of $198,000 related to the Uniroyal joint venture. For the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1999, EMCORE incurred a net loss of $2.2 million related to
the Uniroyal joint venture, a $2.5 million net loss related to the GELcore joint
venture and a $297,000 net loss related to the UMCore joint venture.
INCOME TAXES. As a result of its losses, EMCORE did not incur any income tax
expense in both fiscal years 1998 and 1999. As of September 30, 1999, EMCORE has
net operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes of approximately $24.0
million, which expire in the years 2003 through 2019. EMCORE believes that the
consummation of certain equity transactions and a significant change in the
ownership during fiscal years 1995, 1998 and 1999 has constituted a change in
control under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Due to the change in
control, EMCORE's ability to use its federal net operating loss carryovers and
federal research credit carryovers to offset future income and income taxes,
respectively, are subject to annual limitations under Internal Revenue Code
Sections 382 and 383.
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM. On June 15, 1999, EMCORE repaid its outstanding bank loans
using a portion of the proceeds from the public offering. EMCORE also used a
portion of the net proceeds to repurchase its outstanding 6.0% subordinated
notes due 2001. The early extinguishment of debt resulted in an extraordinary
charge of $1.3 million or $0.13 per share in fiscal year 1999 that consisted of
$867,000 related to the discount on prepayment of the subordinated notes and
$467,000 related to the write-off of related deferred financing costs.
NET LOSS. EMCORE reported a 37.7% decrease in net loss from $36.4 million for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998, as compared to a net loss of $22.7
million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999. The decrease in the
year-to-date loss was attributable to the $19.5 million write-off of acquired
in-process research and development in connection with the acquisition of MODE
on December 5, 1997 offset in part by an increase in recurring research and
development expenses and the net loss from unconsolidated affiliates.
-23-
COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND 1998
REVENUES. EMCORE's revenues decreased 8.4% from $47.8 million for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 1997 to $43.8 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1998. The revenue decrease represented a shift in product mix
during the year. Systems-related revenues decreased approximately 22.8% while
materials-related revenues increased approximately 27.6%. The decrease in
systems-related revenues was primarily attributable to the financial issues in
the Asian economies as well as a general slowdown in the semiconductor equipment
market overall. While materials-related revenues did experience a 27.6%
increase, the General Motors three-month strike adversely affected revenue, as
shipments to General Motors were halted during the strike. Systems-related
revenues were $34.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 and
$26.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998. Materials-related
revenues were $13.7 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 and
$17.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998. As a percentage of
revenues, systems-related revenues accounted for 71.4% for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1997 and 60.2% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998. As a
percentage of revenues, materials-related revenues accounted for 28.6% for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 and 39.8% for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1998. International sales accounted for approximately 42.0% and
39.1% of revenues for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1997 and 1998,
respectively.
COST OF REVENUES/GROSS PROFIT. Cost of sales includes direct material and labor
costs, allocated manufacturing and service overhead, and installation and
warranty costs. Gross profit increased from 37.0% of revenue to 43.6% of revenue
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1997 and 1998, respectively. The gross
profit percentage increase was attributable to a shift in product mix towards
higher gross margin materials-related revenues.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased by 50.7% from $9.3 million for the year ended September 30,
1997, to $14.1 million for the year ended September 30, 1998. The increase was
largely due to sales personnel headcount increases to support both domestic and
foreign markets and general headcount additions to sustain the internal
administrative support necessary for EMCORE's expanded product lines and new
locations. During fiscal 1998, EMCORE wrote-off a $1.0 million receivable due
from an Asian customer which was deemed to be uncollectible. As a percentage of
revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses increased from 19.6% of
revenue during fiscal 1997 to 32.2% of revenue for fiscal 1998.
GOODWILL AMORTIZATION. In connection with the purchase of MODE, EMCORE recorded
goodwill of $13.2 million that is being amortized over 36 months. Goodwill
amortization expense amounted to $3.6 million for the year ended September 30,
1998. Net goodwill at September 30, 1998 was $9.5 million.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Recurring research and development expenses increased
by 83.3% from $9.0 million for the year ended September 30, 1997, to $16.5
million for the year ended September 30, 1998. The increase was primarily
attributable to EMCORE's acquisition of MODE and increased staffing and
equipment costs necessary to enhance current products and develop new product
offerings. Products introduced or under development include HB LEDs, high
efficiency solar cells, new generation TurboDisc(TM) production systems, VCSELs
and other optoelectronic devices. For the year ended September 30, 1998, EMCORE
incurred $1.1 million of research and development costs associated with MODE's
in-process (at the date of acquisition) research and development projects. As a
percentage of revenue, research and development expenses increased from 18.8% of
revenue during fiscal 1997 to 37.7% of revenue for fiscal 1998. To maintain
growth and market leadership in epitaxial technology, EMCORE expects to continue
to invest a significant amount of its resources in research and development. In
connection with the MODE acquisition, EMCORE incurred a one-time charge for the
write-off of acquired in-process research and development amounting to $19.5
million. The acquisition of MODE, a development stage company, constituted a
significant and strategic investment for EMCORE. The principal investment
consideration was to acquire and gain access to MODE's micro-optical technology,
which was under development at the time. EMCORE plans to use MODE's
micro-optical laser technology in new products for data communications and
telecommunications applications.
-24-
OPERATING LOSS. During fiscal 1998, operating loss increased from a loss of $0.7
million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 to a loss of $34.6 million
for the year ended September 30, 1998. The change in operating loss was
primarily due to the $19.5 million one-time charge for in-process research and
development written off in connection with the purchase of MODE. Additionally,
recurring research and development expense increased by $7.5 million from the
prior year, as a result of increased research and development activities at MODE
and in our core business. In addition, the General Motors three-month strike
adversely affected operating performance as shipments to General Motors were
halted during the strike. General Motors is among EMCORE's largest customers.
EMCORE was unable to furlough or reduce their workforce during the strike and
thereby incurred charges without the benefit of related revenues.
OTHER EXPENSE. Other expenses decreased, particularly due to the reduced imputed
warrant interest expense associated with EMCORE's subordinated debt and debt
issuance guarantee cost. During fiscal 1996, EMCORE issued detachable warrants
along with subordinated notes to certain of its existing shareholders. In fiscal
1997, EMCORE also issued detachable warrants in return for a $10.0 million
demand note facility guarantee by the Chairman of the Board of EMCORE, who
provided collateral for the facility. EMCORE subsequently assigned a value to
these detachable warrants issued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
EMCORE recorded the subordinated notes at a carrying value that is subject to
periodic accretions, using the interest method, and reflected the facility's
detachable warrant value as debt issuance cost which was written off in its
entirety in fiscal 1997. The consequent expense of these subordinated note
accretion amounts and the now terminated facility's debt issuance cost is
charged to "imputed warrant interest, non-cash," and amounted to approximately
$4.0 million and $601,000 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1997 and
1998, respectively. In June 1998, EMCORE issued 284,684 warrants to its Chairman
and its Chief Executive Officer for providing a guarantee in connection with the
1998 Agreement, an $8.0 million 18-month credit facility with First Union
National Bank. EMCORE assigned a value to these warrants using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model.
INCOME TAXES. EMCORE's effective income tax rate was 2.5% in fiscal 1997 and
0.0% in fiscal 1998. The lower effective rate in fiscal 1998, relative to fiscal
1997, was attributable to a federal income tax benefit offset by net operating
loss and expenses not utilized or deductible for tax purposes.
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM. In the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997, EMCORE repaid
$2.0 million of its outstanding subordinated notes due May 1, 2001. In
connection with this discharge of EMCORE's subordinated notes, an extraordinary
loss of $285,000 was recognized in fiscal 1997 relating to such early
extinguishment of debt.
NET LOSS. Net loss increased from $5.6 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1997 to $36.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
1998. This increase was primarily attributable to the acquisition of MODE and
subsequent write-off of in-process research and development of $19.5 million as
well as an increase in recurring research and development expenses of $7.5
million. In addition, the General Motors three-month prolonged strike adversely
affected operating performance.
-25-
QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following tables present EMCORE's unaudited results of operations
expressed in dollars and as a percentage of revenues for the eight most recently
ended fiscal quarters. EMCORE believes that all necessary adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, have been included in the
amounts below to present fairly the selected quarterly information when read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included
elsewhere in this document. EMCORE's results from operations may vary
substantially from quarter to quarter. Accordingly, the operating results for a
quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any subsequent quarter or
for the full year.
-26-
From inception through December 31, 1996, EMCORE derived the majority of
its revenues from the sale of TurboDisc(TM) production systems. Beginning in
January 1997, EMCORE expanded its product line to offer wafers and devices.
Throughout fiscal year 1997 and the first half of fiscal year 1998, EMCORE
benefited from the expanded product offerings. Early in fiscal year 1998, the
capital equipment market experienced a downturn and bookings of TurboDisc(TM)
systems decreased substantially. The result was lower revenues for the last two
quarters of fiscal year 1998 and the first quarter of fiscal year 1999. Since
then, the bookings of TurboDisc(TM) systems has substantially increased as well
as bookings for our materials-related products. EMCORE's backlog at September
30, 1999 was $43.1 million, which represents the highest amount for any year-end
in the Company's history
Cost of sales was also affected by revenue shifts. Gross profit improved
consistently from the introduction of the new product lines through the second
quarter of fiscal year 1998. Thereafter, in late fiscal year 1998 and into the
early part of fiscal year 1999, gross profit was affected primarily by reduced
revenues and the resulting under-absorbed overhead. Since then, with increased
revenues, gross profit has increased at a relatively consistent percentage rate.
Operating expenses have generally increased both in absolute dollars and
as a percentage of revenues, due to increased staffing in research and
development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative functions. The
increase in research expenditures was related to the development of systems for
the processing of gallium nitride materials used in the production of blue HB
LEDs, enhancement of production systems, and the introduction of wafers and
devices, in particular, MR sensors, VCSELs and solar cells. Selling, general and
administrative expenses increased as a result of increased marketing and sales
related activities, including the hiring of additional personnel, commissions,
customer samples, expansion of facilities, and the opening of field offices in
Taiwan and California.
EMCORE has experienced and expects to continue to experience significant
fluctuations in quarterly results. Factors which have had an influence on and
may continue to influence EMCORE's operating results in a particular quarter
include, but are not limited to, the timing of receipt of orders, cancellation,
rescheduling or delay in product shipment or supply deliveries, product mix,
competitive pricing pressures, EMCORE's ability to design, manufacture and ship
products on a cost effective and timely basis, including the ability of EMCORE
to achieve and maintain acceptable production yields for wafers and devices,
regional economic conditions and the announcement and introduction of new
products by EMCORE and by its competitors. The timing of sales of EMCORE's
TurboDisc(TM) production systems may cause substantial fluctuations in quarterly
operating results due to the substantially higher per unit price of these
products relative to EMCORE's other products. If the compound semiconductor
industry experiences downturns or slowdowns, EMCORE's business, financial
condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents increased by $2.7 million from $4.5 million at
September 30, 1998 to $7.2 million at September 30, 1999. For the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1999, net cash used for operations amounted to $15.2
million, primarily due to EMCORE's net loss, an increase in accounts receivable
and a decrease in accounts payable.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999, net cash used for
investment activities amounted to $31.3 million, primarily due to the purchase
and manufacture of new equipment for the facilitation of EMCORE's wafer and
device product lines, and clean room modifications and enhancements of
approximately $17.1 million, as well as investments in unconsolidated affiliates
of approximately $14.2 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1999 amounted to approximately $49.2 million, primarily due to the
$52.0 million of net proceeds from the public offering in June 1999, $21.2
million of net proceeds from the private placement of preferred stock in
November 1998 and long-term convertible subordinated debenture of $7.8 million.
This was offset by debt repayments of $33.5 million on bank loans, short-term
related party debt and subordinated debt.
-27-
In March 1997, the Company entered into a $10.0 million loan agreement
with First Union National Bank (the "Loan Agreement") that had an interest rate
of Prime plus 50 basis points (8.75% at September 30, 1998). As of September 30,
1998, the Company had $9,950,000 outstanding under this facility. As of
September 30, 1999, there were no amounts outstanding under this facility. The
Loan Agreement contains financial covenants which, among other things, require
maintenance of certain financial ratios, liquidity and net worth. As a result of
the net loss for certain quarters in the years ended September 30, 1998 and
1999, the Company was not in compliance with the Loan Agreement's debt
covenants. The Company received a waiver from the bank regarding this
non-compliance. Subsequent to year-end 1999, the Company's Loan Agreement was
extended through January 31, 2001. The Loan Agreement's financial covenants were
modified under the third amendment, and management believes that the Company
will be able to comply with such requirements throughout fiscal year 2000.
EMCORE's planned capital expenditures are expected to total
approximately $16.8 million during fiscal year 2000, including approximately
$7.8 million in expenditures related to investments in our joint ventures.
Capital spending in fiscal year 2000 also is expected to include upgrading
manufacturing facilities, continued investment in analytical and diagnostic
research and development equipment, upgrading and purchasing computer equipment
and the manufacture of TurboDisc(TM) systems for in-house use.
EMCORE believes that its current liquidity, together with available
credit, should be sufficient to meet its cash needs for working capital through
fiscal year 2000. However, if the available credit facilities, cash generated
from operations and cash on hand are not sufficient to satisfy EMCORE's
liquidity requirements, EMCORE will seek to obtain additional equity or debt
financing. Additional funding may not be available when needed or on terms
acceptable to EMCORE. If EMCORE is required to raise additional financing and if
adequate funds are not available or not available on acceptable terms, the
ability to continue to fund expansion, develop and enhance products and
services, or otherwise respond to competitive pressures will be severely
limited. Such a limitation could have a material adverse effect on EMCORE's
business, financial condition or operations.
In January 1999, Rockwell settled litigation that challenged the
validity of certain patents which EMCORE licensed from Rockwell prior to the
commencement of the litigation. As a result of this settlement, EMCORE will be
required to pay Rockwell a royalty including interest under our license
agreement relating to TurboDisc(TM) tools. EMCORE believes it has adequately
accrued for these royalties. In addition, prior to the commencement of the
litigation, EMCORE had initiated discussions with Rockwell to receive additional
licenses to permit EMCORE to use the technology to manufacture and sell wafers
and devices. EMCORE may be required to pay royalties to Rockwell for certain
past sales of wafers and devices to customers who do not hold licenses directly
from Rockwell. Management has reviewed and reassessed the royalty agreements and
concluded that it has the appropriate amounts reserved for at both September 30,
1998 and 1999. We are currently negotiating with Rockwell to obtain the
necessary licenses to continue to manufacture and sell wafers and devices. The
Rockwell patent expires in January 2000. The failure to obtain licenses to
manufacture these wafers and devices on commercially reasonable terms may
materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations through January 2000.
-28-
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
Many currently installed computer systems and software products are
coded to accept or recognize only two digit entries in the date code field.
These systems and software products will need to accept four digit entries to
distinguish 21st century dates from 20th century dates. As a result, computer
systems and/or software used by many companies and governmental agencies may
need to be upgraded to comply with such Year 2000 requirements or risk system
failure or miscalculations causing disruptions of normal business activities.
STATE OF READINESS. EMCORE has made an assessment of the Year 2000
readiness of its operating financial and administrative systems, including the
hardware and software that support such systems. EMCORE's assessment plan
consisted of:
(1) contacting third-party vendors and licensors of material
hardware, software and services that are both directly and
indirectly related to EMCORE's business;
(2) contacting vendors of third-party systems;
(3) assessing repair or replacement requirements;
(4) implementing repair or replacement; and
(5) creating contingency plans in the event of Year 2000
failures.
Our compound semiconductor wafers and devices are date insensitive and,
therefore, do not have any Year 2000 issues associated with them. Our
TurboDisc(TM) production systems have several components that could give rise to
Year 2000 compliance concerns. We have assessed the Year 2000 issues associated
with these components and have found that they have either been certified by the
vendor to be compliant or are date insensitive.
Our principal concern has been the status of our operating, financial
and administrative systems. These systems include accounting and production
control software at our New Jersey and the two New Mexico facilities. All
software has been certified as Year 2000 compliant by the vendors.
There are other information technology systems and non-information
technology systems that could give rise to Year 2000 concerns. These include
scientific and engineering applications, desktop applications (such as Microsoft
Word and Excel) and facilities controls such as HVAC and security. A review of
these systems leads us to believe that the systems are Year 2000 compliant, are
not critical to business operations, are used on a limited basis or are date
insensitive.
COSTS. To date, EMCORE has not incurred any material expenditures in connection
with identifying, evaluating or addressing Year 2000 compliance issues. Most of
EMCORE expenses have related to, and are expected to continue to relate to, the
operating costs associated with time spent by employees in the evaluation
process and Year 2000 compliance matters generally. The exact costs related to
Year 2000 compliance are difficult to determine EMCORE's costs for bringing our
in-house information technology systems into compliance should not exceed
$200,000. EMCORE does not anticipate that remediation expenses will be material.
If the remediation expenses are higher than anticipated EMCORE's business,
financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected.
RISKS. EMCORE is not currently aware of any Year 2000 compliance problems
relating to its systems that would have a material adverse effect on EMCORE's
business, results of operations and financial condition. There can be no
assurance that EMCORE will not discover Year 2000 compliance problems in its
systems that will require substantial revision. In addition, there can be no
assurance that third-party software, hardware or services incorporated into
EMCORE's material systems will not need to be revised or replaced, all of which
could be time-consuming and expensive. The failure of EMCORE to fix or replace
its internally developed proprietary software or third-party software, hardware
or services on a timely basis could result in lost revenues, increased operating
costs, the loss of customers and other business interruptions, any of which
could have a material adverse effect on EMCORE's business, result of operations
and financial condition. In addition, the failure of governmental agencies,
utility companies, third-party service providers and others outside of EMCORE's
control to be Year 2000 compliant could result in systemic failure beyond
EMCORE's control such as a telecommunications or electrical failure, which could
have a material adverse effect on EMCORE's business, results of operations and
financial condition.
-29-
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In March 1998, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
("AICPA") issued Statement of Position ("SOP") 98-l, "Accounting for the Cost of
Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use" ("SOP 98-1"). SOP 98-l
provides guidance over accounting for computer software developed or obtained
for internal use including the requirement to capitalize specified costs and
amortization of such costs. EMCORE will be required to adopt this standard in
its fiscal year ending September 30, 2000. EMCORE does not expect the adoption
of this standard to have a material effect on results of operations, financial
position or cash flows.
In April 1998, the AICPA issued SOP 98-5, "Reporting on the Costs of
Start-Up Activities". SOP 98-5 provides guidance on the financial reporting of
start-up costs and organization costs. It requires costs of start-up activities
and organization costs to be expensed as incurred. EMCORE will be required to
adopt this standard in its fiscal year ending September 30, 2000. The adoption
of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on EMCORE's results
of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities." This statement establishes accounting and
reporting standards for derivative instruments and requires recognition of all
derivatives as assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and
measurement of these instruments at fair value. The statement, as amended, is
effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. EMCORE will be
required to adopt this standard, as amended, in its fiscal year ending September
30, 2001. Management believes that adopting this statement will not have a
material impact on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows
of EMCORE.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
During fiscal years 1998 and 1999, EMCORE was not a party to any
derivative contracts, hedging or other material market risk transactions.
-30-
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
EMCORE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND 1999
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF
THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
-31-
EMCORE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, 1998 AND 1999
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
-32-
EMCORE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, 1998 AND 1999
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
-33-
EMCORE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, 1998 AND 1999
(IN THOUSANDS)
-34-
EMCORE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED
FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, 1998 AND 1999
(IN THOUSANDS)
Reference is made to Note 8 - Debt Facilities - for disclosure relating to
certain non-cash warrant issuance.
Reference is made to Note 11 - Stockholders' Equity - for disclosure relating to
certain non-cash equity transactions.
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
-35-
EMCORE CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of September 30, 1998 and 1999 and for the years ended September 30, 1997,
1998 and 1999
NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
EMCORE Corporation (the "Company"), a New Jersey Corporation, designs, develops
and manufactures compound semiconductor materials and is a leading developer and
manufacturer of the tools and manufacturing processes used to fabricate compound
semiconductor wafers and devices. EMCORE's products and technology enable its
customers, both in the United States and internationally, to manufacture
commercial volumes of high-performance electronic devices using compound
semiconductors. EMCORE has recently established a number of strategic
relationships through joint ventures, long-term supply agreements and an
acquisition in order to facilitate the development and manufacture of new
products in targeted growth markets. EMCORE's products are used for a wide
variety of applications in the communications (satellite, data,
telecommunications and wireless), consumer and automotive electronics, computers
and peripherals, and lighting markets. The Company offers its customers a
complete, vertically integrated solution for the design, development and
production of compound semiconductor wafers and devices.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION. The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and it's wholly owned subsidiary. The equity method of
accounting is used for unconsolidated affiliates where the Company exercises
significant influence, generally when ownership is at least 20% and not more
than 50%. All intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated upon
consolidation. Prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the
current period financial statement presentation.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS. The Company considers all highly liquid short-term
investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be
cash equivalents. The Company had approximately $3.0 million and $5.7 million in
cash equivalents at September 30, 1998 and 1999, respectively.
INVENTORIES. Inventories are stated at the lower of FIFO (first-in, first-out)
cost or market. Reserves are established for slow moving or obsolete inventory
based upon historical and anticipated usage.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT. Property and equipment are stated at cost. Significant
renewals and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs, which do not
extend the useful lives of the respective assets, are expensed. Depreciation is
recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
applicable assets, which range from three to five years. Leasehold improvements
are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the related leases
or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is less.
Depreciation expense includes the amortization of capital lease assets. When
assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the assets and related accumulated
depreciation accounts are adjusted accordingly, and any resulting gain or loss
is recorded in current operations.
LONG-LIVED ASSETS. The carrying amount of long-lived assets are reviewed on a
regular basis for the existence of facts or circumstances, both internally and
externally, that suggest impairment. To date no such impairment has been
indicated. The Company determines if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset
is impaired based on anticipated undiscounted cash flows before interest. In the
event of an impairment, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the
carrying amount exceeds fair value of the asset. Fair value is determined
primarily using the anticipated cash flows before interest, discounted at a rate
commensurate with the risk involved.
-36-
DEFERRED COSTS. Included in other assets are various deferred costs and warrant
valuation costs. The deferred costs are primarily related to obtaining product
patents that are being amortized over five years. Total amortization expense
amounted to approximately $40,000 $79,000 and $143,000 for the years ended
September 30, 1997, 1998 and 1999, respectively. During the year ended September
30, 1998, EMCORE issued 284,684 common stock purchase warrants in exchange for
the guaranteeing of a credit facility by both the Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of EMCORE. These warrants were assigned a value of $1.3 million using
the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model ("Black-Scholes"). Amortization expense,
recorded as imputed warrant interest expense, related to these warrants amounted
to $219,000 and $657,000 for the years ended September 30, 1998 and 1999,
respectively. On June 15, 1999 with the completion of EMCORE's public offering,
this credit facility was cancelled, and the remaining $434,000 of this warrant
valuation was recognized as an extraordinary charge related to the early
extinguishment of debt. Also, during the year ended September 30, 1999, EMCORE
issued 282,010 common stock purchase warrants to General Electric for financing
EMCORE's initial capital contribution in the GELcore joint venture through the
issuance of a $7.8 million subordinated debenture. The warrants were assigned a
value of $2.6 million also using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Amortization expense related to these warrants, also recorded as imputed warrant
interest expense, amounted to $186,000 for the year ended September 30, 1999.
GOODWILL. Goodwill is amortized using the straight-line method over three years.
The Company, as applicable, evaluates whether there has been a permanent
impairment in the value of goodwill. Any impairment would be recognized when the
sum of expected undiscounted cash flows derived from the acquired business is
less than its carrying value.
INCOME TAXES. The Company recognizes deferred taxes by the asset and liability
method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method,
deferred income taxes are recognized for differences between the financial
statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities at enacted statutory tax rates
in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The
effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the
period that includes the enactment date. In addition, valuation allowances are
established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected
to be realized. The primary sources of temporary differences are depreciation
and amortization of intangible assets.
REVENUE AND COST RECOGNITION - SYSTEMS- AND MATERIALS-RELATED REVENUES. Revenue
from systems sales is recognized upon shipment, when title passes to the
customer. Subsequent to product shipment, the Company incurs certain
installation costs at the customer's facility and warranty costs that are
estimated and accrued at the time the sale is recognized. Materials and service
revenues are recognized when goods are shipped or services are rendered to the
customer. Service revenue under contracts with specified service terms is
recognized as earned over the service period in accordance with the terms of the
applicable contract. Costs in connection with the procurement of the contracts
are charged to expense as incurred.
REVENUE AND COST RECOGNITION - CONTRACT REVENUE. The Company's research
contracts require the development or evaluation of new materials applications
and have a duration of six to thirty-six months. For research contracts with the
U.S. Government and commercial enterprises with a duration greater than six
months, the Company recognizes revenue to the extent of costs incurred plus the
estimated gross profit as stipulated in such contracts, based upon contract
performance. Contracts with a duration of six months or less are accounted for
on the completed contract method. A contract is considered complete when all
costs, except insignificant items, have been incurred, and the research
reporting requirements to the customer have been met. Contract costs include all
direct material and labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract
performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs and depreciation
costs, as well as coverage of certain general and administrative costs.
Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period
in which such losses are determined. Revenues from contracts amounted to
approximately $614,000, $438,000 and $1.4 million for the years ended September
30, 1997, 1998 and 1999, respectively.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and development costs related to the
development of both present and future products and Company-sponsored materials
application research are charged to expense as incurred. In connection with the
acquisition of MicroOptical Devices, Inc. ("MODE"), the Company recorded a
charge of $19,516,000 for acquired in-process research and development.
-37-
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS. The Company estimates the fair value of its
financial instruments based upon discounted cash flow analyses using the
Company's incremental borrowing rate on similar instruments as the discount
rate. As of September 30, 1999, the carrying values of the Company's cash and
cash equivalents, accounts receivables and accounts payable as reflected on the
Company's accompanying balance sheet approximates fair value.
USE OF ESTIMATES. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates. The
Company's most significant estimates relate to acquired in-process research and
development, accounts receivable and inventory valuation reserves, warranty and
installation accruals, estimates of cost and related gross profits on certain
research contracts and the valuation of long-lived assets.
NET LOSS PER SHARE. The Company accounts for earnings per share under the
provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 "Earnings per
Share". Basic earnings per common share was calculated by dividing net loss by
the weighted average number of common stock shares outstanding during the
period. The effect of outstanding common stock purchase options and warrants,
the number of shares available to be issued upon the conversion of the Company's
Series I Preferred Stock and the number of shares to be issued upon conversion
of the convertible subordinated debenture have been excluded from the earnings
per share calculation since the effect of such securities is anti-dilutive. The
following table reconciles the number of shares utilized in the earnings per
share calculations.
-38-
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK. The Company performs material application research
under contract with the U.S. Government or as a subcontractor of U.S. Government
funded projects. The demand for services and products is directly related to the
level of funding of government programs. There can be no assurance that Federal
programs will continue to be funded even if government agencies have available
financial resources or that the Company will continue to be awarded contracts
under such programs.
The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers'
financial condition and generally requires no collateral from its customers. The
Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses based upon the credit
risk of specified customers, historical trends and other information. To reduce
credit risk and to fund manufacturing costs, the Company requires periodic
prepayments or irrevocable letters of credit on most production system orders.
During fiscal year 1998, the Company wrote off outstanding receivables of
approximately $1.0 million that was due from an Asian customer. Prior to this
event, the Company's credit losses generally had not exceeded its expectations.
Although such loses have been within management's expectations to date, there
can be no assurance that such reserves will continue to be adequate.
The Company has maintained cash balances with certain financial
institutions in excess of the $100,000 insured limit of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation.
SEGMENTS DATA. Effective October 1, 1998, the Company adopted the Financial
Accounting Standards Board's Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information"
("SFAS No. 131"). SFAS No. 131 establishes standards for reporting information
about operating segments in annual financial statements and selected information
about operating segments in interim financial reports. It also establishes
standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas
and major customers. The adoption of SFAS No. 131 did not affect results of
operations or financial position, but did affect the disclosure of segment
information (See Note 14).
RECENT FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In March 1998, the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants ("AICPA") issued Statement of Position ("SOP")
98-1, "Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for
Internal Use" ("SOP 98-1"). SOP 98-1 provides guidance over accounting for
computer software developed or obtained for internal use, including the
requirement to capitalize specified costs and amortization of such costs. The
Company is required to adopt this standard in its fiscal year ended September
30, 2000. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a
material effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In April 1998, AICPA issued SOP 98-5, "Reporting on the Costs of
Start-Up Activities". SOP 98-5 provides guidance on the financial reporting of
start-up costs and organization costs. It requires costs of start up activities
and organization costs to be expensed as incurred. The Company is required to
adopt this standard in its fiscal year ended September 30, 2000. The adoption of
this standard is not expected to have a material impact on its results of
operations, financial position or cash flows.
In June of 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This statement establishes
accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and requires
recognition of all derivatives as assets or liabilities in the statement of
financial position and measurement of these instruments at fair value. The
statement, as amended, is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2000. The Company is required to adopt this standard, as amended, in its fiscal
year ended September 30, 2001. Management believes that adopting this statement
will not have a material impact on the financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows of the Company.
-39-
NOTE 3. ACQUISITION
On December 5, 1997, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock
of MicroOptical Devices, Inc. ("MODE") in exchange for 1,461,866 shares of
EMCORE common stock, 200,966 common stock purchase options (exercise prices
ranging from $0.43 to $0.59), and 47,118 common stock purchase warrants
(exercise prices ranging from $4.32 to $5.92). The purchase price was
approximately $32,829,000 including direct acquisition costs of approximately
$500,000. The acquisition of MODE was recorded using the purchase method of
accounting. Accordingly, the results of operations of the acquired business and
the fair values of the acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed
liabilities have been included in the Company's financial statements as of
December 5, 1997. The allocation of the fair value of the net assets acquired is
as follows:
(in thousands)
--------------
Net tangible assets $ 156
Goodwill 13,157
Acquired in process research and development 19,516
-------
Total purchase price $32,829
=======
The common stock issued in connection with the MODE acquisition was valued based
upon the average closing price of the Company's common stock for the five days
before and after the announcement date of the acquisition. The assumed MODE
options and warrants were valued using Black-Scholes and such values amounted to
approximately $3,761,000 and $793,000, respectively.
The MODE options have a term of 10 years from the date of grant, with such
options expiring at various dates through July 2007. The options vest, with
continued service, over a four-year period; 25% in year one and 75% equally over
the remaining 36 months. The warrants have a term of 10 years from the date of
grant, were exercisable upon grant, and expire at various dates through May
2007.
MODE was a development stage company (incorporated in August 1995) and had 18
employees at the date of acquisition. MODE's activities were substantially
dedicated towards the research and development of optical laser devices at the
date of acquisition.
Management is responsible for estimating the fair value of the acquired
in-process research and development. As of the date of acquisition, MODE had six
primary micro-optical laser research and development projects in-process, which
had not reached technological feasibility. MODE's in-process research and
development related to new technologies, the fair value assumptions relating to
pricing, product margins and expense levels were based upon management's
experience with its own operations and the compound semiconductor industry as a
whole.
The Company allocated $475,000 of the purchase price to the acquired workforce
of MODE which is included in the approximately $13.2 million of goodwill
discussed above. The amount allocated to goodwill is being amortized over a
period of three years.
-40-
NOTE 4. JOINT VENTURES
In May 1999, EMCORE and General Electric Lighting formed GELcore, a joint
venture to develop and market HB LED lighting products. General Electric
Lighting and EMCORE have agreed that this joint venture will be the exclusive
vehicle for each party's participation in solid state lighting. GELcore seeks to
combine EMCORE's materials science expertise, process technology and compound
semiconductor production systems with General Electric Lighting's brand name
recognition and extensive marketing and distribution capabilities. GELcore's
long-term goal is to develop products to replace traditional lighting. Under
terms of the joint venture agreement, EMCORE has a 49% non-controlling interest
in the GELcore venture and accounts for its investment under the equity method
of accounting. EMCORE has seconded various employees to the joint venture to
assist in the development of products.
In May, 1999, in connection with the GELcore venture, General Electric funded
the Company's initial capital contribution of $7.8 million into GELcore. The
funding was in the form of a subordinated debenture (the "Debenture") with an
interest rate of 4.75%. The Debenture will mature in 2006 and is convertible
into common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $22.875 or 340,984
shares. The Debenture is convertible at any time at the option of General
Electric and may be called by the Company after three years, if the price of the
Company's common stock has traded at or above $34 for at least thirty days. In
addition, General Electric also received 282,010 warrants to purchase common
stock at $22.875 per share. These warrants are exercisable at any time and will
expire in 2006. These warrants were valued using the Black Scholes model,
resulting in a valuation of $2.6 million, which has been included in other
assets. Such asset is being amortized over seven years. On a fully diluted
basis, General Electric would own approximately 4.5% of the common stock of the
Company.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999, the Company recognized a loss of
$2.5 million related to this venture which has been recorded as a component of
other income and expense. As of September 30, 1999, the Company's net investment
in this venture amounted to $5.3 million. The Company is obligated to fund the
joint venture with an additional $7.8 million in fiscal year 2000.
In November 1998, EMCORE formed UMCore, a joint venture with Union Miniere Inc.,
a mining and materials company, to explore and develop alternate uses for
germanium using EMCORE's materials science and production platform expertise and
Union Miniere's access to and experience with germanium. EMCORE has a 50%
non-controlling interest in the venture and accounts for its interest in the
venture under the equity method of accounting. In fiscal year 1999, the Company
invested $896,000 in the venture. The Company is obligated to fund the venture's
capital requirements in proportion to its equity interest. EMCORE has seconded
various personnel to the joint venture to assist in the development of products.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999, the EMCORE recognized a loss of
$297,000 related to this venture which has been recorded as a component of other
income and expense. As of September 30, 1999, the Company's net investment in
this venture amounted to $599,000.
In October 1998, EMCORE formed Emtech, a joint venture with Optek Technology,
Inc., a packager and distributor of optoelectronic devices, to market an
expanded line of magneto resistive sensors to the automotive and related
industries. This joint venture combines EMCORE's expertise in the manufacture of
magneto resistive die and Optek's expertise in packaging these die. This
combination will provide customers with off-the-shelf products. No additional
personnel are anticipated to meet the obligations to the joint venture. EMCORE
has a 50% non-controlling interest in the venture and accounts for its interest
in the venture under the equity method of accounting. EMCORE is obligated to
fund the venture's capital requirements in proportion to its equity interest. As
of September 30, 1999, EMCORE has not funded the joint venture nor has the joint
venture commenced operations.
In December 1997, the Company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Uniroyal
Technology Corporation formed Uniroyal Optoelectronics LLC ("UOE"), a joint
venture, to manufacture, sell and distribute High Brightness (HB) LED wafers and
package-ready devices. EMCORE has a 49% non-controlling interest in the joint
venture and accounts for its investment under the equity method of accounting.
In fiscal years 1998 and 1999, the Company invested $490,000 and $5.5 million,
respectively, in the venture that is classified as a component of other
long-term assets. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999, EMCORE sold
three compound semiconductor production systems to the venture totaling $5.3
million in revenues. EMCORE deferred gross profit of approximately $1.3 million
on such sales to the extent of its minority interest. Such deferred gross profit
will be recognized ratably over the assigned life of the production systems
purchased by the joint venture. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 1998
and 1999, the Company recognized a loss of $198,000 and 2.2 million,
-41-
respectively related to this venture which has been recorded as a component of
other income and expense. As of September 30, 1999, the Company's net investment
in this venture amounted to $3.6 million. The following summarized financial
information of EMCORE's joint ventures, (GELcore, UMCore and UOE), in aggregate,
is provided as of and for the year ended September 30, 1999.
(in thousands) UNAUDITED
-------------- ---------
Net sales $490
Gross loss (600)
Net loss (10,218)
Current assets 16,480
Non-current assets 21,567
Current liabilities 8,136
Non-current liabilities 17,790
NOTE 5. INVENTORIES
The components of inventories consisted of the following:
(in thousands) As of September 30,
-----------------------
1998 1999
------- -------
Raw materials $11,346 $ 9,146
Work-in-process 1,092 3,620
Finished goods 7 1,224
------- -------
Total $12,445 $13,990
======= =======
NOTE 6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Major classes of property and equipment are summarized below:
(in thousands) As of September 30,
-----------------------
1998 1999
-------- --------
Land $ 1,029 $ 1,029
Building 7,493 9,179
Equipment 28,367 41,225
Furniture and fixtures 3,256 4,880
Leasehold improvements 9,948 10,764
Equipment, furniture and fixtures and
leasehold improvement under capital
lease 2,043 2,164
-------- --------
52,136 69,241
Less: accumulated depreciation and
amortization (15,926) (22,959)
-------- --------
Total $ 36,210 $ 46,282
======== ========
-42-
At September 30, 1999, minimum future lease payments due under the
capital leases are as follows:
(IN THOUSANDS)
Period ending:
September 30, 2000 $776
September 30, 2001 82
September 30, 2002 41
September 30, 2003 15
September 30, 2004 5
---------
Total minimum lease payments 919
Less: amount representing interest
(imputed interest rate of 14.4%) (65)
---------
Net minimum lease payments 854
Less: current portion 713
---------
Long-term portion $141
=========
The provisions for depreciation and amortization expense on owned property and
equipment amounted to approximately $3.1 million, $4.7 million and $6.6 million
for the years ended September 30, 1997, 1998 and 1999, respectively. Accumulated
amortization on assets accounted for as capital lease amounted to approximately
$366,000 and $834,000 as of September 30, 1998 and 1999, respectively.
Included in equipment above are twenty systems and twenty-one systems with a
combined net book value of approximately $9.8 million and $13.7 million at
September 30, 1998 and 1999, respectively. Such systems are utilized for the
production of compound semiconductor wafers and package-ready devices for sale
to third parties, systems demonstration purposes, system sales support, in-house
materials applications, internal research and contract research funded by third
parties.
NOTE 7. ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses consisted of the following:
(in thousands) As of September 30,
----------------------------
1998 1999
----------------------------
Accrued payroll, vacation and
other employee expenses $2,114 $1,631
Installation and warranty costs 704 929
Interest 346 129
Other 1,033 1,484
------ ------
Total $4,197 $4,173
====== ======
-43-
NOTE 8. DEBT FACILITIES
CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED DEBENTURE
In May 1999, in connection with the GELcore venture, General Electric funded the
Company's initial capital contribution of $7.8 million into GELcore. The funding
was in the form of a subordinated debenture (the "Debenture") with an interest
rate of 4.75%. The Debenture will mature in 2006 and is convertible into common
stock of the Company at a conversion price of $22.875 or 340,984 shares. The
Debenture is convertible at any time at the option of General Electric and may
be called by the Company after three years, if the price of the Company's common
stock has traded at or above $34 for at least thirty days. In addition, General
Electric also received 282,010 warrants to purchase common stock at $22.875 per
share. These warrants are exercisable at any time and will expire in 2006. These
warrants were valued using the Black Scholes model, resulting in a valuation of
$2.6 million, which has been included in other assets. Such asset is being
amortized over seven years and is charged to "Imputed warrant interest,
non-cash". On a fully diluted basis, General Electric would own approximately
4.5% of the common stock of the Company.
BANK LOANS
LOAN AGREEMENT:
In March 1997, the Company entered into a $10.0 million loan agreement with
First Union National Bank (the "Loan Agreement") that had an interest rate of
Prime plus 50 basis points (8.75% at September 30, 1998). As of September 30,
1998 the Company had $9,950,000 outstanding under this facility. As of September
30, 1999, there were no amounts outstanding under this facility (see below). The
Loan Agreement contains financial covenants which, among other things, require
maintenance of certain financial ratios, liquidity and net worth. As a result of
the net loss for certain quarters in the years ended September 30, 1998 and
1999, the Company was not in compliance with the Loan Agreement's debt
covenants. The Company received a waiver from the bank regarding this
non-compliance. Subsequent to year-end 1999, the Company's Loan Agreement was
extended through January 31, 2001. The Loan Agreement's financial covenants were
modified under the third amendment, and management believes that the Company
will be able to comply with such requirements throughout fiscal year 2000.
1998 AGREEMENT:
In June 1998, the Company entered into an $8.0 million loan agreement with First
Union National Bank (the "1998 Agreement") that had an interest rate equal to
one-month LIBOR plus three-quarters of one percent per annum (6.4% at September
30, 1998). As of September 30, 1998, $8.0 million was outstanding under the 1998
Agreement. As of September 30, 1999, there were no amounts outstanding under
this facility (see below). The 1998 Agreement expired upon completion of the
public offering (see Note 11). The 1998 Agreement was guaranteed by both the
Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In exchange for guaranteeing the
facility, both the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer were granted an
aggregate of 284,684 common stock purchase warrants exercisable at $11.375 per
share until May 1, 2001. These warrants are callable at the Company's option at
$0.85 per warrant at such time as the Company's Common Stock has traded at or
above 150% of the exercise price for a period of thirty days. The Company
assigned a value of $1,310,000 to the warrants issued to the guarantors. This
valuation was based upon the Company's application of Black-Scholes. This value
was accounted for as debt issuance cost and was completely amortized by
September 30, 1999. See extraordinary item described below.
In June 1999, the Company completed the issuance of an additional 3.0 million
common stock shares through a public offering, which resulted in proceeds of
$52.0 million, net of issuance costs. A portion of the proceeds was used to
repay all outstanding bank loans.
-44-
SUBORDINATED NOTES:
In May 1996, the Company issued subordinated notes (the "Subordinated Notes") in
the amount of $9,500,000 to its existing shareholders, $1,000,000 of which were
exchanged for notes receivable from officers and certain employees with
identical payment and interest provisions. The Subordinated Notes are scheduled
to mature on May 1, 2001, and have a stated interest rate of 6.0% which is
payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1. In addition, the noteholders were
issued 2,328,432 common stock purchase warrants with an exercise price of $4.08
per share which expire on May 1, 2001. The warrants are exercisable after
November 1, 1996, and are callable at the Company's option, after May 1, 1997,
at $0.85 per warrant. The Company has the legal right of offset with respect to
the notes receivable from officers and certain key employees, and it is their
full intention to offset the corresponding notes receivable and payable upon
maturity. As such, the Company reflected $848,000 of the officers' and
employees' notes receivable as a contra liability, reducing the Company's
Subordinated Notes balance. The remaining $152,000 note receivable has been
reflected as a contra equity note receivable balance, representing the portion
of the employee note receivable associated with common stock purchase warrants
issued to such employees. The Company received cash proceeds of $8,500,000 in
connection with this Subordinated Notes issuance.
In September 1996, the Company issued a subordinated note in the amount of
$2,500,000 to the Company's then majority shareholder with terms identical to
the Subordinated Notes issued on May 1, 1996. In addition, under the terms of
this issuance, 245,098 common stock purchase warrants were issued to purchase
common stock at $10.20 per share and which expire September 1, 2001. These
warrants are exercisable after March 1, 1997, and are callable at the Company's
option after September 1, 1997, at $0.85 per warrant. The Company assigned a
value of $1,440,000 to the May 1, 1996 detachable warrants and $900,000 to the
September 1, 1996 detachable warrants. These valuations were based upon the
Company's application of Black-Scholes and the Company's assessment of the
underlying valuation factors, as well as an assessment of the terms of the
Subordinated Notes. The carrying value of the Subordinated Notes will be subject
to periodic accretions, using the interest method, in order for the carrying
amount to equal the Company's obligation upon maturity. As a result, the May 1,
1996 and September 1, 1996 Subordinated Notes have an effective interest rate of
approximately 9.3% and 15.0%, respectively. For the years ended September 30,
1997, 1998 and 1999, imputed warrant interest related to the Subordinated Notes
amounted to $388,000, $370,000 and $293,000, respectively.
In June 1999, a portion of the proceeds from the public offering was used to
repay all outstanding subordinated notes. The difference between the carrying
value of the subordinated notes and the face value was recorded as an
extraordinary loss, as noted below.
DEMAND NOTE FACILITIES:
On September 17, 1998, the Company borrowed $7.0 million from its Chairman at an
interest rate of Prime plus 200 basis points (10.25% as of September 30, 1998),
per annum. In addition, on October 23, 1998 the Company borrowed an additional
$1.5 million from its Chairman on identical terms. The entire sum of $8.5
million borrowed plus interest was repaid from the proceeds of the Private
Placement (see Note 11). The demand note facility expired upon completion of the
public offering (see Note 11)
EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS:
On June 15, 1999, the Company repaid its outstanding bank loans using a portion
of the proceeds from the public offering. The Company also used a portion of the
net proceeds to repurchase its outstanding 6.0% subordinated notes due 2001. The
early extinguishment of debt resulted in an extraordinary charge of $1.3 million
or $0.13 per share in fiscal year 1999 that consisted of the following:
(in thousands)
EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS:
--------------------
Discount on prepayment of 6% subordinated notes due 2001...... $ 867
Write-off of deferred financing costs......................... 467
------
Net extraordinary loss $1,334
======
-45-
On October 25, 1996, the Company entered into a $10.0 million demand note
facility (the "Facility"). The Facility bore interest at the rate of LIBOR plus
75 basis points, had a term of one year and was due and payable on demand. The
Facility was guaranteed by the Chairman of the Company's Board of Directors who
provided collateral for the Facility. In December 1996, in return for
guaranteeing the facility, the Company granted the Chairman 980,392 common stock
purchase warrants at $10.20 per share which expire September 1, 2001. These
warrants are exercisable after July 1, 1997, and are callable at the Company's
option after December 1, 1997 at $0.85 per warrant. The Facility was terminated
in conjunction with the Company's initial public offering.
The Company assigned a value of $3,600,000 to the warrants issued to the
guarantor. This valuation was based upon the Company's application of
Black-Scholes. This value was accounted for as debt issuance cost and was
amortized over the expected period that the facility was to be in place (four
months). The Company utilized a portion of the proceeds from its initial public
offering to pay down or discharge certain of its debts. The Company repaid the
entire $8.0 million outstanding under its October 1996 Facility and $2.0 million
was used to repay a portion of the Company's outstanding subordinated notes, due
May 1, 2001. In connection with the discharge of the Company's subordinated
notes, an extraordinary loss of $286,000 was recognized in fiscal year 1997.
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
On November 16, 1992, the Company entered into a three-year lease agreement with
a bank for 34,000 square feet of space in the building the Company presently
occupies. On March 31, 1995, the agreement was renewed for 5 years for 49,000
square feet. In November 1996, the Company signed an agreement to occupy the
remaining 26,000 square feet that it previously had not occupied. In May 1999,
the agreement was renewed for another 5 years.
The Company leases certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases.
Facility and equipment rent expense under such leases amounted to approximately
$548,000, $637,000 and $761,000 for the years ended September 30, 1997, 1998 and
1999, respectively.
Future minimum rental payments under the Company's non-cancelable operating
leases with an initial or remaining term of one year or more as of September 30,
1999 are as follows:
(in thousands)
PERIOD ENDING: Operating
-------------- ------------
September 30, 2000 $448
September 30, 2001 129
September 30, 2002 55
September 30, 2003 7
September 30, 2004 --
----
Total minimum lease payments $639
----
In January 1999, Rockwell settled litigation that challenged the validity of
certain patents which EMCORE licensed from Rockwell prior to the commencement of
the litigation. As a result of this settlement, EMCORE will be required to pay
Rockwell a royalty including interest under our license agreement relating to
TurboDisc(TM) tools. EMCORE believes it has adequately accrued for these
royalties. In addition, prior to the commencement of the litigation, EMCORE had
initiated discussions with Rockwell to receive additional licenses to permit
EMCORE to use the technology to manufacture and sell wafers and devices. EMCORE
may be required to pay royalties to Rockwell for certain past sales of wafers
and devices to customers who do not hold licenses directly from Rockwell.
Management has reviewed and reassessed the royalty agreements and concluded that
it has the appropriate amounts reserved for at both September 30, 1998 and 1999.
We are currently negotiating with Rockwell to obtain the necessary licenses to
continue to manufacture and sell wafers and devices. The Rockwell patent expires
in January 2000. The failure to obtain licenses to manufacture these wafers and
devices on commercially reasonable terms may materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations through January 2000.
The Company is from time to time involved in litigation incidental to the
conduct of its business. Management and its counsel believe that such pending
litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations, cash flows or financial condition.
-46-
NOTE 10. INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense consists of the following:
(IN THOUSANDS) For the years ended September 30,
--------------------------------------------
1997 1998 1999
------------- ------------- -------------
Current:
Federal $ 113 $ -- $ --
State 24 -- --
----- ---- ----
137 -- --
Deferred:
Federal -- -- --
State -- -- --
----- ---- ----
Total $ 137 $ -- $ --
----- ---- ----
The principal differences between the U.S. statutory and effective income tax
rates were as follows:
The components of the Company's net deferred taxes were as follows:
The Company has established a valuation reserve as it has not determined that it
is more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset is realizable, based
upon the Company's past earnings history.
-47-
As of September 30, 1999, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards for
tax purposes of approximately $24.0 million that expire in the years 2003
through 2019. The Company believes that the consummation of certain equity
transactions and a significant change in the ownership during fiscal years 1995,
1998 and 1999 have constituted a change in control under Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code ("IRC"). Due to the change in control, the Company's
ability to use its federal net operating loss carryovers and federal research
credit carryovers to offset future income and income taxes, respectively, are
subject to annual limitations under IRC Sections 382 and 383.
The Company believes that the acquisition of MODE and the consummation of
certain other equity transactions has constituted a change in control in fiscal
1998 under Section 382 of the IRC. As such, Federal net operating loss
carryovers and research credit carryovers incurred subsequent to the Company's
fiscal 1995 change in control (as described above) will also be subject to
annual limitations under IRC Sections 382 and 383.
NOTE 11. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
REVERSE STOCK SPLIT. On February 3, 1997, the Board of Directors approved a
3.4:1 reverse stock split of its common stock and approved a decrease in the
number of shares of common stock authorized. All references in the accompanying
financial statements to the number of common stock and per-share amounts have
been restated to reflect the reverse split.
COMMON STOCK OFFERING. On March 6, 1997, the Company completed an initial public
offering of 2,500,000 shares of common stock at a price of $9.00 per share (the
"Offering"), and upon the exercise of the Underwriter's overallotment option,
375,000 additional shares of common stock were also sold at $9.00 per share. The
proceeds, net of commissions and certain expenses, to the Company from the
offering were approximately $22.8 million. Prior to the Offering, there was no
public market for the Company's common stock.
PUBLIC OFFERING. On June 15, 1999, the Company completed the issuance of an
additional 3.0 million common stock shares through a public offering, which
resulted in proceeds of $52.0 million, net of issuance costs of $5.0 million. A
portion of the proceeds was used to repay all outstanding bank indebtedness and
subordinated notes.
PREFERRED STOCK. The Company's certificate of incorporation authorizes the Board
of Directors to issue up to 5,882,353 shares of preferred stock of the Company
upon such terms and conditions having such rights, privileges and preferences as
the Board of Directors may determine.
PRIVATE PLACEMENT OFFERING. On November 30, 1998, the Company sold an aggregate
of 1,550,000 shares of Series I Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ("the
Series I Preferred Stock") for aggregate consideration of $21.7 million before
deducting costs and expenses, which amounted to approximately $500,000. The
Series I Preferred Stock was recorded net of issuance costs. The excess of the
preference amount over the carrying value is being accreted by periodic charges
to accumulated deficit. The shares of Series I Preferred Stock are convertible,
at any time, at the option of the holders thereof, unless previously redeemed,
into shares of common stock at an initial conversion price of $14.00 per share
of common stock, subject to adjustment in certain cases. The market price of the
Company's common stock was $12.875 on the date the Series I Preferred Stock was
issued. The Series I Preferred Stock is redeemable, in whole or in part, at the
option of the Company at any time the Company's stock has traded at or above
$28.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days, at a price of $14.00 per
share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, to the redemption date. The
Series I Preferred Stock carries a dividend of 2% per annum. Dividends are being
charged to accumulated deficit. In addition, the Series I Preferred Stock is
subject to mandatory redemption by the Company at $14.00 per share plus
accumulated and unpaid dividends, if any, on November 17, 2003. On June 15,
1999, 520,000 shares of Series I Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock were
converted to common stock.
-48-
NOTE 12. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
STOCK OPTION PLAN. In November 1994, the Company's Incentive Stock Option Plan,
initiated in 1987, was eliminated. On June 5, 1995, the Company adopted the 1995
Incentive and Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan (the "Option Plan"). Under the
terms of the Option Plan, options to acquire 323,529 shares of common stock may
be granted to eligible employees, as defined, at no less than 100 percent of the
fair market value on the date of grant. In March 1996, the ability to grant
options to acquire an additional 323,530 shares of common stock was approved. In
February 1997, the ability to grant options to acquire an additional 725,000
shares of common stock was approved. As of September 30, 1999, 82,578 stock
options were available for issuance under the Company's Option Plan.
Certain options under the Option Plan are intended to qualify as incentive stock
options pursuant to Section 422A of the Internal Revenue Code.
During fiscal 1999, options with respect to 330,795 shares were granted pursuant
to the Company's option plan at exercise prices ranging from $8.00 to $26.50 per
share.
Stock options granted generally vest over three to five years and are
exercisable over a ten-year period. As of September 30, 1997, 1998 and 1999,
options with respect to 199,368, 481,863 and 554,439 shares were exercisable,
respectively.
The following table summarized the activity under the plan:
At September 30, 1999, stock options outstanding were as follows:
In connection with the Company's acquisition of MODE, it assumed 200,978 common
stock purchase options with exercise prices ranging from $0.43 to $0.60. The
MODE options have a term of 10 years from the date of grant, with such options
expiring at various dates through July 31, 2007. The options vest, with
continued service, over a four-year period; 25% in year one and 75% equally over
the remaining 36 months.
-49-
The following table summarizes the activity of options assumed in the MODE
acquisition:
In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123,
"ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK BASED COMPENSATION" ("SFAS 123"). SFAS 123 establishes
financial and reporting standards for stock based compensation plans. The
Company has adopted the disclosure only provisions of this standard and has
elected to continue to apply the provision of Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees". Had the Company
elected to recognize compensation expense for stock options based on the fair
value at the grant dates of awards, net loss and net loss per share would have
been as follows:
The weighted average fair value of the Company's stock options was calculated
using Black-Scholes with the following weighted-average assumptions used for
grants: no dividend yield; expected volatility of 0% prior to the Company's
initial public offering, 60% for fiscal years 1997 and 1998 and 76% for fiscal
year 1999; a risk-free interest rate of 6.0%, 5.6% and 5.8% for fiscal years
1997, 1998 and 1999, respectively; and expected lives of 5 years. The weighted
average fair value of options granted during the years ended September 30, 1997,
1998 and 1999 was $3.82, $7.50 and $9.05 per share, respectively. Stock options
granted by the Company prior to its initial public offering were valued using
the minimum value method under FASB No. 123.
WARRANTS.
WARRANT EXERCISE. On December 3, 1997, the holders of 1.8 million common stock
purchase warrants (with an exercise price of $4.08) exercised such warrants with
the Company taking full recourse notes amounting to approximately $7.5 million
in exchange for the issued common stock. The notes receivable mature and are
payable in full on May 1, 2001 and have an interest rate of 6%, compounding
semi-annually. In addition, the holders are required to provide collateral at a
2:1 coverage ratio. The Company presently holds this collateral.
-50-
Set forth below is a summary of the Company's outstanding warrants at September
30, 1999:
(1) issued in connection with EMCORE's May 1996 subordinated note
issuance.
(2) issued in connection with EMCORE's December 1997 acquisition of
MicroOptical Devices, Inc.
(3) issued in connection with EMCORE's September 1996 subordinated
debt issuance and October 1996 debt guarantee.
(4) issued in connection with EMCORE's June 1998 bank loan agreement.
(5) issued in connection with EMCORE's May 1999 formation of the joint
venture with GEL.
NOTE 13. RELATED PARTIES
In fiscal year 1997, the Company entered into a $5.0 million non-exclusive and
non-refundable technology licensing and royalty agreement with Uniroyal
Technology Corporation ("UTC") for the process technology to develop and
manufacture high brightness light emitting diodes ("HB LEDs"). During fiscal
years 1997 and 1998, revenue associated with the UTC licensing agreement
amounted to $2.5 million annually. At the time the transaction was originally
entered into, UTC's Chairman and CEO was a member of EMCORE's Board of Directors
and EMCORE's Chairman was on the Board of Directors of UTC.
In December 1997, the Company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Uniroyal
Technology Corporation formed Uniroyal Optoelectronics LLC, a joint venture, to
manufacture, sell and distribute High Brightness (HB) LED wafers and
package-ready devices (see Note 4). During the fiscal year ended September 30,
1999, EMCORE sold three compound semiconductor production systems to the venture
totaling $5.3 million in revenues. EMCORE deferred gross profit of approximately
$1.3 million on such sales to the extent of its minority interest. Such deferred
gross profit will be recognized ratably over the assigned life of the production
systems purchased by the joint venture. As of September 30, 1999, the Company
had an outstanding related party receivable of $1.8 million.
In May 1999, EMCORE and General Electric Lighting formed GELcore, a joint
venture to develop and market HB LED lighting products. As of September 30,
1999, the Company had an outstanding related party receivable of $673,000.
The President of Hakuto Co. Ltd. ("Hakuto"), the Company's Asian distributor, is
a member of the Company's Board of Directors and Hakuto is a minority
shareholder of the Company. During the years ended September 30, 1998 and 1999,
sales made through Hakuto approximated $9.2 million and $10.2 million
respectively.
On June 22, 1998, the Company entered into a bank loan agreement, which was
guaranteed by the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (see
Note 8).
On September 17, 1998, the Company borrowed $7.0 million from its Chairman,
Thomas J. Russell at an interest rate of 9.75% per annum. In addition, on
October 23, 1998 the Company borrowed an additional $1.5 million from its
Chairman on identical terms. The entire $8.5 million, borrowed from Mr. Russell
was repaid from the proceeds of a private placement (See Note 8).
-51-
NOTE 14. SEGMENT DATA AND RELATED INFORMATION
EMCORE has two reportable operating segments: the systems-related business unit
and the materials-related business unit. The systems-related business unit
designs, develops and manufactures tools and manufacturing processes used to
fabricate compound semiconductor wafer and devices. Revenues for the
systems-related business unit consists of sales of EMCORE's Turbodisc(TM)
production systems as well as spare parts and services. Our systems-related
business unit assists our customers with device design, process development and
optimal configuration of TurboDisc(TM) production systems. The materials-related
business unit designs, develops and manufactures compound semiconductor
materials. Revenues for the materials-related business unit include sales of
semiconductor wafers, devices and process development technology. EMCORE's
vertically-integrated product offering allows it to provide a complete compound
semiconductor solution to its customers.
The segments reported below are the segments of the Company for which separate
financial information is available and for which gross profit amounts are
evaluated regularly by executive management in deciding how to allocate
resources and in assessing performance. The accounting policies of the operating
segments are the same as those described in the summary of accounting policies
(see Note 2). The Company does not allocate assets or operating expenses to the
individual operating segments. There are no intercompany sales transactions
between the two operating segments.
The Company's reportable operating segments are business units that offer
different products. The reportable segments are each managed separately because
they manufacture and distribute distinct products and services.
Information about reported segment gross profit is as follows:
-52-
The Company sells its compound semiconductor products domestically and
internationally. The Company's international sales are generally made under
letter of credit arrangements. The following chart contains a breakdown of
EMCORE's worldwide sales to customers and percentages by geographic region.
Historically, EMCORE has received all payments for products and services in U.S.
dollars.
All long-lived assets are located in the North America region. Significant sales
in the Asia region are predominately made in Japan and Taiwan. Sales to
customers that accounted for at least 10% of total EMCORE revenues are outlined
below. In fiscal year 1999, no individual customer had sales equal to or in
excess of 10% of total fiscal year 1999 revenues.
(in thousands) For the fiscal years ended September 30,
----------------------------------------
1997 1998
------- -------
Customer A $ 4,873 $ 7,583
Customer B 7,159 5,602
------- -------
Total $12,032 $13,185
======= =======
NOTE 15. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
* includes $19.5 million one-time acquired in-process, non-cash research and
development.
-53-
NOTE 16. EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN
The Company has a savings plan (the "Savings Plan") that qualifies as a deferred
salary arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the
Savings Plan, participating employees may defer a portion of their pretax
earnings, up to the Internal Revenue Service annual contribution limit.
Effective August 1, 1997, the Company began contributing to the Savings Plan.
All employer contributions are made in the Company's common stock. For the years
ended September 30, 1998 and 1999, the Company contributed approximately
$252,000 and $376,000, respectively to the Savings Plan.
-54-
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of EMCORE Corporation
Somerset, New Jersey
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of EMCORE
Corporation (the "Company") as of September 30, 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 1999. Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 14(a)(2).
These financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of EMCORE Corporation as of
September 30, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 1999 in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion,
such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
January 10, 2000
-55-
STATEMENT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
To the Shareholders of
EMCORE Corporation:
Management has prepared and is responsible for the consolidated
financial statements and related information in the Annual Report. The financial
statements, which include amounts based on judgment, have been prepared in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied.
Management has developed, and continues to strengthen, a system of
internal accounting and other controls for the Company. Management believes
these controls provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded from
loss or unauthorized use and that the Company's financial records are a reliable
basis for preparing the financial statements. Underlying the concept of
reasonable assurance is the premise that the cost of control should not exceed
the benefit derived.
The Board of Directors, through its audit committee, is responsible for
reviewing and monitoring the Company's financial reporting and accounting
practices. The audit committee meets regularly with management and independent
accountants - both separately and together. The independent accountants have
free access to the audit committee to review the results of their audits, the
adequacy of internal accounting controls and the quality of financial reporting.
-56-
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC") and one of its predecessors, Coopers &
Lybrand L.L.P., have served as the Company's independent public accountants
since 1986. On May 13, 1999 the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "SEC") advised EMCORE that, in its view, because several current and former
Price Waterhouse LLP partners owned shares of EMCORE's common stock, PwC had
violated the independence standards promulgated by the SEC. The SEC staff
required that EMCORE change auditors and have a new accounting firm reaudit its
fiscal 1998 financial statements as a result of such violations by PwC.
In connection with the foregoing, on May 13, 1999, EMCORE engaged Deloitte
& Touche LLP as its independent public accountants to reaudit EMCORE's financial
statements for fiscal year 1998 and dismissed PwC as EMCORE's independent public
accountant for fiscal year 1998. Both of these decisions were approved by the
audit committee of our Board of Directors.
PwC's report on EMCORE's financial statements for the fiscal years 1997 and
1998 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not
qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.
In addition, through May 13, 1998, there were no disagreements with PwC on any
matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or
auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the
satisfaction of PwC, would have caused PwC to make reference to the subject
matter of the disagreement in connection with its report.
During the Company's two most recent fiscal years and through May 13, 1999,
there have been no reportable events, as defined in Regulation S-K Item
304(a)(1)(v).
Prior to formally being appointed as auditors on May 13, 1999, Deloitte &
Touche LLP performed certain audit-related work at the request of the Company as
a precaution in the event the SEC staff required the Company to change
accountants.
Despite providing its consent to the inclusion of its auditor's report for
the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997
on ten separate occasions in the past, following several requests by the
Company, PwC refused to provide its consent to the inclusion of its auditor's
report for the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1997 in the Company's Form 10-K filing. As a result of PwC's
refusal, the auditor's report for the Company's financial statements for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 was not included therein. PwC's auditor's
report for the financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997
was most recently included in the Company's 1998 Form 10-K/A filed on May 17,
1999 and the Company's Form S-3/A filed on October 6, 1999.
The Company believes that PwC has refused to provide its report and written
consent solely in retaliation for a lawsuit that the Company recently filed
against PwC in connection with PwC's violation of the independence standards
promulgated by the SEC discussed above.
PwC's report on the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1997 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of
opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or
accounting principles. There is no assurance that PwC would reissue its
auditor's report for the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1997 in its original form and without qualification. The
Company is not aware of any subsequent events, transactions or other matters
that may have affected the previous report. As a result of PwC's refusal, the
Company engaged Deloitte & Touche LLP to reaudit the Company's financial
statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997. A copy of Deloitte &
Touche LLP's auditor's report for the Company's financial statements for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 appears in this Form 10-K/A.
-57-
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to EMCORE's 1999 Proxy Statement, which will be filed on or before
January 28, 2000.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to EMCORE's 1999 Proxy Statement, which will be filed on or before
January 28, 2000.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to EMCORE's 1999 Proxy Statement, which will be filed on or before
January 28, 2000.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this term is incorporated herein by
reference to EMCORE's 1999 Proxy Statement, which will be filed on or before
January 28, 2000.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
Other schedules have been omitted since they are either not required or
not applicable.
-58-
14(A)(3) EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT INDEX - (CONTINUED)
21 Subsidiaries of the registrant.+
23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.*
27 Financial Data Schedule.+
- ----------
* Filed herewith
+ Filed previously
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the Registrant has
duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the Township of Somerset, State of
New Jersey, on January 12, 2000.
EMCORE CORPORATION
By: /s/ REUBEN F. RICHARDS, JR.
--------------------------------------------
Name: Reuben F. Richards, Jr.
TITLE: PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of EMCORE Corporation in the capacities indicated, on January 12, 2000.
SIGNATURE TITLE
--------- -----
/s/ THOMAS J. RUSSELL Chairman of the Board and Director
- ------------------------------
Thomas J. Russell
/s/ REUBEN F. RICHARDS, JR. President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
- ------------------------------ (Principal Executive Officer)
Reuben F. Richards, Jr.
/s/ THOMAS G. WERTHAN Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
- ------------------------------ and Director (Principal Accounting and
Thomas G. Werthan Financial Officer)
/s/ HOWARD W. BRODIE Vice President and Secretary
- ------------------------------
Howard W. Brodie
/s/ RICHARD A. STALL Director
- ------------------------------
Richard A. Stall
/s/ ROBERT LOUIS-DREYFUS Director
- ------------------------------
Robert Louis-Dreyfus
/s/ HUGH H. FENWICK Director
- ------------------------------
Hugh H. Fenwick
/s/ SHIGEO TAKAYAMA Director
- ------------------------------
Shigeo Takayama
/s/ CHARLES T. SCOTT Director
- ------------------------------
Charles T. Scott
/s/ JOHN HOGAN Director
- -----------------------------
John Hogan
-61-
Schedule II
EMCORE CORPORATION
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, 1998 AND 1999
-62-